More languages
More actions
(Created page with "The terms 'lesbian', 'gay', etc, aren't always used to imply "exclusivity". Especially in the transgender community where gender is often fluid or at least non-binary, it's ha...") |
(→Appreciation and lack of references: new section) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The terms 'lesbian', 'gay', etc, aren't always used to imply "exclusivity". Especially in the transgender community where gender is often fluid or at least non-binary, it's hard to say what being "exclusively homosexual" might mean. Perhaps these labels are getting archaic, but I digress. — ''Comrade [[User:MxAsh|MxAsh]]'' <sup>([[User talk:MxAsh|talk]])</sup> 00:29, 28 November 2020 (-03) | The terms 'lesbian', 'gay', etc, aren't always used to imply "exclusivity". Especially in the transgender community where gender is often fluid or at least non-binary, it's hard to say what being "exclusively homosexual" might mean. Perhaps these labels are getting archaic, but I digress. — ''Comrade [[User:MxAsh|MxAsh]]'' <sup>([[User talk:MxAsh|talk]])</sup> 00:29, 28 November 2020 (-03) | ||
* Maybe I [https://prolewiki.org/index.php?title=LGBTQ%2B&type=revision&diff=4064&oldid=4061 fixed it] — ''Comrade [[User:MxAsh|MxAsh]]'' <sup>([[User talk:MxAsh|talk]])</sup> 00:38, 28 November 2020 (-03) | |||
== Outdated term == | |||
I kinda agree with you, comrade {{Reply to|MxAsh}}. It's a very large spectrum of gender, but for lack of a better term, I think we should use LGBT/LGBTI for now. Your edit in the article is very good by the way :) | |||
--— ''Comrade [[User:Andassol|Andassol]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Andassol|talk]])</sup> 12:39, 28 November 2020 (-03) | |||
== Lack of references == | |||
Comrade {{Reply to|Faust}} try to add references to the article when adding content to it, please. Thank you :) | |||
--— ''Comrade [[User:Andassol|Andassol]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Andassol|talk]])</sup> 00:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Appreciation and lack of references == | |||
Comrade {{Reply to|ComradeToph}} thank you very much for adding content about the CPGB-"ML" party, I appreciate it a lot. Just try to add references to the article too, please. Thanks again :) | |||
--— ''Comrade [[User:Andassol|Andassol]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Andassol|talk]])</sup> 03:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:10, 2 December 2020
The terms 'lesbian', 'gay', etc, aren't always used to imply "exclusivity". Especially in the transgender community where gender is often fluid or at least non-binary, it's hard to say what being "exclusively homosexual" might mean. Perhaps these labels are getting archaic, but I digress. — Comrade MxAsh (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2020 (-03)
Outdated term[edit source]
I kinda agree with you, comrade @MxAsh:. It's a very large spectrum of gender, but for lack of a better term, I think we should use LGBT/LGBTI for now. Your edit in the article is very good by the way :) --— Comrade Andassol (talk) 12:39, 28 November 2020 (-03)
Lack of references[edit source]
Comrade @Faust: try to add references to the article when adding content to it, please. Thank you :) --— Comrade Andassol (talk) 00:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Appreciation and lack of references[edit source]
Comrade @ComradeToph: thank you very much for adding content about the CPGB-"ML" party, I appreciate it a lot. Just try to add references to the article too, please. Thanks again :) --— Comrade Andassol (talk) 03:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)