Slavery in the United States: Difference between revisions
More languages
More actions
mNo edit summary Tag: Visual edit |
General-KJ (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Washington and enslaved Africans.png|thumb|335x335px|Painting of George Washington and enslaved Africans on his estate.]]'''Slavery in the United States''' largely took the form of [[chattel slavery]], which was inherited from its colonial predecessor. The practice was prevalent in the [[United States]] from its independence in 1776 until the end of the [[Civil war|Civil War]] in 1865. Primarily employed in the South, enslaved [[Afro-Americans]] were the backbone of the [[plantation economy]] in the US. Throughout this period, enslaved African Americans were collectively reduced to commodities which could be bought and sold for the benefit of White slave owners and had the same legal rights as farm animals.<ref>[https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/national-expansion-and-reform-1815-1880/pre-civil-war-african-american-slavery/ Pre-Civil War African-American Slavery]</ref><ref>[https://njsbf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Theme-One-Background-Info-1.pdf What is Chattel Slavery and how did it dehumanize Black People?]</ref> After the abolition of chattel slavery in the aftermath of the [[Statesian Civil War|American Civil War]] and [[Reconstruction era|Reconstruction]], many of chattel slavery's socio-economic relationships endured through the developments of the [[Jim Crow economy]] and sharecropping.<ref>[https://eji.org/news/history-racial-injustice-sharecropping/ Sharecropping]</ref><ref>[https://wfpc.sanford.duke.edu/north-carolina/durham-food-history/sharecropping-black-land-acquisition-and-white-supremacy-1868-1900/ Sharecropping, Black Land Acquisition, and White Supremacy]</ref><ref>{{Citation|author=Ralph Shlomowitz|year=1979|title=The Origins of Southern Sharecropping|title-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3742755|publisher=Duke University Press}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|author=Wesley Allen Riddle|year=1995-96|title=The Origins of Black Sharecropping|title-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26475959|publisher=The Johns Hopkins University Press}}</ref> | [[File:Washington and enslaved Africans.png|thumb|335x335px|Painting of George Washington and enslaved Africans on his estate.]]'''Slavery in the United States''' largely took the form of [[chattel slavery]], which was inherited from its colonial predecessor. The practice was prevalent in the [[United States of America|United States]] from its independence in 1776 until the end of the [[Civil war|Civil War]] in 1865. Primarily employed in the South, enslaved [[Afro-Americans]] were the backbone of the [[plantation economy]] in the US. Throughout this period, enslaved African Americans were collectively reduced to commodities which could be bought and sold for the benefit of White slave owners and had the same legal rights as farm animals.<ref>[https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/national-expansion-and-reform-1815-1880/pre-civil-war-african-american-slavery/ Pre-Civil War African-American Slavery]</ref><ref>[https://njsbf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Theme-One-Background-Info-1.pdf What is Chattel Slavery and how did it dehumanize Black People?]</ref><ref>{{Citation|author=Robert E. Shalhope|year=1971|title=Race, Class, Slavery, and the Antebellum Southern Mind|title-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2206546|publisher=Southern Historical Association}}</ref> After the abolition of chattel slavery in the aftermath of the [[Statesian Civil War|American Civil War]] and [[Reconstruction era|Reconstruction]], many of chattel slavery's socio-economic relationships endured through the developments of the [[Jim Crow economy]] and sharecropping.<ref>[https://eji.org/news/history-racial-injustice-sharecropping/ Sharecropping]</ref><ref>[https://wfpc.sanford.duke.edu/north-carolina/durham-food-history/sharecropping-black-land-acquisition-and-white-supremacy-1868-1900/ Sharecropping, Black Land Acquisition, and White Supremacy]</ref><ref>{{Citation|author=Ralph Shlomowitz|year=1979|title=The Origins of Southern Sharecropping|title-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3742755|publisher=Duke University Press}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|author=Wesley Allen Riddle|year=1995-96|title=The Origins of Black Sharecropping|title-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26475959|publisher=The Johns Hopkins University Press}}</ref> | ||
Prior to the formation of the United States the region had already developed and institutionalized a strict racial caste network built on White racial supremacy over African people. After the independence of the thirteen colonies, abolitionist legislation was gradually implemented in northern states where dependence on slave labor was minimal. As abolitionist movements arose in the aftermath of the American Revolution, supporters of slavery were granted concessions through the three-fifths compromise; a constitutional clause which made southern political power disproportionate in the US House of Representatives and Electoral College by counting Africans in America 3/5ths a person on the US Census.<ref>[https://perspectivesofchange.hms.harvard.edu/node/87#:~:text=The%20Three%2DFifths%20Compromise%20was,for%20legislative%20representation%20and%20taxation. The Three-Fifths Compromise]</ref><ref>[https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=163 The Three Fifths Compromise]</ref><ref>[https://www.thoughtco.com/three-fifths-compromise-4588466 The History of the Three Fifths Compromise]</ref> Despite the Jefferson administration's ban on the importation of slaves, it's enforcement was sporadic and ineffective and smuggling was common practice.