Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Social-imperialism: Difference between revisions

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
More languages
(Removed bias)
Tag: Visual edit
m (Added categories)
Line 16: Line 16:


== References ==
== References ==
[[Category:Hoxhaism]]
[[Category:Anti-revisionism]]

Revision as of 10:08, 18 March 2023

Social-imperialism is a term commonly used by Anti-revisionists as explanation that socialist states like the Soviet Union after Stalin and China after Mao Zedong had become imperialist.

History

The term originated in a one-off quote by Vladimir Lenin, where he describes the liberal social democractic SPD as "socialist in name, imperialist in deeds"[1]; afterward, the term was not used again until it was reintroduced by Mao after the Sino-Soviet split, used to describe the post-Stalin USSR as a "Hitlerite imperialist state". It saw further use by Enver Hoxha, for example in his treatise "Imperialism and the Revolution"; notably, neither Mao nor Hoxha ever explained what the material basis of a "social-imperialist" state would be, and what the social formation of such a state looked like.

References

  1. ““Social-Democratic” Party of Germany are justly called “social-imperialists,” that is, socialists in words and imperialists in deeds;”

    V.I. Lenin (1916). Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism: 'CRITIQUE OF IMPERIALISM'. [PDF]