Charhapiti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Charhapiti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Yeshitela as far as we know isn't in any way comparable to opportunist Gazi (BH), Yeshitela is comparable to Nkrumah | * Yeshitela as far as we know isn't in any way comparable to opportunist Gazi (BH), Yeshitela is comparable to Nkrumah | ||
* Uhuru's ideological contradictions with pan-Africanist parties are minor | * Uhuru's ideological contradictions with pan-Africanist parties are minor | ||
* | * The correct line on New Afrika / Black Belt Thesis is neutrality and upholding self-determination and nationhood for both Indigenous and Black people of Turtle Island in whatever form it takes with the consent of the Indigenous and Black people in the affected region. | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 6 May 2024
- Fix Christianity page and pages like it.
- Fix Liberia page, problem with last leader
- Pan-African non-Marxist socialists
- Most of these orgs are not Marxists
- It would not be smart to push them out. They are the Black Left
- Tanzania page - somebody cited VJ Prashad who has inaccuracies e.g. "failed to combat patriarchy" because Tanzania is a matriarchy and Tanzania's ruling party champion women's organization in fact the party is majority women
- Garveyism is progressive and anti-imperialist, anti-colonial, be sure to distinguish from American Colonization Society and Liberia wasn't settler-colonial it was a neocolony of the white US bourgeosie.
- Yeshitela as far as we know isn't in any way comparable to opportunist Gazi (BH), Yeshitela is comparable to Nkrumah
- Uhuru's ideological contradictions with pan-Africanist parties are minor
- The correct line on New Afrika / Black Belt Thesis is neutrality and upholding self-determination and nationhood for both Indigenous and Black people of Turtle Island in whatever form it takes with the consent of the Indigenous and Black people in the affected region.