Editing Wikipedia

[[File:Wikipedia logo.png|226x226px|Wikipedia - ''the free encyclopedia''|right|frameless]]
'''Wikipedia''' is an [[Bourgeois media|imperialist propaganda outlet]] and [[Misinformation|disinformation]] website presenting itself as an "encyclopedia" launched in 2001 by [[bourgeois]] [[Libertarianism|libertarians]] [[Jimmy Wales]] and [[Larry Sanger]]. Wikipedia is maintained by a predominantly white male population, of which about 1% are responsible for 80% of edits. It has also been linked to corporate and governmental manipulation and [[Imperialism|imperialist]] agendas, including the [[United States Department of State|U.S. State Department]], [[The World Bank|World Bank]],<ref name=":5">{{Web citation|author=[[Ben Norton]], [[Max Blumenthal]]|newspaper=[[The Grayzone]]|title=Meet Wikipedia’s Ayn Rand-loving founder and Wikimedia Foundation’s regime-change operative CEO|date=2020-06-11|url=https://thegrayzone.com/2020/06/11/meet-wikipedias-ayn-rand-loving-founder-and-wikimedia-foundations-regime-change-operative-ceo/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220816135825/https://thegrayzone.com/2020/06/11/meet-wikipedias-ayn-rand-loving-founder-and-wikimedia-foundations-regime-change-operative-ceo/|archive-date=2022-08-16|retrieved=2022-09-10}}</ref> [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]], [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]], and New York Police Department.<ref>{{Web citation|author=Stansfield Smith|newspaper=[[Multipolarista]]|title=US national security state censoring anti-imperialists to control ‘compatible left’|date=2022-07-02|url=https://multipolarista.com/2022/07/02/censorship-anti-imperialists-compatible-left/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220830195608/https://multipolarista.com/2022/07/02/censorship-anti-imperialists-compatible-left/|archive-date=2022-08-30|retrieved=2022-09-10}}</ref> 

Its popularity means that it is a prime target for misinformation campaigns by state actors or corporate interests. This was, in part, the reasoning behind starting [[ProleWiki]]. 

Wikipedia uses the same software that ProleWiki and [[EcuRed]] use, called [[MediaWiki]]. 

== History ==
[[File:2005 October 28 Jimbo Wales edits Jimmy Wales article to remove Larry Sanger from history of Wikipedia section.jpg|thumb|Picture of the edit made by Jimmy Wales (user Jimbo Wales) removing mentions of Larry Sanger from Wikipedia.]]
Wiki websites were created in 1995 by Ward Cunningham, who started WikiWikiWeb<ref>[https://wiki.c2.com/ WikiWikiWeb] website</ref> as a collaborative repository for developers. In 2001, hedge fund manager Jimmy Wales had the idea of creating his own online encyclopedia. He hired programmer Larry Sanger for the task, who was inspired by WikiWikiWeb for the functioning of this new encyclopedia. In 2005, Wales edited Wikipedia's own pages to delete Sanger's contributions and cofounder status (despite being instrumental in the founding) as he was only an employee according to Wales.

== Concept ==
Wikipedia claims its main purpose is to:<blockquote>"benefit readers by acting as a '''widely accessible and free encyclopedia'''; a comprehensive written compendium that contains information on all branches of knowledge."<ref name=":3">{{News citation|newspaper=Wikipedia|title=Wikipedia:Purpose|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Purpose|retrieved=2022-7-16}}</ref></blockquote>Wikipedia further claims that:<blockquote>"The goal of a Wikipedia article is to present a neutrally written summary of existing mainstream knowledge in a fair and accurate manner with a straightforward, "just-the-facts style". Articles should have an encyclopedic style with a formal tone instead of essay-like, argumentative, promotional or opinionated writing."<ref name=":3" /></blockquote>It also claims that:<blockquote>"Wikipedia's content is governed by three principal core content policies - neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research."<ref name=":3" /></blockquote>In practice, these principles push Wikipedia editorship towards being [[Liberalism|liberal]] (pro-capitalism and pro-[[imperialism]]) and using [[bourgeois media]] as infallible sources. With time (over 20 years of Wikipedia existing), this created a self-reproducing culture of liberalism within Wikipedia which is heavily punished if one deviates from it.

