Editing Reform and Opening Up

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
Warning: You are not logged in, comrade. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be instead attributed to your username.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 282: Line 282:
Chinese robotic installations have grown rapidly, becoming the world leader in robotics by 2019. The fastest growth in robotics installation out of any country. By 2016, China has become the largest operational stock of robots.<ref>[https://ifr.org/news/robots-china-breaks-historic-records-in-automation/ China breaks historic records in automation]</ref>Even when compared to the USA, a supposed first world developed country, China's robot density (robots there are per 10,000 workers) outpaces them.<ref>[https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/china-overtakes-usa-in-robot-density China overtakes USA in robot density]</ref> China's commitment to automation can be seen in the rural sector, such as intelligent green houses with more commitment to robotizing the farming industries. With the mechanization rate in urban sectors at around 70% by 2020, the number is bound to increase.<ref>[https://www.hortidaily.com/article/9262170/automation-can-help-chinese-horticultural-industry/ Automation can help Chinese horticultural industry]</ref>
Chinese robotic installations have grown rapidly, becoming the world leader in robotics by 2019. The fastest growth in robotics installation out of any country. By 2016, China has become the largest operational stock of robots.<ref>[https://ifr.org/news/robots-china-breaks-historic-records-in-automation/ China breaks historic records in automation]</ref>Even when compared to the USA, a supposed first world developed country, China's robot density (robots there are per 10,000 workers) outpaces them.<ref>[https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/china-overtakes-usa-in-robot-density China overtakes USA in robot density]</ref> China's commitment to automation can be seen in the rural sector, such as intelligent green houses with more commitment to robotizing the farming industries. With the mechanization rate in urban sectors at around 70% by 2020, the number is bound to increase.<ref>[https://www.hortidaily.com/article/9262170/automation-can-help-chinese-horticultural-industry/ Automation can help Chinese horticultural industry]</ref>


Labor productivity improved dramatically after reforms too. Labour productivity per worker peaked in China in 1966, and went under periodic rises and dips over the course of 1966 to 1976. It was only in 1978 that industrial productivity beat the historical 1966 peak.<ref name=":2" /> For state enterprises, total factor productivity from 1980 - 1996 increased 1.7% per year, meaning a 27.2% increase within the 16 year span.<ref>Chinese Economic Development by Chris Bramall, page 416</ref> Compared to only 0.9% in 1965 to 1978.<ref>Chinese Economic Development, page 403 - Chris Bramall</ref> For light industry's output value grew by 8.7% per anum from 1952 to 1978. From 1978 - 1999, it grew 15.25%. For Heavy industry, it was 11.9% from 1952 to 1978, but 14.75% from 1978 to 1999.<ref>Chinese Economic Development, page 409, Chris Bramall</ref>
Labor productivity improved dramatically after reforms too. Labour productivity per worker peaked in China in 1966, and went under periodic rises and dips over the course of 1966 to 1976. It was only in 1978 that industrial productivity beat the historical 1966 peak.<ref name=":2" /> For state enterprises, total factor productivity from 1980 - 1996 increased 1.7% per year, meaning a 27.2% increase within the 16 year span.<ref>Chinese Economic Development by Chris Bramall, page 416</ref> Compared to only 0.9% in 1965 to 1978.


Between 1978 and 1998, Chinese value-added per worker in manufacturing more than doubled in real terms, and in the process rose more quickly than in any of Japan, the USA and Russia. A process of catch-up was under way, especially in respect of Russia; the ratio of Chinese to Russian labour productivity narrowed from 16 to 54 per cent, as a result of poor Russian and improved Chinese performance.<ref>China's Economic Development, page 417 by Chris Bramall</ref> Value added per worker from 1990 to 2003 increased by 600%. During the same time period, Brazil and Mexico had stagnant growth, not exceeding more than 20% during the same time period.<ref>[https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Labor-productivity-in-manufacturing-China-Brazil-and-Mexico-value-added-per-worker_fig4_4910563 Fear of China: Is There a Future for Manufacturing in Latin America? - Mauricio Mesquita Moreira]</ref>
Between 1978 and 1998, Chinese value-added per worker in manufacturing more than doubled in real terms, and in the process rose more quickly than in any of Japan, the USA and Russia. A process of catch-up was under way, especially in respect of Russia; the ratio of Chinese to Russian labour productivity narrowed from 16 to 54 per cent, as a result of poor Russian and improved Chinese performance.<ref>China's Economic Development, page 417 by Chris Bramall</ref> Value added per worker from 1990 to 2003 increased by 600%. During the same time period, Brazil and Mexico had stagnant growth, not exceeding more than 20% during the same time period.<ref>[https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Labor-productivity-in-manufacturing-China-Brazil-and-Mexico-value-added-per-worker_fig4_4910563 Fear of China: Is There a Future for Manufacturing in Latin America? - Mauricio Mesquita Moreira]</ref>