<ref>[https://www.perlego.com/book/919800/opposing-the-slavers-the-royal-navys-campaign-against-the-atlantic-slave-trade-pdf Opposing the Slavers: The Royal Navy's Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade]</ref> | Prior to the formation of the United States the region had already developed and institutionalized a strict racial caste network built on White racial supremacy over African people. After the independence of the thirteen colonies, abolitionist legislation was gradually implemented in northern states where dependence on slave labor was minimal. As abolitionist movements arose in the aftermath of the American Revolution, supporters of slavery were granted concessions through the three-fifths compromise; a constitutional clause which made southern political power disproportionate in the US House of Representatives and Electoral College by counting Africans in America 3/5ths a person on the US Census.<ref>[https://perspectivesofchange.hms.harvard.edu/node/87#:~:text=The%20Three%2DFifths%20Compromise%20was,for%20legislative%20representation%20and%20taxation. The Three-Fifths Compromise]</ref><ref>[https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=163 The Three Fifths Compromise]</ref><ref>[https://www.thoughtco.com/three-fifths-compromise-4588466 The History of the Three Fifths Compromise]</ref> Despite the Jefferson administration's ban on the importation of slaves, it's enforcement was sporadic and ineffective and smuggling was common practice.<ref>[https://www.perlego.com/book/919800/opposing-the-slavers-the-royal-navys-campaign-against-the-atlantic-slave-trade-pdf Opposing the Slavers: The Royal Navy's Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade]</ref> | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Contrary to a commonly held belief of the time that the peculiar institution would die down, the invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney and the subsequent mechanization of the seed separation process led to the dramatic rise in the cotton productivity and demand for slaves. As a result of this new growing labor demand, enslaved Africans were often sold and transported from the Upper South to Deep South plantations. Coinciding with US territorial expansion, planter elites made efforts to expand slavery into new territories, resulting in the formation of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] in 1854. Tensions between the north and south continued as the Republicans gradually obtained political power in northern states and pushed for limiting slavery's expansion while the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]] and its [[Southern Aristocracy]] supporters saw the Republicans as a threat to chattel slavery. In the midst of developing tensions between the two camps, religious denominations split over the issue of slavery into regional organizations of the North and South. | Contrary to a commonly held belief of the time that the peculiar institution would die down, the invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney and the subsequent mechanization of the seed separation process led to the dramatic rise in the cotton productivity and demand for slaves. As a result of this new growing labor demand, enslaved Africans were often sold and transported from the Upper South to Deep South plantations. Coinciding with US territorial expansion, planter elites made efforts to expand slavery into new territories, resulting in the formation of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] in 1854. Tensions between the north and south continued as the Republicans gradually obtained political power in northern states and pushed for limiting slavery's expansion while the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]] and its [[Southern Aristocracy]] supporters saw the Republicans as a threat to chattel slavery. In the midst of developing tensions between the two camps, religious denominations split over the issue of slavery into regional organizations of the North and South. | ||
The elevation of [[Abraham Lincoln]] into the Presidency in 1860 on the platform of halting the expansion of slavery was the catalyst for the development of the [[Confederate States of America (1861–1865)|Confederate States of America]], starting with the succession of [[South Carolina]] which broke off from the Union before Lincoln's confirmation. At the inception of the Confederacy, 1/3rd of its inhabitants were enslaved Africans<ref name=":0">{{Citation|author=Harry L. Watson|year=1985|title=Conflict and Collaboration: Yeomen, Slaveholders, and Politics in the Antebellum South|title-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4285456|publisher=Taylor & Francis, Ltd}}</ref> and the states of [[Mississippi]] and South Carolina held a solid Afro-American majority.<ref>[https://raogk.org/census-records/1860-census/ 1860 Census: Population of the United States]</ref> In response to the siege of Fort Sumter by South Carolina militias, the Lincoln Administration called for a seventy-five thousand man militia to suppress the Confederate States. Wartime developments like the Emancipation Proclamation | The elevation of [[Abraham Lincoln]] into the Presidency in 1860 on the platform of halting the expansion of slavery was the catalyst for the development of the [[Confederate States of America (1861–1865)|Confederate States of America]], starting with the succession of [[South Carolina]] which broke off from the Union before Lincoln's confirmation. At the inception of the Confederacy, 1/3rd of its inhabitants were enslaved Africans<ref name=":0">{{Citation|author=Harry L. Watson|year=1985|title=Conflict and Collaboration: Yeomen, Slaveholders, and Politics in the Antebellum South|title-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4285456|publisher=Taylor & Francis, Ltd}}</ref> and the states of [[Mississippi]] and South Carolina held a solid Afro-American majority.