Additionally, Wikipedia doesn't prevent lobbyists from paying people to edit pages.<ref name=":4">{{News citation|newspaper=Wikipedia|title=Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure|retrieved=2022-6-28}}</ref>

== Criticism ==
[[File:Wikipedia-biased-sources.png|alt=Screenshot of wikipedia sources many of which are anti-communist|thumb|Western [[Anti-communism|anti-communist]] sources are prevalently used on English Wikipedia. ]]

=== Administration and users ===

==== Founder Jimmy Wales ====
Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy Wales, is a self-described [[Ayn Rand]] [[Libertarianism|libertarian]] and [[Anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalist]]<ref name=":5" /> who also wilfully participates in imperialist operations at the request of the US government. In a 2007 US Senate Committee, Wales stated:
:I am grateful to be here today to testify about the potential for the Wikipedia model of collaboration and information sharing which may be helpful to government operations and homeland security.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Wikisource|title=2007 Testimony by Jimmy Wales to United States Senate|url=https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=2007_Testimony_by_Jimmy_Wales_to_United_States_Senate&oldid=12776340}}</ref>
In addition to [[United States imperialism|U.S. imperialism]], Wales supported [[State of Israel|Israel]]'s bombing of [[Gaza Strip|Gaza]] in 2018.<ref name=":5" />

While the website is technically managed by the Wikimedia foundation, it was created by Wales himself who remains on the board of trustees<ref>[https://wikimediafoundation.org/profile/jimmy-wales/ Jimmy Wales profile]. Wikimedia Foundation.</ref> and is still seen as a "benevolent dictator, constitutional monarch, digital evangelist and spiritual leader".<ref>Noam Cohen. “[https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/17/technology/17wikipedia.html Open-Source Troubles in Wiki World]”. ''New York Times'', 17 March 2008.</ref>

====CEO Katherine Maher====
Katherine Maher, the former CEO of the foundation, previously worked for the [[The World Bank|World Bank]], specifically in the African and Middle-East divisions.<ref>[https://wikimediafoundation.org/profile/katherine-maher/ Katherine Maher profile]. Wikimedia Foundation.</ref> She also worked at the [[National Democratic Institute]] (an [[National Endowment for Democracy|NED]] front group)<ref name=":0">{{Web citation|newspaper=Qiuwen Baike|title=What is an "objective view based on Chinese values"? A brief discussion on the hypocrisy of Wikipedia's "neutrality"|url=https://www.qiuwenbaike.cn/wiki/Qiuwen:%E4%BD%95%E8%B0%93%E2%80%9C%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%E8%A7%82%E5%9F%BA%E7%A1%80%E4%B8%8A%E7%9A%84%E5%AE%A2%E8%A7%82%E8%A7%82%E7%82%B9%E2%80%9D%EF%BC%9F%E7%AE%80%E8%B0%88%E7%BB%B4%E5%9F%BA%E5%BC%8F%E2%80%9C%E4%B8%AD%E7%AB%8B%E2%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E8%99%9A%E4%BC%AA|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240426120219/https://www.qiuwenbaike.cn/wiki/Qiuwen:%E4%BD%95%E8%B0%93%E2%80%9C%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%E8%A7%82%E5%9F%BA%E7%A1%80%E4%B8%8A%E7%9A%84%E5%AE%A2%E8%A7%82%E8%A7%82%E7%82%B9%E2%80%9D%EF%BC%9F%E7%AE%80%E8%B0%88%E7%BB%B4%E5%9F%BA%E5%BC%8F%E2%80%9C%E4%B8%AD%E7%AB%8B%E2%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E8%99%9A%E4%BC%AA|archive-date=2024-04-26}}</ref> and is a fellow at the Truman National Security Project. In a June 2020 article from ''[[The Grayzone]]'', authors [[Ben Norton]] and [[Max Blumenthal]] delved deeper into Maher's connections to regime-change operatives and unearthed her whole résumé which linked her to more imperialist organisations and institutes.<ref name=":5" /> In particular, Maher went to [[Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (1977–2011)|Libya]] in early 2011, right before the Arab Spring began.

In April 2017, she participated in a briefing for the U.S. State Department and appeared in a panel with the former director of the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] and NSA in 2018. She is now on the advisory board of the [[Open Technology Fund]], which was created by CIA propaganda outlet [[Radio Free Asia]].<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Open Technology Fund|title=OTF's History|url=https://www.opentech.fund/about/our-history/|quote=... the Open Technology Fund (OTF) was created in 2012 as a program of Radio Free Asia.}}</ref>

In 2021, Maher left Wikipedia to join the State Department. She is also the current CEO of [[National Public Radio|NPR]], a US state media outlet.<ref name=":0" />

====User demographics====
While Wikipedia boasts that anyone can contribute, in reality only 1% of accounts are responsible for 80% of all edits.<ref>Grace Lisa Scott. [https://www.inverse.com/article/38302-wikipedia-one-percent “Wikipedia Study Reveals a Surprising Stat About Who Edits It”]. ''Inverse,'' 9 August 2017.</ref> Famously, the most prolific editor on Wikipedia (Steven Pruitt), who has edited 1/3rd of all articles, currently works for the US department of border control with previous employment at the [[United States Transportation Security Administration|TSA]] and [[United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement|ICE]].<ref>http://archive.ph/ix7kx</ref>

Other accounts in this 1% figure are people such as [[Philip Cross]], who posts without fail every single day from 6AM to 10PM<ref>Craig Murray. [https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/05/the-philip-cross-affair/ “The Philip Cross Affair”], 18 May 2018.</ref> and has over 100,000 edits.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=[[MintPress News]]|title=Phillip Cross: The Mystery Wikipedia Editor Targeting Anti-War Sites|url=https://www.mintpressnews.com/phillip-cross-the-mystery-wikipedia-editor-targeting-anti-war-sites/250824/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220816135847/https://www.mintpressnews.com/phillip-cross-the-mystery-wikipedia-editor-targeting-anti-war-sites/250824/|archive-date=2022-08-16|retrieved=2022-09-10}}</ref> This user makes and pro-war, [[Zionism|Zionist]], and [[climate change]] denial edits,<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=[[Proletarian (newspaper)|Proletarian]]|title=How Wikipedia is used to prop up the imperialist lie machine|date=2018-08-20|url=https://thecommunists.org/2018/08/20/news/how-wikipedia-is-used-to-prop-up-imperialist-lie-machine/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220519031628/https://thecommunists.org/2018/08/20/news/how-wikipedia-is-used-to-prop-up-imperialist-lie-machine/|archive-date=2022-05-19|retrieved=2022-12-18}}</ref> which highly suggests that the account is a [[sockpuppet]] managed by a whole governmental team, likely the [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland|British]].<ref name=":2">Media Lens. [https://www.mintpressnews.com/phillip-cross-the-mystery-wikipedia-editor-targeting-anti-war-sites/250824/ “Phillip Cross: The Mystery Wikipedia Editor Targeting Anti-War Sites”]. ''Mint Press News,'' 17 October 2018.</ref>

====Administrators====
Administrators on the site are editors with user-management powers (such as banning people, or preventing articles from being edited). In 2020, it was discovered that the Scots language Wikipedia was almost solely edited and managed by a 19-year-old [[United States of America|US]] citizen who did not speak a word of Scots from the time he was 12. He also used his administrative powers to block others from correcting his vandalism.<ref>Libby Brooks, Alex Hern. [https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/aug/26/shock-an-aw-us-teenager-wrote-huge-slice-of-scots-wikipedia “Shock an aw: US teenager wrote huge slice of Scots Wikipedia”]. ''The Guardian,'' 26 August 2020.</ref>

He was responsible for defacing almost half of Scots Wikipedia, and it is interesting to see here how easily administrator privileges are given to random users by other administrators, suggesting a widespread problem in the hierarchy. There have been various examples in the past of administrators who used their privileges to prevent their articles from being edited (therefore presenting their biased opinion as fact), or even asking for payment to let an edit through.

Wikipedia is purposely kept difficult to edit (providing only a plain-text markup editor, resolving conflicts through talk pages that have been filling up since 2010, etc.) so that administrators, most of whom have been editing Wikipedia since it became famous in 2003, can keep problematic users out citing technicalities and preventing them from defending themselves.

Administrators are the supreme decision-making authority, making them very worthwhile friends to have. They are also not accountable to anyone and can freely pick new people to join their ranks. It is not rare for users going against the agenda set out by the administrators to simply be banned on frivolous grounds. Around 1,000 IP addresses are banned by Wikipedia administrators every day. There is little privacy and users may be traced and tracked by Wikipedia administrators.<ref>[http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/the-dark-side-of-wikipedia “The Dark Side of Wikipedia”]. ''Full Measure,'' 21 August 2016.</ref>

====Anonymous or non-prolific users====
New users who do not take time to learn of the obscure templates, navigate through the very strict (and sometimes absurd) editorial guidelines or do not socialize with other users will often see their edits reverted in mere minutes, no matter how accurate or labour-intensive their edits were.

