Editing Republic of Zimbabwe

{{infobox country|name=Republic of Zimbabwe|native_name=Nyika yeZimbabwe<br/>Ilizwe leZimbabwe<br/>Dziko la Zimbabwe<br/>Nyika ye Zimbabwe<br/>Hango yeZimbabwe<br/>Zimbabwe Nù<br/>Inyika yeZimbabwe<br/>Nyika yeZimbabwe<br/>Tiko ra Zimbabwe<br/>Naha ya Zimbabwe<br/>Cisi ca Zimbabwe<br/>Shango ḽa Zimbabwe<br/>Ilizwe lase-Zimbabwe
|image_flag=Flag of Zimbabwe.svg.png|image_coat=Coat of arms of Zimbabwe.svg.png|capital=[[Harare]]|largest_city=Harare|mode_of_production=Capitalism|government_type=Unitary presidential republic|leader_title1=President|leader_name1=[[Emmerson Mnangagwa]]|leader_title2=Vice-President|leader_name2=[[Constantino Chiwenga]]|national_motto=Unity, Freedom, Work|image_map=Zimbabwe (orthographic projection).svg|map_width=260|official_languages=[[Chewa language|Chewa]], [[Chibarwe]], [[English]] (used in education, government, and commerce), [[Kalanga language|Kalanga]], [[Khoisan languages|Khoisan]], [[Nambya language|Nambya]], [[Ndau language|Ndau]], [[Northern Ndebele language|Ndebele]], [[Shangani language|Shangani]], [[Shona language|Shona]], [[Zimbabwean sign language]], [[Sotho language|Sotho]], [[Tonga language (Zambia and Zimbabwe)|Tonga]], [[Tswana language|Tswana]], [[Venda language|Venda]], and [[Xhosa language|Xhosa]]|demonym=Zimbabwean|established_event1=[[Unilateral Declaration of Independence (Rhodesia)|Declaration of Independence]]|established_date1=11 November 1965|established_event2=[[Republic of Rhodesia]]|established_date2=2 March 1970|established_event3=[[Zimbabwe Rhodesia]]|established_date3=1 June 1979|established_event4=[[House Lancaster Agreement]]|established_date4=18 April 1980|established_event5=[[2013 Constitution of Zimbabwe|Current constitution]]|established_date5=15 May 2013|area_km2=390,757|area_rank=60th|population_estimate=15,178,979<ref>https://zimbabwe.opendataforafrica.org/anjlptc/2022-population-housing-census-preliminary</ref>|population_estimate_year=2022|currency=[[Zimbabwean dollar (2019–present)|Zimbabwean dollar]]<br/>[[United States dollar]]}}

'''Zimbabwe''', officially the '''Republic of Zimbabwe''', is a landlocked country located in Southeast [[Africa]]. It is bordered by [[Republic of South Africa|South Africa]] to the south, [[Botswana]] to the south-west, [[Zambia]] to the north, and [[Mozambique]] to the east. 

The capital and largest city is [[Harare]]. Zimbabwe has been subjected to intense [[Economic sanctions|sanctions]] from [[Imperialism|imperialist]] powers, mainly in response to land reform policies that expropriated land from white [[Settler colonialism|settlers]].<ref name=":0">Covington, Arthur. [https://www.liberationnews.org/05-06-01-zimbabwes-people-reject-imperia-html/ “Zimbabwe’s People Reject Imperialist Intervention.”] Liberation News. June 2005. [https://web.archive.org/web/20221115033441/https://www.liberationnews.org/05-06-01-zimbabwes-people-reject-imperia-html/ Archived] 2022-11-15.</ref> 

The area that is now modern Zimbabwe was known during the [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland|British]] [[Colonialism|colonial]] period as [[Southern Rhodesia]], named for imperialist [[Bourgeoisie|businessman]] [[Cecil Rhodes]], who made his fortune in consolidating diamond mines. In 1965, the colony renamed itself [[Rhodesia]] and broke from the United Kingdom with the express purpose of maintaining white rule.<ref>''The New York Times''. [https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/magazine/rhodesia-zimbabwe-white-supremacists.html “Rhodesia’s Dead — but White Supremacists Have given It New Life Online (Published 2018)”] [https://web.archive.org/web/20221110160109/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/magazine/rhodesia-zimbabwe-white-supremacists.html Archived] 2022-11-10.</ref> 