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=United States Census Bureau|title=1860 Census: Population of the United States|url=https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1864/dec/1860a.html}}</ref><ref>[https://raogk.org/census-records/1860-census/ 1860 Census: Population of the United States]</ref> In response to the siege of Fort Sumter by South Carolina militias, the Lincoln Administration called for a seventy-five thousand man militia to suppress the Confederate States. Wartime developments like the Emancipation Proclamation gradually ended chattel slavery in most of the south.<ref>{{Citation|author=Henry Epps|year=2012|title=A Concise Chronicle History of the African-American People Experience in America|title-url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_Concise_Chronicle_History_of_the_Afric/qUTrAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Those+20,000+slaves+were+freed+immediately+by+the+Emancipation+Proclamation.&pg=PA109&printsec=frontcover|publisher=Lulu.com}}</ref><ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=visitthecapitol.gov|title=President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1863, freed all slaves in Confederate-controlled territory|url=https://www.visitthecapitol.gov/artifact/president-lincolns-emancipation-proclamation-january-1-1863-freed-all-slaves-confederate}}</ref> Chattel slavery would persist in Kentucky until December 1965 as a result of the ratification of the 13th amendment<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Equal Justice Initiative|title=Kentucky Refuses to Ratify Abolition of Slavery|url=https://calendar.eji.org/racial-injustice/feb/24#:~:text=On%20February%2024%2C%201865%2C%20the,except%20as%20punishment%20for%20crime.|quote=Kentucky legislators continued to oppose all efforts to abolish slavery in the coming years, and on February 24, 1865, the Kentucky General Assembly rejected the Thirteenth Amendment. Prominent politicians and other public figures harshly criticized President Lincoln and members of Congress, and the Kentucky legislature expressed their disapproval of the amendment's adoption by politically siding with the former Confederacy throughout the post-Civil War era. Kentucky did not officially adopt the Thirteenth Amendment until 1976.}}</ref><ref>{{Web citation|author=Karen Nikos-Rose|newspaper=UCDAVIS|title=Juneteenth Marks End of a Sustained Slavery That Lasted Beyond Emancipation Proclamation|date=2020-07-19|url=https://www.ucdavis.edu/curiosity/news/juneteenth-marks-end-sustained-slavery-lasted-beyond-emancipation-proclamation#:~:text=Downs%20agreed.,of%20which%20came%20months%20later.%E2%80%9D|quote=Downs agreed. “In fact,” he added, “slavery did not end in Kentucky and Delaware until December 1865 when enough states ratified the 13th Amendment. Thus the day of June 19, 1865, was an important day in the end of slavery, but in a spectrum of other important days, some of which came months later.”}}</ref>, which despite abolishing chattel slavery in the US it also served as a legal pretext to forced labor in prisons.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Constitution Annotated|title=Thirteenth Amendment|url=https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-13/|quote=Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|author=Jaron Browne|year=2007|title=Rooted in Slavery: Prison Labor Exploitation|title-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41555136|publisher=Reimagine!}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|author=Kim Gilmore|year=2000|title=Slavery and Prison — Understanding the Connections|title-url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/29767242|publisher=Social Justice/Global Options}}</ref> | ||
=== Origins === | === Origins === | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
[[Category:Slavery]] [[Category:United States of America]] |
Latest revision as of 19:49, 16 November 2024
Slavery in the United States largely took the form of chattel slavery, which was inherited from its colonial predecessor. The practice was prevalent in the United States from its independence in 1776 until the end of the Civil War in 1865. Primarily employed in the South, enslaved Afro-Americans were the backbone of the plantation economy in the US. Throughout this period, enslaved African Americans were collectively reduced to commodities which could be bought and sold for the benefit of White slave owners and had the same legal rights as farm animals.[1][2][3] After the abolition of chattel slavery in the aftermath of the American Civil War and Reconstruction, many of chattel slavery's socio-economic relationships endured through the developments of the Jim Crow economy and sharecropping.[4][5][6][7]
Prior to the formation of the United States the region had already developed and institutionalized a strict racial caste network built on White racial supremacy over African people. After the independence of the thirteen colonies, abolitionist legislation was gradually implemented in northern states where dependence on slave labor was minimal. As abolitionist movements arose in the aftermath of the American Revolution, supporters of slavery were granted concessions through the three-fifths compromise; a constitutional clause which made southern political power disproportionate in the US House of Representatives and Electoral College by counting Africans in America 3/5ths a person on the US Census.[8][9][10] Despite the Jefferson administration's ban on the importation of slaves, it's enforcement was sporadic and ineffective and smuggling was common practice.[11]
