Difference between the Democritean and Epicurean philosophy of nature (Karl Marx)

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
Revision as of 17:21, 2 July 2024 by General-KJ (talk | contribs) (Created contents page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Difference between the Democritean and Epicurean philosophy of nature
AuthorKarl Marx
Written in1840 and March 1841
First published1902
TypeBook

Background

Dedication

Foreword

Part One: Difference between the Democritean and Epicurean philosophy of nature in general

I. The Subject of the Treatise

II. Opinions on the Relationship Between Democritean and Epicurean Physics

III. Difficulties Concerning the Identity of the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature

IV. General Difference in Principle Between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature

V. Result

Part Two: Difference between the Democritean and Epicurean philosophy of nature in detail

Chapter One: The Declination of the Atom from the Straight Line

Chapter Two: The Qualities of the Atom

Chapter Three. "Atouoi apxi and atoua otolxeia"

Chapter Four: Time

Chapter Five: The Meteors

Appendix: Critique of Plutarch's polemic against the theology of Epicurus

I. The Relationship of Man to God

1. Fear and the Being Beyond

2. Cult and the Individual

3. Providence and the Degraded God

II. Individual Immortality

1. On Religious Feudalism. The Hell of the Populace

2. The Longing of the Multitude

3. The Pride of the Elected

Retrieved from "https://en.prolewiki.org/index.php?title=Library:Difference_between_the_Democritean_and_Epicurean_philosophy_of_nature&oldid=69376"