An article in [[Liberation News|''Liberation News'']] describes the western imperialist hostility toward Zimbabwe, saying: "hostility stems first and foremost from the fact that Zimbabwe's government has its origin in the armed struggle that ended the Western-backed [[Racism|racist]], [[Fascism|fascist]] settler regime. [[United States of America|U.S.]] and British opposition to the government reached a crescendo as the [[Robert Mugabe|Mugabe]] government moved to confiscate and redistribute the commercial agricultural land owned by white farmers. This land constituted 70 percent of the country’s prime farmlands."<ref name=":0" />

== History ==

=== Early history ===
The country which is now known as Zimbabwe has been inhabited by many different peoples and kingdoms with complex relationships throughout history and was not a single geographical entity before its colonial occupation by the British.<ref name=":1">[https://www.sahistory.org.za/place/zimbabwe "Zimbabwe."] [[South African History Online]]. [https://web.archive.org/web/20240225185001/https://www.sahistory.org.za/place/zimbabwe Archived] 2023-02-25.</ref> As noted in an article on the Government of Zimbabwe website, "the political, social, and economic, relations of these groups were complex, dynamic, fluid and always changing. They were characterised by both conflict and co-operation." The region's history includes the rise and fall of several large and influential states as well as people living in smaller forms of social organization.<ref name=":2">[https://www.zim.gov.zw/index.php/en/my-government/government-ministries/about-zimbabwe/460-history-of-zimbabwe?showall=1 "History of Zimbabwe."] About Zimbabwe, Official Government of Zimbabwe Web Portal.  [https://web.archive.org/web/20240412191116/https://www.zim.gov.zw/index.php/en/my-government/government-ministries/about-zimbabwe/460-history-of-zimbabwe?showall=1 Archived] 2024-04-12.</ref>

The city of Great Zimbabwe existed from 1100 to 1500 CE and had a population of 20,000. It controlled over 100,000 km² of territory between the Zambezi and Limpopo rivers, and its economy relied on cattle, [[Agriculture|farming]], and trade of ivory, copper, gold, and [[Slavery|slaves]].<ref name=":02222">{{Citation|author=Neil Faulkner|year=2013|title=A Marxist History of the World: From Neanderthals to Neoliberals|chapter=The First Class Societies|page=19|pdf=https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzacedljwr5izotdclz23o3c5p4di4t3ero3ncbfytip55slhiz4otuls?filename=Neil%20Faulkner%20-%20A%20Marxist%20History%20of%20the%20World_%20From%20Neanderthals%20to%20Neoliberals-Pluto%20Press%20%282013%29.pdf|publisher=Pluto Press|isbn=9781849648639|lg=https://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=91CA6C708BFE15444FE27899217FBA8E}}</ref> Great Zimbabwe is also noted for its long-distance and regional trade, including trade with [[History of China|China]], [[Republic of India|India]], [[West Asia]], [[East Africa|East]] and [[West Africa]], among other regional and inter-regional areas. Other notable states which emerged in pre-colonial Zimbabwe include the Mutapa State, the Rozvi State, the Torwa state, Rozvi states and the Ndebele state. An article on the Government of Zimbabwe's website notes that while these large and influential pre-colonial states of Zimbabwe are a source of pride, the majority of Zimbabweans lived in smaller units, with pre-colonial Zimbabwe societies mainly being farming communities and pastoralists. The article also notes that cattle were an important indicator of wealth and that gold mining was a seasonal activity conducted mainly in summer and winter.<ref name=":2" />

