The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Historical revisionism''' is a phenomenon in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established or commonly-held view of | '''Historical revisionism''' is a phenomenon in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established or commonly-held view of historical events. This can be positive for the study of history when the conclusions reached are fact-based and follow the scientific method; or negative when they rely on incorrect, selective, or manipulated data. | ||
The label 'historical revisionist', much like '[[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theorist]]', is often used by [[ | The label 'historical revisionist', much like '[[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theorist]]', is often used by people (whose method of "historical research" is skimming [[Wikipedia]] articles) to dismiss different perspectives without examining the evidence for them. | ||
One modern example of historical revisionism is the way certain [[Capitalism|capitalist]] countries teach the [[Tibet Autonomous Region#Ancient history|history of Tibet]]. Tibet has been part of [[People's Republic of China|China]] since the | One modern example of historical revisionism is the way certain [[Capitalism|capitalist]] countries teach the [[Tibet Autonomous Region#Ancient history|history of Tibet]]. Tibet has been part of [[People's Republic of China|China]] since the Tang dynasty, over a thousand years ago. Yet it is described in [[Bourgois science|western history textbooks]] as being "invaded" by the CPC and forced to join modern China in the 1950s. This gross mischaracterization of Tibet's history is an example of [[Imperialism|imperialist countries]] supporting Chinese separatists, in an effort to balkanize the modern Chinese [[nation-state]]. | ||