Topic on Talk:Psychiatry

This is a permanent link to a single version of this post. This version is from 13 September 2022. You can see the differences from the previous version, or view other versions on the post history page.

What happened to "To conclude, I have nothing more to say to you."? You still responded back.

You did not disprove anything; you just keep assuming I, and my arguments, are wrong, which are better described as bulverism and appealing to the stone respectively.

I have wrote dozens of paragrapths and cited a large amont of sources that disprove you, yet after days of this conflict, you repeat the same lies and fabrications as before, and whenever I disprove you, you call me a "Revisionist" (considering how you used that term in past reactions to what I was saying, I don't think you know what it means) and cite Lemmygrad posts which claim that autism is "scientism".

"I have wrote dozens of paragrapths and cited a large amont of sources that disprove you"

13 (citations) is a large number? /joke

The amount of sources does not matter; your sources aren't good. Most of your sources on your supposedly "scientific" claims just repeat the same talking points without pointing towards any actual studies that prove so.

"you repeat the same lies and fabrications as before,"

What lies did I make? You don't elaborate on them; you don't provide further argumentation, you just appeal to the stone.

"and whenever I disprove you,"

Again, you didn't disprove my claim; you just accused my claims of being disproven without evidence, so it's appealing to the stone.

"you call me a "Revisionist" and cite Lemmygrad posts which claim that autism is "scientism"."

I called you a revisionist in context to your incorrect claims about Mao Zedong; and how you just deny that the bouregoisie seeks to harm the proletariat to abuse them further. I did not call you a revisionist when disproving the claim that "Psychiatry is a science".

"cite Lemmygrad posts which claim that autism is "scientism"."

Can you show me where?

If you attempt to pollute this page (or any other page concerning a scientific topic you do not like personally, which I suspect includes many other topics) with your disproven and fringe sources, they will not be tolerated, and removed, unless community consensus exists. I have concluded with wasting my time on you.

"If you attempt to pollute this page … with your disproven and fringe sources,"

Again, how are my sources disproven and fringe?

"(or any other page concerning a scientific topic you do not like personally, which I suspect includes many other topics)"

Nah, it's just Psychiatry I dislike.

"they will not be tolerated, and removed, unless community consensus exists."

Hopefully that community consensus won't just consist of you.