As explained on the Government of Zimbabwe's website, pre-colonial Zimbabwe was a multi-ethnic society inhabited by the Shangni/Tsonga in the south-eastern parts of the Zimbabwe plateau, the Venda in the south, the Tonga in the north, the Kalanga and Ndebele in the south-west, the Karanga in the southern parts of the plateau, the Zezuru and Korekore in the northern and central parts, and finally, the Manyika and Ndau in the east. The article notes that scholars have tended to lump these groups into two broad categories, the Ndebele and Shona, "largely because of their broadly similar languages, beliefs and institutions" and describes the term "Shona" as an anachronism that did not exist until the 19th century and which "conflates linguistic, cultural and political attributes of ethnically related people."<ref name=":2" />

=== Colonialism ===

==== Portuguese colonialism ====
During the 1500s, the [[Portuguese Republic|Portuguese]] reached the Mutapa state and attempted to convert the royal family to [[Christianity]]. Though initially achieving some success, eventually the King renounced Christianity. The killing of a Portuguese missionary prompted punitive expeditions by the Portuguese, and they began interfering more in the region, demanding treaties of vassalage from a rival claimant of the Mutapa kingship and using slaves to work the land they acquired in these treaties (on estates known as [[Prazo|prazos]]), resulting in many armed conflicts in the region. Eventually, the Portuguese were successfully driven out throughout the 1680s and 1690s, with Portuguese mercantilism no longer gaining a serious foothold in Zimbabwe.<ref name=":2" />

==== Europe's "Scramble for Africa" ====
After the expulsion of the Portuguese, internal regional affairs of Zimbabwe continued to unfold, while other effects of the European colonization of Africa led to changes throughout the continent, with the area that corresponds to present-day Zimbabwe becoming one of many points of geostrategic interest for the competing powers.
Over time, the Rozvi state encountered various difficulties, and eventually, came into conflict with Ndebele in the 1850s, resulting in the Ndebele state coming to prominence. According to South Africa History Online, by 1873 "the Ndebele was a consolidated state and at the height of their power."<ref name=":1" /> The Government of Zimbabwe website describes this period in the following way, highlighting the interplay of the kingdom's own regional affairs as well as the increasing threat of instability posed by outside influences:<blockquote>The Ndebele had to establish a strong military presence to establish their authority in their newly acquired land. Besides subduing the original Shona rulers, they had to content with the [[Boers]] from the [[Transvaal]] who in 1847 crossed the Limpopo and destroyed some Ndebele villages in the periphery of Ndebele country. Then there were the numerous hunters and adventurers who also entered the country to the south. Over and above these were the missionaries and traders; all these groups threatened the internal security and stability of the kingdom.<ref name=":2" /></blockquote>By the late 1800s, the European colonizers were increasing their efforts to conquer Africa, and the "scramble for Africa" was formalized with the [[Berlin Conference|Berlin Conference of 1884-1885]], with the formal partitioning of Africa to exploit its people and resources for colonial interests. The British thus began their incursions into the region later known as Zimbabwe in the 1880s.<ref name=":1" />

Among the European powers colonizing Africa, there were various competing designs for how to link up their own occupied areas into vast unbroken territories. British colonialist Cecil Rhodes, then active in business and politics in South Africa, was a proponent of expanding the British empire and of linking up British-occupied territory, a concept encapsulated in the vision of a "Cape to Cairo" railway. This vision would conflict with ideas such as Germany's aims of consolidating "Mittelafrika" which would span from the Atlantic to Indian Ocean, which, if realized, would block the north-south connection of Rhodes' plan. Given the geopolitical outlook of the time, Rhodes reasoned that the most viable path to his vision would be to seize the areas of Mashonaland and Matabeleland, then ruled by King [[Lobengula]], an area which corresponds roughly to present-day Zimbabwe. In addition, Rhodes was drawn to this region by rumors of sources of gold.<ref name=":3">Drohan, Madelaine. [https://archive.org/details/makingkillinghow0000droh/page/7/mode/1up "Making a Killing: How and Why Corporations Use Armed Force to do Business."] Ch. 1, Cecil Rhodes and the British South Africa Company. Random House Canada, 2003.</ref>

