This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Wisconcom in the topic "Anti-Scientific Content" on Talk:Psychiatry.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
''"This claim is just incorrect; psychiatric drugs are placebos and they have been proven to be so."'' | ''"This claim is just incorrect; psychiatric drugs are placebos and they have been proven to be so."'' | ||
By Whom? Why do you insist upon citing the same fringe sources? If psychiatric drugs were merely placebos, why are they still used commonly? I suspect that if this were to be true, *somebody* have figured out that such drugs are useless, as the placebo effect can only go so far, particularly when a mental disorder is of particular severity. I have looked at your sources many times, and they all are from the same discredited people, who repeat the same discredited assertions, yet, even if I did not, I still, from logic alone, understand that this is impossable. | By Whom? Why do you insist upon citing the same fringe sources? If psychiatric drugs were merely placebos, why are they still used commonly? I suspect that if this were to be true, *somebody* would have figured out that such drugs are useless, as the placebo effect can only go so far, particularly when a mental disorder is of particular severity. I have looked at your sources many times, and they all are from the same discredited people, who repeat the same discredited assertions, yet, even if I did not, I still, from logic alone, understand that this is impossable. | ||
''"This is completely irrelevant to what I was saying. It does not matter if the topic is related to science; the learner '''must''' understand science to apply it properly."'' | ''"This is completely irrelevant to what I was saying. It does not matter if the topic is related to science; the learner '''must''' understand science to apply it properly."'' | ||