Contrary to a commonly held belief of the time that the peculiar institution would die down, the invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney and the subsequent mechanization of the seed separation process led to the dramatic rise in the cotton productivity and demand for slaves. As a result of this new growing labor demand, enslaved Africans were often sold and transported from the Upper South to Deep South plantations. Coinciding with US territorial expansion, planter elites made efforts to expand slavery into new territories, resulting in the formation of the Republican Party in 1854. Tensions between the north and south continued as the Republicans gradually obtained political power in northern states and pushed for limiting slavery's expansion while the Democratic Party and its Southern Aristocracy supporters saw the Republicans as a threat to chattel slavery. In the midst of developing tensions between the two camps, religious denominations split over the issue of slavery into regional organizations of the North and South.
The elevation of Abraham Lincoln into the Presidency in 1860 on the platform of halting the expansion of slavery was the catalyst for the development of the Confederate States of America, starting with the succession of South Carolina which broke off from the Union before Lincoln's confirmation. At the inception of the Confederacy, 1/3rd of its inhabitants were enslaved Africans[12] and the states of Mississippi and South Carolina held a solid Afro-American majority.[13][14] In response to the siege of Fort Sumter by South Carolina militias, the Lincoln Administration called for a seventy-five thousand man militia to suppress the Confederate States. Wartime developments like the Emancipation Proclamation gradually ended chattel slavery in most of the south.[15][16] Chattel slavery would persist in Kentucky until December 1965 as a result of the ratification of the 13th amendment[17][18], which despite abolishing chattel slavery in the US it also served as a legal pretext to forced labor in prisons.[19][20][21]
Origins[edit | edit source]
Black ''American'' African Ancestry[edit | edit source]
Conditions[edit | edit source]
Middle Passage[edit | edit source]
The First Enslaved Peoples[edit | edit source]
Slavery in British America[edit | edit source]
John Punch Case[edit | edit source]
Slavery in the American Colonies[edit | edit source]
Slave Codes[edit | edit source]
Enslaved People during the American Revolution[edit | edit source]
Slave Rebellions and Black Americans in Slave Society[edit | edit source]
The United States Constitution with the Issue of Slavery[edit | edit source]
White Settler Colonialism's Justifications for Slavery and White Supremacy[edit | edit source]
''Logical'' Justification[edit | edit source]
Yeoman farmers, who typically did not own slave labor, made up the majority of whites in southern society. They generally believed in and sided with the institution of slavery but also occasionally challenged the goals of the planter elite; especially on the western frontier of the U.S where they advocated for the gradual abolition of slavery. In efforts to justify the existence of the peculiar institution, southern aristocrats often sponsored white supremacist campaigns in both media and academia. With the three-fifths compromise, giving elite whites political power in congress, white elite planters also consolidated power, by making loans to those in need, hiring poor whites for work, as well as using resources to transport crops of yeoman farmers to the market. Even if some yeoman farmers didn't participate in the institution of slavery, they had major incentives not to end it because white settler colonial elites had made white society dependent upon themselves. White settler-colonialism, and its justification for the institution for slavery, was a political and economic move, to coerce, and influence those in slavery, and those who didn't contribute to slavery as much as actual slave owners, to disprove the evils, and horrors of slavery and to justify its evil to end it. The white settler elite created the idea of white supremacy to uphold white society together under elitist control. The idea that all whites were equal and superior towards black African slaves, was not in question due to the lower, and poor white farmers, who either did or did not support the idea of white supremacy, not having any benefits to opposing the idea of it, since the elite white farmers did in fact keep the yeoman poor farmers alive, and sustainable.[12][22][23] Two justifying phrases include those that explain slavery, as a ''necessary evil'' or a ''positive good''. John C. Calhoun noted that:
''I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good - positive good... There never has yet existed a wealthy and civilized society in which one portion of the community did not, in point of fact, live on the labor of the other. Broad and general as is this assertion, it is fully borne out by history... I fearlessly assert that the existing relation between the two races in the South, against which these blind fanatics are waging war, forms the most solid and durable foundation on which to rear free and stable political institutions.''
