More languages
More actions
m (→Outdated term) |
(→Appreciation and lack of references: new section) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I kinda agree with you, comrade {{Reply to|MxAsh}}. It's a very large spectrum of gender, but for lack of a better term, I think we should use LGBT/LGBTI for now. Your edit in the article is very good by the way :) | I kinda agree with you, comrade {{Reply to|MxAsh}}. It's a very large spectrum of gender, but for lack of a better term, I think we should use LGBT/LGBTI for now. Your edit in the article is very good by the way :) | ||
--— ''Comrade [[User:Andassol|Andassol]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Andassol|talk]])</sup> 12:39, 28 November 2020 (-03) | |||
== Lack of references == | |||
Comrade {{Reply to|Faust}} try to add references to the article when adding content to it, please. Thank you :) | |||
--— ''Comrade [[User:Andassol|Andassol]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Andassol|talk]])</sup> 00:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Appreciation and lack of references == | |||
Comrade {{Reply to|ComradeToph}} thank you very much for adding content about the CPGB-"ML" party, I appreciate it a lot. Just try to add references to the article too, please. Thanks again :) | |||
--— ''Comrade [[User:Andassol|Andassol]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Andassol|talk]])</sup> 03:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:10, 2 December 2020
The terms 'lesbian', 'gay', etc, aren't always used to imply "exclusivity". Especially in the transgender community where gender is often fluid or at least non-binary, it's hard to say what being "exclusively homosexual" might mean. Perhaps these labels are getting archaic, but I digress. — Comrade MxAsh (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2020 (-03)
Outdated term[edit source]
I kinda agree with you, comrade @MxAsh:. It's a very large spectrum of gender, but for lack of a better term, I think we should use LGBT/LGBTI for now. Your edit in the article is very good by the way :) --— Comrade Andassol (talk) 12:39, 28 November 2020 (-03)
Lack of references[edit source]
Comrade @Faust: try to add references to the article when adding content to it, please. Thank you :) --— Comrade Andassol (talk) 00:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Appreciation and lack of references[edit source]
Comrade @ComradeToph: thank you very much for adding content about the CPGB-"ML" party, I appreciate it a lot. Just try to add references to the article too, please. Thanks again :) --— Comrade Andassol (talk) 03:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)