Editing LGBT rights and issues in AES countries

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
Warning: You are not logged in, comrade. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be instead attributed to your username.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 5: Line 5:
Distinguishing between real problems faced by LGBT communities under AES, vs. anti-communist propaganda that seeks to use LGBT rights as a cover or vehicle for spreading misinformation and [[atrocity propaganda]] about AES countries, is a persistent issue in the discourse around this subject.
Distinguishing between real problems faced by LGBT communities under AES, vs. anti-communist propaganda that seeks to use LGBT rights as a cover or vehicle for spreading misinformation and [[atrocity propaganda]] about AES countries, is a persistent issue in the discourse around this subject.


It should be noted that many issues faced by LGBT communities in AES countries are not issues found uniquely under socialism, but may be faced by LGBT individuals and communities under various modes of production, including in capitalist societies, and a dialectical materialist analysis must be maintained to understand the development of LGBT rights worldwide.  Always keep in mind the [[Historical materialism|historical materialist]] attitude: collective discrimination of the LGBT community existed before [[Capitalism|capitalist society]] and will persist in a different form after those societies have been replaced by [[Socialism|socialist societies]]. Due to capitalist society's incessant need to [[Commodification|commodify]] and thereby further [[Exploitation|exploit]] working people, LGBT communities are commonly used as a source of new commodities to counter the [[tendency of the rate of profit to fall]] as well to confuse the working class via the [[divide and conquer]] strategies of the bourgeoise in modern [[class struggle]].  
It should be noted that many issues faced by LGBT communities in AES countries are not issues found uniquely under socialism, but may be faced by LGBT individuals and communities under various modes of production, including in capitalist societies, and a dialectical materialist analysis must be maintained to understand the development of LGBT rights worldwide.  Always keep in mind the [[Historical materialism|historical materialist]] attitude: collective descrimination of the LGBT community existed before [[Capitalism|capitalist society]] and will persist after it has been replaced by [[Socialism|socialist societies]]. Due to capitalist society's incessant need to [[Commodification|commodify]] and thereby further [[Exploitation|exploit]] working people, LGBT issues are commonly used as a source of commodities to counter the [[tendency of the rate of profit to fall]] as well as a cudgel in the [[divide and conquer]] strategies of the bourgeoise in the modern [[class struggle]].  


== Background information, context, and terminology ==
== Background information, context, and terminology ==
Line 33: Line 33:
Another related term is "pinkwashing" (similar to terms like whitewashing and [[greenwashing]]). Pinkwashing is the strategy of promoting LGBT rights protections as evidence of liberalism and democracy, especially to distract from or legitimize violence against other countries or communities. Pinkwashing is a continuation of the political rationale used to justify [[colonialism]] on the basis of LGBT rights.  
Another related term is "pinkwashing" (similar to terms like whitewashing and [[greenwashing]]). Pinkwashing is the strategy of promoting LGBT rights protections as evidence of liberalism and democracy, especially to distract from or legitimize violence against other countries or communities. Pinkwashing is a continuation of the political rationale used to justify [[colonialism]] on the basis of LGBT rights.  