Explaining the ''inherent'', and ''moral'', as well as, ''necessary'', domination of the white race over the black, race bound southern society together. The planter elite and forged a unbreakable tie with the lower white classes and established a stronghold on southern culture.
White Settler Colonialism's Religious Justification, Quakers, & Counterarguments[edit | edit source]
George Fox[edit | edit source]
Germantown Quaker Protest & Petition Against Slavery[edit | edit source]
Enslaved Women in America[edit | edit source]
Phillis Wheatley[edit | edit source]
The Underground Railroad[edit | edit source]
Abolitionist Movement[edit | edit source]
Black Americans During the Civil War[edit | edit source]
Emancipation Proclamation[edit | edit source]
Reconstruction[edit | edit source]
[edit | edit source]
Jim Crow Era[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Pre-Civil War African-American Slavery
- ↑ What is Chattel Slavery and how did it dehumanize Black People?
- ↑ Robert E. Shalhope (1971). Race, Class, Slavery, and the Antebellum Southern Mind. Southern Historical Association.
- ↑ Sharecropping
- ↑ Sharecropping, Black Land Acquisition, and White Supremacy
- ↑ Ralph Shlomowitz (1979). The Origins of Southern Sharecropping. Duke University Press.
- ↑ Wesley Allen Riddle (1995-96). The Origins of Black Sharecropping. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
- ↑ The Three-Fifths Compromise
- ↑ The Three Fifths Compromise
- ↑ The History of the Three Fifths Compromise
- ↑ Opposing the Slavers: The Royal Navy's Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Harry L. Watson (1985). Conflict and Collaboration: Yeomen, Slaveholders, and Politics in the Antebellum South. Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
- ↑ "1860 Census: Population of the United States". United States Census Bureau.
- ↑ 1860 Census: Population of the United States
- ↑ Henry Epps (2012). A Concise Chronicle History of the African-American People Experience in America. Lulu.com.
- ↑ "President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1863, freed all slaves in Confederate-controlled territory". visitthecapitol.gov.
- ↑ “Kentucky legislators continued to oppose all efforts to abolish slavery in the coming years, and on February 24, 1865, the Kentucky General Assembly rejected the Thirteenth Amendment. Prominent politicians and other public figures harshly criticized President Lincoln and members of Congress, and the Kentucky legislature expressed their disapproval of the amendment's adoption by politically siding with the former Confederacy throughout the post-Civil War era. Kentucky did not officially adopt the Thirteenth Amendment until 1976.”
"Kentucky Refuses to Ratify Abolition of Slavery". Equal Justice Initiative. - ↑ “Downs agreed. “In fact,” he added, “slavery did not end in Kentucky and Delaware until December 1865 when enough states ratified the 13th Amendment. Thus the day of June 19, 1865, was an important day in the end of slavery, but in a spectrum of other important days, some of which came months later.””
Karen Nikos-Rose (2020-07-19). "Juneteenth Marks End of a Sustained Slavery That Lasted Beyond Emancipation Proclamation" UCDAVIS. - ↑ “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”
"Thirteenth Amendment". Constitution Annotated. - ↑ Jaron Browne (2007). Rooted in Slavery: Prison Labor Exploitation. Reimagine!.
- ↑ Kim Gilmore (2000). Slavery and Prison — Understanding the Connections. Social Justice/Global Options.
- ↑ David Brown (2013). A Vagabond's Tale: Poor Whites, Herrenvolk Democracy, and the Value of Whiteness in the Late Antebellum South. Southern Historical Association.
- ↑ Eugene D. Genovese (1975). Yeomen Farmers in a Slaveholders' Democracy. Duke University Press.