Topic on Talk:Freedom Road Socialist Organization

This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Amicchan in the topic "The Party is Opportunist" on Talk:Freedom Road Socialist Organization. You can see other versions of this post at its history page.

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 Different in what sense?
- Politicians in congress do not care about the proletariat, they are part of the duopoly to stop socialism from surging.
+{{quote|Politicians in congress do not care about the proletariat, they are part of the duopoly to stop socialism from surging.}}
-> And lone actions like these are influenced by the party and their indiciative of the party's real theory.
-I doubt the person who joined the server and the former prolewiki editor are any indication of the party itself. Especially the former prolewiki editor, who just recently joined the FRSO.
+So are local bourgeois politicians.
-{{quote|Also, no one tried to defend the PCUSA article when I edited it to state that they defended Patriotic Socialism and that they are therefore revisionist.}}
+{{quote|I doubt the person who joined the server and the former prolewiki editor are any indication of the party itself. Especially the former prolewiki editor, who just recently joined the FRSO.}}
+Well, it's still possible. Under historical materialism the group is a collection of individuals; therefore the individual can influence the collective and the collective can influence the individual.
+and what are you basing that doubt on?
 {{quote|False equivalence. Patsocism is proven to be a tailist, reactionary ideology.}}
-It's proven because the U.S is a settler colonial ideology.
+It's proven because the U.S is a settler colonial country.
 Likewise, it is proven that endorsing bourgeois parties will not help the working class. FRSO endorsing a fucking democrat, without any explanation for why this is necessary is therefore proof of opportunism.