The Government of Zimbabwe website describes the role of missionaries in the colonization process as well:<blockquote>[M]issionaries were the earliest representatives of the imperial world that eventually violently conquered the Shona and the Ndebele. They aimed as reconstructing the African world in name of God and Europe civilisation, but in the process facilitating the colonisation of Zimbabwe. [...] Missionaries were consistent and persistent in denigrating and castigating African cultural and religions beliefs/practices as pagan, demonic and evil.<ref name=":2" /></blockquote>The article further notes that it was missionaries (such as Rev. Charles Helm)<ref name=":3" /> who assisted Cecil Rhodes and his accomplice Charles Rudd in misrepresenting the contents of a document to King Lobengula, known as the [[Rudd Concession]], inducing him to sign it under false pretenses, and thereby unintentionally ceding land and mineral rights to Rhodes. The article states that some positives did come from the missionaries, along with the abuses, and that in light of these ambiguities, the "African response to Christianity remained ambivalent."<ref name=":2" />

==== Rudd Concession ====
A so-called concession, known as the Rudd Concession, which Cecil Rhodes' delegation misrepresented to King Lobengula as they induced him to sign it, granted the company "the complete and exclusive charge over all metals and minerals" in the region, as well as "full power to do all things that they may deem necessary to win and procure the same," which the company used as permission to seize land and obtain a royal charter (which was granted in 1889).<ref name=":4">Elich, Gregory. [https://gregoryelich.org/2002/08/26/zimbabwe-under-siege/ "Zimbabwe Under Siege."] August 26, 2002, GregoryElich.org. [https://web.archive.org/web/20240413060433/https://gregoryelich.org/2002/08/26/zimbabwe-under-siege/ Archived] 2024-04-13.</ref><ref>[https://www.sahistory.org.za/archive/rudd-concession-king-lobengula-matabeleland-1888 "Rudd Concession by King Lobengula of Matabeleland (1888)."] South African History Online. [https://web.archive.org/web/20240203180352/https://www.sahistory.org.za/archive/rudd-concession-king-lobengula-matabeleland-1888 Archived] 2024-02-03.</ref>

Following this, Lobengula learned what the actual contents of the document had been, and sent a letter to Queen Victoria explaining the deliberate deception and that he would not recognize the document as valid. An official response advised Lobengula that it would be "impossible" for him to exclude white men looking for gold in his land, along with giving advice on how to manage their presence there to give the "least trouble to himself and his tribe", and expressed the Queen's approval of Lobengula's so-called concession.<ref name=":4" /><ref>[https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1893/nov/09/motion-for-adjournment "MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT."] HC Deb 09, November 1893, vol 18 cc543-627. UK Parliament. [https://web.archive.org/web/20220811190200/https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1893/nov/09/motion-for-adjournment Archived] 2022-08-11.</ref>

==== Settlers seize the land ====
[[File:Southern Rhodesia Settler Handbook.png|alt=Cover of a handbook for prospective settlers to Southern Rhodesia, featuring a portrait of Cecil Rhodes.|thumb|378x378px|A handbook for "prospective settlers," one of various promotional materials meant to attract settlers to Zimbabwe. Cecil Rhodes' portrait is featured on the cover.]]
The British South African Company (BSAC) sought to produce a profit for its founder, Cecil Rhodes, and its other investors, in addition to expanding the British empire. Thus they sought to colonize the region, which they called "Southern Rhodesia", and which they believed to be rich in gold and other valuable minerals. However, the company itself was not interested in prospecting and mining the minerals themselves, but rather sought to profit through taxation, by enticing European [[Settler colonialism|settlers]] to move to Southern Rhodesia to do the prospecting and mining, with BSAC receiving royalties on all mined minerals:<blockquote>To attract European settlers the BSAC publicized reports of the potential mineral wealth of Zimbabwe and promised each settler 15 mining claims and large tracks of land (3,175 acres per settler) on which to prospect for minerals. Minerals found and mined by the settlers would belong to them, but they would have to have to pay royalties (taxes) to the Company on all mined minerals.<ref name=":5">[https://exploringafrica.matrix.msu.edu/module-thirty-activity-three/ "The Land Question."] Module Thirty, Activity Three. Exploring Africa, Michigan State University African Studies Center. [https://web.archive.org/web/20240413182804/https://exploringafrica.matrix.msu.edu/module-thirty-activity-three/ Archived] 2024-04-13.</ref></blockquote>In addition, BSAC assembled the "Pioneer Column" to occupy the region and establish [[company rule]], again recruiting these settlers with land offers. As the Government of Zimbabwe website summarizes:<blockquote>In 1890, Rhodes unleashed the Pioneer Column to invade Mashonaland, marking the beginning of white settler occupation of Zimbabwe. The Shona were not quick to respond to the invasion as they wrongly assumed the column was merely a uniquely large trade and gold-seeking party that would soon vacate. Soon Rhodes’ invading British South Africa Company (BSAC) established a Native Department that authorised labour and tax raids on the Shona. Henceforth, constant skirmishes between Shona communities and tax collectors and labour raiders ensued as the Shona, who had not been conquered at all, saw no premise upon which the company could demand tax and labour from them. More significantly, however, the company started appropriating and granting land to the settler pioneers.<ref name=":2" /></blockquote>After the formation of Southern Rhodesia, the settlers failed to find the large gold and mineral deposits they had expected to profit from. Both BSAC and the settlers were desperate to find alternative sources of income and wealth, and looked to agricultural production as their alternative, leading them to pursue further territorial expansion.<ref name=":5" />

