More actions
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Amicchan in the topic "Anti-Scientific Content" on Talk:Psychiatry.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<blockquote>"It does not matter if a person is trusted; everyone should be able to independently verify that Psychiatry is a science; but no. Apparently only Psychiatr[ist]s are registered to do that. This is actually *anti-science*, as science demands that everyone should be allowed to perform independent verification." | <blockquote>"It does not matter if a person is trusted; everyone should be able to independently verify that Psychiatry is a science; but no. Apparently only Psychiatr[ist]s are registered to do that. This is actually *anti-science*, as science demands that everyone should be allowed to perform independent verification." | ||
"You derived your argument from a deduction of a definition forwarded by *one* Psychiatrist. It's important to collectivly get definitions of a Psychiatrist before making this type of deductive argument." | |||
You accuse me of making claims I never even contemplated to make. I never said that "let's trust only the expert-psychiatrists", nor did I say that "look! this one person said it, therefore it must be true!".</blockquote> | You accuse me of making claims I never even contemplated to make. I never said that "let's trust only the expert-psychiatrists", nor did I say that "look! this one person said it, therefore it must be true!".</blockquote> | ||