At the end of 1952, China's gross value added in manufacturing was 3.4% of the American level. By 1978, the gross value added in manufacturing of China was roughly around 14% of the USA's level. By the end of 1994, that number has risen to  45%. From 1952 - 1978, China's GVA as a percentage of the USA's grew by 10.6%. From 1978 to 1994, that number grew by 31%. This means that the GVA in manufacturing for China increased 2.9 fold post-reform compared to pre-reform. GVA per capita as a percentage of the USA was around 5.8% at the end of 1978 (with a 0.5% growth rate from 1952 to 1978), that number increased sharply by the end of 1994 with it being 9.5% (with a 3.7% growth rate from '78 to '94) This means that from 1978 to 1994, per capita growth increased 7 times over the pre 1978 level.<ref name=":3" />
At the end of 1952, China's gross value added in manufacturing was 3.4% of the American level. By 1978, the gross value added in manufacturing of China was roughly around 14% of the USA's level. By the end of 1994, that number has risen to  45%. From 1952 - 1978, China's GVA as a percentage of the USA's grew by 10.6%. From 1978 to 1994, that number grew by 31%. Gross value added per capita as a percentage of the USA was around 5.8% at the end of 1978 (with a 0.5% growth rate from 1952 to 1978), that number increased sharply by the end of 1994 with it being 9.5% (with a 3.7% growth rate from '78 to '94)<ref name=":3" />


From 1952 to 1978, labor productivity in industry and construction increased 2.11x, while from 1978 to 2003, it increased 6.21x. In yearly measurements, from 1978 to 2003 grew 6.5% per annum, compared to the 3.7% from 1952 to 1978.<ref name=":5">Chinese Econonomic Performance in the Long Run: 960–2030 AD by Angus Maddison, page 80</ref> Labor productivity as a percentage relative to the USA grew by 4.3% from 1978 to 1994, compared to 0.4% from 1952 to 1978.<ref name=":3" />
From 1952 to 1978, labor productivity in industry and construction increased 2.11x, while from 1978 to 2003, it increased 6.21x. In yearly measurements, from 1978 to 2003 grew 6.5% per annum, compared to the 3.7% from 1952 to 1978.<ref name=":5">Chinese Econonomic Performance in the Long Run: 960–2030 AD by Angus Maddison, page 80</ref> Labor productivity as a percentage relative to the USA grew by 4.3% from 1978 to 1994, compared to 0.4% from 1952 to 1978.<ref name=":3" />
Line 294: Line 294:
Chinese steel output quadrupled between 1980 and 2000, and from 2000 to 2006 rose from 128.5 million tons to 418.8 million tons, one-third of global production. Labor productivity at some Chinese steel firms exceeds Western productivity. In 2002, the top Chinese firms (which are SOEs) were able to outperform international standards. Achieving 395.35 kg of coal per ton for iron smelting compared to the international norm of 400 kg. And achieving  56 kwh of electricity per ton of electric furnace steel (versus a norm of 350 kwh/ton).<ref name=":0" />   
Chinese steel output quadrupled between 1980 and 2000, and from 2000 to 2006 rose from 128.5 million tons to 418.8 million tons, one-third of global production. Labor productivity at some Chinese steel firms exceeds Western productivity. In 2002, the top Chinese firms (which are SOEs) were able to outperform international standards. Achieving 395.35 kg of coal per ton for iron smelting compared to the international norm of 400 kg. And achieving  56 kwh of electricity per ton of electric furnace steel (versus a norm of 350 kwh/ton).<ref name=":0" />   


During the 14 years from 1978 to 1992, more than 700 advanced technologies were introduced and US$6 billion in foreign capital was utilized. In particular, two modern large steel enterprises, Baoshan Iron and Steel Corporation (launched in 1978 and put into operation in 1985) and Tianjin Seamless Steel Tube Corporation (launched in 1989 and put into operation in 1996), were established. Meanwhile, many old steel plants were rebuilt and restructured. These notable changes to the technology structure of the country's steel industry saw the gap between it and world-class practices narrow.           
During the 14 years from 1978 to 1992, more than 700 advanced technologies were introduced and US$6 billion in foreign capital was utilized. In particular, two modern large steel enterprises, Baoshan Iron and Steel Corporation (launched in 1978 and put into operation in 1985) and Tianjin Seamless Steel Tube Corporation (launched in 1989 and put into operation in 1996), were established. Meanwhile, many old steel plants were rebuilt and restruc- tured. These notable changes to the technology structure of the country's steel industry saw the gap between it and world-class practices narrow.           


In the years between 1978 to 1992 saw significant achievements in output. By 1992 there was a 1.6-fold increase in steel production; the domestic market share had increased by 17 per cent, the ratio of open-hearth steel-making to total steel-making was reduced to 11 per cent, the ratio of continuous casting to the total rose to 30 per cent, and the total production energy consumption per tonne of steel output fell to 1.6 tonnes of standard coal or by 62 per cent. This period saw the fastest structural adjustment of the steel industry.<ref>The Chinese Steel Industry's Transformation By Ligang Song, Haimin Liu, pp 4-7</ref>
In the years between 1978 to 1992 saw significant achievements in output. By 1992 there was a 1.6-fold increase in steel production; the domestic market share had increased by 17 per cent, the ratio of open-hearth steel-making to total steel-making was reduced to 11 per cent, the ratio of continuous casting to the total rose to 30 per cent, and the total production energy consumption per tonne of steel output fell to 1.6 tonnes of standard coal or by 62 per cent. This period saw the fastest structural adjustment of the steel industry.<ref>The Chinese Steel Industry's Transformation By Ligang Song, Haimin Liu, pp 4-7</ref>
ProleWiki upholds the abolition of private property, including intellectual property, so feel free to publish any work at will.
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: