More actions
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Wisconcom in the topic "On account request questions" on ProleWiki:Hub.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
They forget the massive rule of the ultra-rich in Chinese politics (Xi Xinping has a net-worth in the hundreds of millions), how there are atleast 100 billionaires in the highest levels of the Chinese Communist Party, and how the Chinese government has very commonly acted ''in favour'' with the ultra-rich, such as degrading labour rights (in a way similar to that of Neoliberal governments), exploiting labour markets overseas, and overall permiting the expansion of the ultra-richs' power. | They forget the massive rule of the ultra-rich in Chinese politics (Xi Xinping has a net-worth in the hundreds of millions), how there are atleast 100 billionaires in the highest levels of the Chinese Communist Party, and how the Chinese government has very commonly acted ''in favour'' with the ultra-rich, such as degrading labour rights (in a way similar to that of Neoliberal governments), exploiting labour markets overseas, and overall permiting the expansion of the ultra-richs' power. | ||
At the end of it, it offers what amonts to capitalist and billionaire apologetic arguments, only it is exclusively being apologetic towards Chinese capitalism. It says things like "we need multi-billionaires because they build advance trains and improve the lives of the workers!". This is nothing more than a crude repeat of | At the end of it, it offers what amonts to capitalist and billionaire apologetic arguments, only it is exclusively being apologetic towards Chinese capitalism. It says things like "we need multi-billionaires because they build advance trains and improve the lives of the workers!". This is nothing more than a crude repeat of Reagan's "Trickle-down" economics, and a total justifcation for bourgeoisie. This just exposes the degree of logical fallacies and mental gymnastics Dengists must rely upon to claim that clearly Capitalist and social-imperialist states like China are "socialist", to the point where they emulate the same arguments of Far-righters. | ||
I still do not see how we should not accept | I still do not see how we should not accept other viewpoints on the economic system of the People's Republic of China. | ||