> So, what would count as "enough" evidence?
The fact you want a precise number suggests that you know very little about evidence. Evidence can determine if an organisation is revisionist or not. The more evidence, the better. More evidence means there's a better idea to determine the organisation as revisionist. I'm not looking for a specific number. I don't care enough for a specific number. The more evidence, the better.
> Claiming to be Marxist does not automatically make them Marxist.
Yes. I never stated they were marxist based on a claim. I stated they were revolutionary.
> Why can't they get off their asses and get communist politicians;
FRSO does not believe in reform. FRSO believes in revolution. They employ grassroots actions, such as employing the mass line. They have an entire article dedicated to the mass line as I shown earlier.
> Also, where is your proof that Geoffrey Young is an anti-imperialist?
Geoffrey Young denounces the Ukraine war and claims the Democratic Party is fascist. https://twitter.com/GeoffYoung4KY/status/1605593373229711360 In regards to him turning pro-imperialist after elections, there is no evidence to suggest that will happen yet. He is only a local politician, not one that runs congress.
> The Democratic Party is pro-imperialist.
Yes? I'm not denying that. But keep in mind local democrat politicians are not the same as politicians in congress. Politicians in congress do not care about the proletariat, they are part of the duopoly to stop socialism from surging.
> And lone actions like these are influenced by the party and their indiciative of the party's real theory.
I doubt the person who joined the server and the former prolewiki editor are any indication of the party itself. Especially the former prolewiki editor, who just recently joined the FRSO.
> Also, no one tried to defend the PCUSA article when I edited it to state that they defended Patriotic Socialism and that they are therefore revisionist.
False equivalence. Patsocism is proven to be a tailist, reactionary ideology. PCUSA should be denounced in regards to supporting these measures. This is nowhere near the same as supporting a local democrat.
If you can provide more evidence which is more likely to suggest that FRSO is revisionist, then please do. I am not here to defend FRSO. If they are revisionist, then provide evidence for it.