Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Democracy: Difference between revisions

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
More languages
(punctuation)
Tag: Visual edit
(Some stufffvv)
Tag: Visual edit
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Democracy''', as of common consensus, as a concept was formally conceived by the ancient Greeks. The word “democracy” comes from two Greek words being: people (''demos''), and rule (''kratos''). By popular definition, democracy is a method of rule wherein the populace have common power, as in the people have an active role within the steering and guidance of the state. Contrary to common conception, “democracy” is not a system within itself, but a basis upon which political organizations and structures are formed. Democracy became the method of rule within Athens, a part of the [[Base and superstructure|superstructure]], so to speak, however within the bounds of the [[Base and superstructure|material base]]. Thereby referring to [[Slavery|slave society]], the only persons eligible to participate were so-called “free men”, this not including women, children, and slaves. This being the majority of the populace.
'''Democracy''', as of common consensus, as a concept, was formally conceived by the ancient Greeks. The word “democracy” comes from two Greek words being: people (''demos''), and rule (''kratos''). By popular definition, democracy is a method of rule wherein the populace have common power, as in the people have an active role within the steering and guidance of the state. Contrary to common conception, “democracy” is not a system within itself, but a basis upon which political organizations and structures are formed. Democracy became the method of rule within Athens, a part of the [[Base and superstructure|superstructure]], so to speak, however within the bounds of the [[Base and superstructure|material base]]. Thereby referring to [[Slavery|slave society]], the only persons eligible to participate were so-called “free men”, this not including women, children, and slaves. This being the majority of the populace.


{{quote|'''Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners.'''|[[Vladimir Lenin|Vladimir Ilyich Lenin]]}}
{{quote|'''Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners.'''|[[Vladimir Lenin|Vladimir Ilyich Lenin]]}}
== Interpretations of Democracy ==
Democracy in modernity has been split into many categories and has been countlessly interpreted and, at times, vulgarized by bourgeois thinkers. It may be noted that “democracy”, in all of its forms, are indeed a progressive force comparatively to the political systems proceeding it. Even the simplest liberal democracy serving the interests of the ruling class, is still superior to a direct dictatorship by class interests.

Revision as of 11:58, 22 November 2022

Democracy, as of common consensus, as a concept, was formally conceived by the ancient Greeks. The word “democracy” comes from two Greek words being: people (demos), and rule (kratos). By popular definition, democracy is a method of rule wherein the populace have common power, as in the people have an active role within the steering and guidance of the state. Contrary to common conception, “democracy” is not a system within itself, but a basis upon which political organizations and structures are formed. Democracy became the method of rule within Athens, a part of the superstructure, so to speak, however within the bounds of the material base. Thereby referring to slave society, the only persons eligible to participate were so-called “free men”, this not including women, children, and slaves. This being the majority of the populace.

Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners.

Vladimir Ilyich Lenin


Interpretations of Democracy

Democracy in modernity has been split into many categories and has been countlessly interpreted and, at times, vulgarized by bourgeois thinkers. It may be noted that “democracy”, in all of its forms, are indeed a progressive force comparatively to the political systems proceeding it. Even the simplest liberal democracy serving the interests of the ruling class, is still superior to a direct dictatorship by class interests.