In 2011, Sarah Schulman used the term ''pinkwashing'' in a widely read editorial in [[The New York Times|''The New York Times'']] citing [[State of Israel|Israel]] as an example of the use of the tactic of pinkwashing in public relations. Schulman states that after "generations of sacrifice and organization, gay people in parts of the world have won protection from discrimination and relationship recognition. But these changes have given rise to a nefarious phenomenon: the co-opting of white gay people by anti-immigrant and anti-[[Islam|Muslim]] political forces in Western Europe and Israel." Schulman says that an opportunistically selective depiction of usually Arab, South Asian, Turkish or African Muslim immigrants as "homophobic fanatics" is strategically contrasted against the "relevant and modern" marketing image of Israel, harnessing the gay community to reposition Israel's global image, summarizing the situation by saying that the "growing global gay movement against the Israeli occupation has named these tactics 'pinkwashing': a deliberate strategy to conceal the continuing violations of [[State of Palestine|Palestinians]]' human rights behind an image of modernity signified by Israeli gay life."<ref>{{News citation|author=By Sarah Schulman|newspaper=The New York Times|title=Israel and ‘Pinkwashing’|date=Nov. 22, 2011|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/opinion/pinkwashing-and-israels-use-of-gays-as-a-messaging-tool.html|quote=After generations of sacrifice and organization, gay people in parts of the world have won protection from discrimination and relationship recognition. But these changes have given rise to a nefarious phenomenon: the co-opting of white gay people by anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim political forces in Western Europe and Israel.}}</ref>
In 2011, Sarah Schulman used the term ''pinkwashing'' in a widely read ''[[The New York Times|New York Times]]'' editorial citing [[State of Israel|Israel]] as an example of the use of the tactic of pinkwashing in public relations. Schulman states that after "generations of sacrifice and organization, gay people in parts of the world have won protection from discrimination and relationship recognition. But these changes have given rise to a nefarious phenomenon: the co-opting of white gay people by anti-immigrant and anti-[[Islam|Muslim]] political forces in Western Europe and Israel." Schulman says that an opportunistically selective depiction of usually Arab, South Asian, Turkish or African Muslim immigrants as "homophobic fanatics" is strategically contrasted against the "relevant and modern" marketing image of Israel, harnessing the gay community to reposition Israel's global image, summarizing the situation by saying that the "growing global gay movement against the Israeli occupation has named these tactics 'pinkwashing': a deliberate strategy to conceal the continuing violations of [[State of Palestine|Palestinians]]' human rights behind an image of modernity signified by Israeli gay life."<ref>{{News citation|author=By Sarah Schulman|newspaper=The New York Times|title=Israel and ‘Pinkwashing’|date=Nov. 22, 2011|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/opinion/pinkwashing-and-israels-use-of-gays-as-a-messaging-tool.html|quote=After generations of sacrifice and organization, gay people in parts of the world have won protection from discrimination and relationship recognition. But these changes have given rise to a nefarious phenomenon: the co-opting of white gay people by anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim political forces in Western Europe and Israel.}}</ref>


In ''Anti-Pinkwashing as Emerging Hope,'' Sukrita Lahiri writes of the relationship between pinkwashing and imperial violence:<blockquote>Historically speaking, [[settler colonialism]] has a long history of articulating its violence through the protection of certain figures such as women and children (Moghadam, 1994), and now homosexuals. Pinkwashing is just one more justification for imperial violence within this long tradition which works in part by tapping into the discursive and structural circuits produced by the West against the danger of “Islamic extremism.” In persistence of this imperial tradition, Gayatri Spivak’s (2010) well-known precept “white men saving brown women from brown men” (p. 57) gets modified with the trope of white homosexuals saving brown homosexuals from brown heterosexuals (Morris, 2010). Further, the neoliberal economic structure comfortably stretches itself to induce a compartmentalised sort of marketing of various ethnic and minoritised groups (Fraser, 2013). Thus it normalises the production of, for example, a gay and lesbian tourism industry built on the distinction between “gay-friendly” and homophobic destinations. The human rights groups voicing homosexual concerns continue to proliferate Western constructs of identity that privilege identity politics, “coming out”, increased visibility, and legislative measures as the dominant scales of social inclusion and progress.<ref name=":11" /></blockquote>
In ''Anti-Pinkwashing as Emerging Hope,'' Sukrita Lahiri writes of the relationship between pinkwashing and imperial violence:<blockquote>Historically speaking, [[settler colonialism]] has a long history of articulating its violence through the protection of certain figures such as women and children (Moghadam, 1994), and now homosexuals. Pinkwashing is just one more justification for imperial violence within this long tradition which works in part by tapping into the discursive and structural circuits produced by the West against the danger of “Islamic extremism.” In persistence of this imperial tradition, Gayatri Spivak’s (2010) well-known precept “white men saving brown women from brown men” (p. 57) gets modified with the trope of white homosexuals saving brown homosexuals from brown heterosexuals (Morris, 2010). Further, the neoliberal economic structure comfortably stretches itself to induce a compartmentalised sort of marketing of various ethnic and minoritised groups (Fraser, 2013). Thus it normalises the production of, for example, a gay and lesbian tourism industry built on the distinction between “gay-friendly” and homophobic destinations. The human rights groups voicing homosexual concerns continue to proliferate Western constructs of identity that privilege identity politics, “coming out”, increased visibility, and legislative measures as the dominant scales of social inclusion and progress.<ref name=":11" /></blockquote>
Line 365: Line 365:
<references />
<references />
[[Category:Social issues]]
[[Category:Social issues]]
[[Category:LGBT+]]
[[Category:Pages to be protected]]
ProleWiki upholds the abolition of private property, including intellectual property, so feel free to publish any work at will.
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)