Topic on Talk:Communist Party of the United States of America
From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
More actions
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Forte in the topic "Opportunism and electioneering" on Talk:Communist Party of the United States of America.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I disagree that participation in existing structures as an aspect of struggle and the aspiration of a peaceful revolution are proof of reformism or opportunism. There is of course the tendency not to put up one's own candidates as much as possible (which is incorrect), and decentralization that contributes to articles on their own website being not in line with principles (which should be more strictly applied), but I don't think the party is beyond saving. The most common and correct criticism is a formulaic demand to always vote for Democrats as the lesser evil in national elections rather than performing a creative assessment of conditions which lays out the times when it is strategic to vote for Democrats to advance Communist interests, and when it is strategic not to. Overall they have the problem of a lot of Western parties of neglecting to test new approaches and allowing too much leeway in adherence to the party line, with the sloganeering around the Constitution being in my view a policy comparable to the respect demanded of traditional leaders in order to win the people over. Long tangent, just saying I don't want to just remove the first two citations because that could be seen as hostile, so instead I'll just note my feelings here and hope we can come to an agreement. | <blockquote>"I disagree that participation in existing structures as an aspect of struggle and the aspiration of a peaceful revolution are proof of reformism or opportunism. There is of course the tendency not to put up one's own candidates as much as possible (which is incorrect), and decentralization that contributes to articles on their own website being not in line with principles (which should be more strictly applied), but I don't think the party is beyond saving. The most common and correct criticism is a formulaic demand to always vote for Democrats as the lesser evil in national elections rather than performing a creative assessment of conditions which lays out the times when it is strategic to vote for Democrats to advance Communist interests, and when it is strategic not to. Overall they have the problem of a lot of Western parties of neglecting to test new approaches and allowing too much leeway in adherence to the party line, with the sloganeering around the Constitution being in my view a policy comparable to the respect demanded of traditional leaders in order to win the people over. Long tangent, just saying I don't want to just remove the first two citations because that could be seen as hostile, so instead I'll just note my feelings here and hope we can come to an agreement."</blockquote>(discussion originally started by {{FlowMention|Robinn}}) | ||
(discussion originally started by {{FlowMention|Robinn}}) | |||