Seeking dominance over the land, in October 1893, British troops and volunteers crossed into King Lobengula's territory of Matabeleland. As noted by author Gregory Elich, "the entire region rapidly fell into their hands as they inflicted heavy casualties on the Ndebele. Under terms of the resulting Victoria Agreement, each volunteer was entitled to 6,000 acres of land. Rather than an organized division of land, there was instead a mad race to grab the best land," with 10,000 square miles of the most fertile land being seized from its inhabitants within the first year. White settlers also confiscated most of the Ndebele's cattle, Elich notes, "a devastating loss to a cattle-ranching society such as the Ndebele."<ref name=":4" />

The settlers, who were relatively few in number yet had seized large tracts of land in their violent acts of [[Primitive accumulation of capital|primitive accumulation]], now required people to work the land, and thus "the Ndebele became forced laborers on the land they once owned, essentially treated as slaves."<ref name=":4" /> The Shona were also robbed of their cattle, as well as subjected to onerous taxes and forced labor, and local women were faced with sexual violence.<ref name=":2" />

The Government of Zimbabwe website explains that despite spirited resistance at the Battles of Mbembezi River, Shangani River and at Pupu across the Shangani River, the Ndebele were defeated in October 1893, leading Lobengula to set fire to his capital and flee to the north, never to be seen again, dead or alive. However, some Ndebele forces remained and would later rise up again against the colonizers. Likewise, the Shona would also rise up in the face of the colonizing forces. These uprisings, which occurred in 1896, are termed the [[First Chimurenga]], and formed the basis of later mass nationalism and inspiration during the [[Second Chimurenga]] in the mid-1960s.<ref name=":2" />

==== Early colonial rule ====
In 1894, the first of seven Land Commissions was established by the colonial regime. The colonizers soon established two reserves (in the arid locations of Gwai and Shangani) to which the Ndebele would be expelled, so as to protect the settlers while they stole the Ndebele's land, and to free up more attractive lands for the settlers while forcing the indigenous inhabitants into less desirable locations. In the following years, more "Native Reserves" (later called "Tribal Trust Lands") were created to expel Ndebele and Shona people to as the settler project proceeded with taking over the more fertile lands.<ref name=":5" />

As noted by the Government of Zimbabwe's history article, an early challenge for the colonial regime "was how to rule the Shona and Ndebele in an exploitative way, but without provoking another uprising." The article notes that land dispossession and forced [[proletarianization]] helped to secure the key aim of "maximum output premised on minimum cost", and was achieved through "restricting African access to land, thus undercutting African [[Peasantry|peasant]] agricultural production, increasing taxation and hence forcing Africans to sell their labour cheaply to white mine owners and farmers."<ref name=":2" /> Historian Alois S. Mlambo explains that in the early years, the settlers and colonial economy depended almost entirely on African labor and that the shortage of African labor was a "perennial problem" for the regime, resulting in part from the indigenous population's reluctance to work for a wage when they could meet most of their needs through independent agriculture and the sale of their produce to the settler population. Due to this state of affairs, white farmers and miners to continually demanded that the state pass measures to force Africans into the labor market.<ref name=":7" />



South Africa History Online describes the process and methods in the following way:<blockquote>Land was taken away from Africans and heavy taxes imposed as a way of forcing them into wage labour. As small scale farmers the African people in Rhodesia were self sufficient and had no need for seeking wage labour in the white cities. Yet the settlers needed cheap labour to work in mines, farms and factories around the colony. By taking away land and imposing what is called a “[[Hut tax|hut-tax]]” local people were forced to get jobs in the colonial economy. There were also put into place laws which forced Shona and Ndebele people to sign long-term contracts which forced them to stay in labour compounds. The result of these laws were that black people become slave labour in the white economy.<ref name=":1" /></blockquote>The early period of the colonial regime was still focused largely on mining, though over time, the focus began to shift to agriculture as it became more apparent that the rumored massive gold reserves BSAC expected were not to be found. In this period, the settlers' mines and emerging towns obtained agricultural products primarily from indigenous peasant farmers, with settlers engaging in relatively minor agricultural activity themselves. As the settlers' agricultural sector gradually grew (as they were expelling the indigenous population to arid reserves, stealing their land, and otherwise restricting native people from land access), competition from African farmers still left white farming ventures in a precarious position. By 1908, a "white agriculture policy" was put forth by the colonial regime to boost the viability of white farmers who had previously been dependent on indigenous farmers:<blockquote>Until white agriculture became established, however, the expansion of peasant production was allowed, as the settler community depended on it. This was soon to change as white commercial agriculture developed as a result of a vigorous state policy and a concerted campaign to promote white agriculture which was based on a multi-pronged white agriculture policy. This began with the creation of an Estates Department in 1908 to promote European settlement and to handle all applications for land.<ref name=":7">Mlambo, Alois S. [https://archive.org/details/historyofzimbabw0000mlam "A History of Zimbabwe."] Cambridge University Press, 2014.</ref></blockquote>The government campaign to promote white agriculture included free agricultural training for white farmers; the establishment of a Land Bank to provide white farmers with loans for the purchase of farms, livestock, and equipment and for farm improvements such as irrigation and fencing; other inputs were offered at subsidized prices; and infrastructural projects were undertaken to improve the roads and irrigation near white settlements.<ref name=":7" />

While white settlers were being aided by these policies, indigenous Zimbabweans continued to have their land stolen and be expelled to arid reserves, and indigenous farmers thus came under increasing pressure. By the 1930s, Africans were not allowed to own land outside the reserves, and most reserves were severely over-crowded with few employment opportunities for landless Zimbabweans.<ref name=":4" /> Alois S. Mlambo notes that the reserves to which Africans were sent were not only poor agricultural land, but also far away from major transportation lines and market towns, further contributing to eliminating African competition in the market.<ref name=":7" /> As the Government of Zimbabwe's website summarizes, "White commercial production was promoted on the back of the destruction of African peasant production. This wanton undercutting of African peasant production marked the beginning of the underdevelopment of African reserves in Rhodesia and the forcible proletarianisation of the African."<ref name=":2" />

The article goes on to describe the various responses by indigenous Zimbabweans to the settler regime, which ranged from outright resistance, to acquiescence, to adopting and adapting Christian ideologies, and to the use of petitions for the return of Ndebele land alienated by the settlers. By 1923, there was the Southern Rhodesia Bantu Voters Association, which though "largely an elitist organisation" is noted for its "vibrant Women’s league". Also significant was "the formation of African churches that broke away from the orthodox Christian churches to ameliorate the impact of colonialism" and the [[Industrial and Commercial Workers' Union]] (ICU)<ref name=":2" /> which was active in several countries in Southern Africa.<ref>[https://thetricontinental.org/a-brief-history-of-south-africas-industrial-and-commercial-workers-union-1919-1931/ "A Brief History of South Africa’s Industrial and Commercial Workers’ Union (1919-1931)."] Dossier #20, The Tricontinental. September 3, 2019. ([https://thetricontinental.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/190902_Dossier-20_EN_Web_Final.pdf PDF]). [https://web.archive.org/web/20240421075811/https://thetricontinental.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/190902_Dossier-20_EN_Web_Final.pdf Archived] 2024-04-21.</ref> [[Clements Kadalie]], founder of the ICU, described how working and witnessing conditions in Southern Rhodesia had influenced him: "I had worked as a clerk in two leading mines in Southern Rhodesia, where I watched the evils of the recruiting system [...] it was the systematic torture of the African people in Southern Rhodesia that kindled the spirit of revolt in me."<ref>Kadalie, Clements. [https://archive.org/details/mylifeicuautobio0000kada/ "My life and the ICU: The Autobiography of a Black Trade Unionist in South Africa."] Frank Cass & Co., Ltd., 1970.</ref>

==Sanctions==
<blockquote>''See also: [[Economic sanctions#Zimbabwe]]''</blockquote>[[File:Members of the Broad Alliance Against Sanctions in Zimbabwe.jpg|thumb|Members of the Broad Alliance Against Sanctions hold anti-sanctions placards in front of the U.S. embassy in Harare, Zimbabwe, on July 4, 2022.]]According to Chidiebere C. Ogbonna in the African Research Review, from 1966 until the present, "Zimbabwe at one time or another has been under sanctions either by the United Nations the United States, the European Union or all the aforementioned. In total, Zimbabwe has been sanctioned in seven sanction-episodes: 1966, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2008 and 2009, making it one of the most sanctioned countries in the world." Ogbonna states that in a simple analysis, Zimbabwe has become a regular candidate of the "sanctions industry."<ref>Chidiebere C Ogbonna [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319870565_Targeted_or_Restrictive_Impact_of_US_and_EU_Sanctions_on_Education_and_Healthcare_of_Zimbabweans "Targeted or Restrictive: Impact of U.S. and EU Sanctions on Education and Healthcare of Zimbabweans."] September 2017, African Research Review 11(3):31 DOI:10.4314/afrrev.v11i3.4</ref>

According to a 2022 article by [[Xinhua|Xinhua News]], the U.S. sanctions against Zimbabwe have accumulated since 2001, following a government decision to repossess land from minority white farmers for redistribution to landless indigenous Zimbabweans. The Xinhua article notes that though the Zimbabwean government said the land reform would promote democracy and the economy, "Western countries launched repeated sanctions with little regard for the average person's suffering." Linda Masarira, president of the Labour Economists and Afrikan Democrats (LEAD) political party, said sanctions have been used as a tool of economic warfare against Zimbabwe, and that sanctioning Zimbabwe "was an action that the United States of America decided to do on Zimbabwe to ensure that they make our economy scream, they make things hard for Zimbabweans and imply that black Zimbabweans, native Zimbabweans cannot do their own farming, or run their own economy."<ref>Tichaona Chifamba, Zhang Yuliang, Cao Kai. [https://english.news.cn/20220711/5ed659ab8a7e40c5a2baa116589bcede/c.html "Two-decade-old U.S. sanctions leave Zimbabweans suffering, triggering protests".] Xinhua. 2022-07-11. [https://web.archive.org/web/20220909064843/https://english.news.cn/20220711/5ed659ab8a7e40c5a2baa116589bcede/c.html Archived] 2022-09-09.</ref>

== Economy ==
[[File:This land is our land, our only land!.png|alt=Demonstrator in Zimbabwe holds sign reading "This is our land, our only land!"|thumb|Demonstrator in Zimbabwe holds sign reading "This is our land, our only land!"]]
As a state which was afflicted with settler-colonialism and later successfully overcame the settler regime, while still having to contend with Western imperialism and [[Neoliberalism|neoliberal]] economic policies to this day, control over land and the economic distortions wrought by settler-colonialism have been key issues in Zimbabwe's economic development. Zimbabwe's present-day economic conditions must be considered in this context, with attention given both to Zimbabwe's local conditions as well as to Western imperialists' past and present efforts to hamper Zimbabwe's land redistribution process through methods such as unfavorable negotiations, dropped agreements, neoliberal [[International Monetary Fund|structural adjustment programs]], sanctions, and credit freezes.<ref>[[George T. Mudimu]] and Gregory Elich. [https://monthlyreview.org/2023/06/01/the-dynamics-of-rural-capitalist-accumulation-in-post-land-reform-zimbabwe/ "The Dynamics of Rural Capitalist Accumulation in Post-Land Reform Zimbabwe."] MR Online, June 1, 2023. [https://web.archive.org/web/20240413045326/https://monthlyreview.org/2023/06/01/the-dynamics-of-rural-capitalist-accumulation-in-post-land-reform-zimbabwe/ Archived] 2023-04-13.</ref>

=== Mining ===
Zimbabwe has the largest [[lithium]] supply in Africa. In December 2022, the government banned raw lithium exports in order to process it into batteries in Zimbabwe.<ref>{{Web citation|author=Christopher Ojilere|newspaper=Voice of Nigeria|title=Zimbabwe Bans All Lithium Exports|date=2022-12-29|url=https://von.gov.ng/zimbabwe-bans-all-lithium-exports/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221230072518/https://von.gov.ng/zimbabwe-bans-all-lithium-exports/|archive-date=2022-12-30|retrieved=2023-01-02}}</ref>

=== Agriculture ===
In regard to the common insinuation made by Western critics that indigenous Zimbabweans are incompetent farmers compared to the white settler commercial farm owners, land policy analyst Sam Moyo explained in a 2009 article that Zimbabwe's peasants and urban residents' gardens have always produced the majority of food consumed by the majority of Zimbabweans, while large white producers primarily produced for export, generally making products which the majority of the local population could not afford:<blockquote>[C]lose to 70% of the food consumed by the 80% of Zimbabweans who are the working classes (peasants, formal and informal wage workers, the unemployed) and over 50% of the middle class foods, which comprise mainly grains (maize, sorghum, groundnuts and pulses as oils or for direct eating) and local relish (greens) have always been produced by the peasants and urban residents’ gardens. [...] by far the largest outputs (in volumes and value) produced by large farmers were destined for exports (tobacco, sugar, tea, coffee, horticulture, beef, etc.) and for the local industry (soaps, etc.).  Although their exports were critical for forex (40% of national forex was from agriculture, but peasants produced 80% of the cotton and its attendant forex), they were not the main supplier of the food consumed by most of the population, who could not afford their products.<ref name=":6">Gregory Elich and [[Sam Moyo]]. [https://mronline.org/2009/01/02/reclaiming-the-land-land-reform-and-agricultural-development-in-zimbabwe-an-interview-with-sam-moyo/ "Reclaiming the Land: Land Reform and Agricultural Development in Zimbabwe: An Interview with Sam Moyo."] MR Online, January 02, 2009. [https://web.archive.org/web/20240413051815/https://mronline.org/2009/01/02/reclaiming-the-land-land-reform-and-agricultural-development-in-zimbabwe-an-interview-with-sam-moyo/ Archived] 2023-04-13.</ref></blockquote>Moyo states that there was a clear division of production between peasants and large farmers, with the peasants producing most of the cheaper and bulkier foods, and large farmers producing foods generally consumed by fewer people.

Addressing issues in the production of bulk foods such as [[maize]], Moyo attributed it mainly to a decline in seed and fertilizer supply and reduced private and external financing. Extremely low input supplies (resulting from Western sanctions), combined with climate effects such as droughts and rain variability, reduced rain-fed maize production by the peasantry, as 90% of the irrigation resources were held by large farmers, including the [[sugar]] estates.<ref name=":6" />

==References==
<references />

[[Category:Countries]] [[Category:African countries]]
[[Category:Countries targeted by imperialist aggression]]
[[Category:Countries sanctioned by the US]]