The Wikimedia foundation will still claim that their encyclopedia is "community-created". This is mainly a convenient lie for Wales to make it seem like his libertarian principles can work on a large scale. This has prompted Ben Norton to call Wikipedia a scam<ref>{{Web citation|author=Ben Norton|newspaper=Twitter|title=It has been known for well over a decade (this report is from 2007) that Wikipedia is heavily edited by corporations and governments and PR flacks they hire to spread propaganda. Enough with this absurd techno-"libertarian" nonsense. It was always a scam|date=2020-02-12|url=https://twitter.com/BenjaminNorton/status/1227725961975803905}}</ref> (in the interest of Jimmy Wales's bourgeois, libertarian interests). In truth, much like [[libertarianism]] itself, it remains controlled by corporate elites and imperialist organisations.

=== Racism and genocide denial===

==== Distortion of Polish involvement in the Holocaust ====
In the last decade, a group of committed Wikipedia editors on the English instancce have been promoting a skewed version of the history of the [[Holocaust]]  that is touted by right-wing [[Republic of Poland|Polish]] [[Nationalism|nationalists]], whitewashes the role of Polish society in the Holocaust, and bolsters stereotypes about [[Judaism|Jews]]. Due to this group's work, Wikipedia's articles on the Holocaust in [[Republic of Poland (1918–1939)|Poland]] minimize Polish [[antisemitism]], exaggerate the Poles' role in saving Jews, insinuate that most Jews supported [[Communism]] and conspired with Communists to betray Poles (''Żydokomuna'' or [[Cultural Marxism|Judeo-Bolshevism]]), blame Jews for their own persecution, and inflate Jewish collaboration with the [[German Reich (1933–1945)|Nazis]].<ref>{{Web citation|author=Jan Grabowski, Shira Klein|newspaper=Taylor&Francis Online|title=Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust|date=2023-02-09|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25785648.2023.2168939|archive-url=https://archive.ph/OIY9Z}}</ref>

====Congolese genocide denial====
The article on the [[genocide]] that happened in the [[Congo Free State (1885–1909)|Congo Free State]]<ref name=":1">https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atrocities_in_the_Congo_Free_State&oldid=986289478<br>Quoting the article in question:<blockquote>''"The significant number of deaths under the Free State regime has led some scholars to relate the atrocities to later genocides, though understanding of the losses under the colonial administration's rule as the result of harsh economic exploitation rather than a policy of deliberate extermination has led others to dispute the comparison; '''there is an open debate as to whether the atrocities constitute genocide'''."''</blockquote>We have also a [https://prolewiki.org/images/6/61/Wikipedia_Congolese_genocide_denial.png full page print] if Wikipedia ever decides to take the article down. This cited quote was taken from the section ''Historiography and the term "genocide"''.</ref> (the [[Kingdom of Belgium|Belgian]] colony of the [[Democratic Republic of the Congo|Congo]]), is now called "Atrocities in the Congo Free State" following a dispute between [[White people|white]] and African users over the previous name of "Congolese Genocide." 

User Brigade Piron,<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brigade_Piron</ref> a white [[Kingdom of Belgium|Belgian]] nationalist editor, claims that the term genocide is contested and at this time the article contradicts itself: first making it seem like the Congolese Genocide was caused mainly by disease, later saying it was caused by "harsh economic [[exploitation]], rather than a policy of deliberate extermination".<ref name=":1" /> Most edits of the article come from another white European, user Indy Beetle, from [[Swiss Confederation|Switzerland]].<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atrocities_in_the_Congo_Free_State&offset=&limit=500&action=history<br>Contains more than 160 edits by Wikipedia user Indy Beetle.</ref>

==== Nanjing Massacre denial ====
Japanese Wikipedia uses the title "Nanjing Incident" (南京事件) to refer to the [[Nanjing Massacre]] and does not include photos of [[Empire of Japan (1868–1947)|Japanese]] war crimes that are included in the Chinese and English instances.<ref name=":0" />

==== White genocide conspiracy theory ====
Wikipedia accuses the [[Republic of Haiti|Haitian]] revolutionary [[Jean-Jacques Dessalines]], who overthrew [[French]] [[colonialism]] and ended [[slavery]] in his country, of committing genocide against white colonists.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Wikipedia|title=Jean-Jacques Dessalines|date=2023-02-05|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jean-Jacques_Dessalines&oldid=1141432955|retrieved=2023-02-26}}</ref>
===Sexism===
Women have been speaking about the [[sexism]] they faced on Wikipedia for many years, as about 90% of the user base is male according to Wikipedia's own study.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Wikimedia|title=Gender across Wikimedia project contributors in 2018, weighted|date=2018|url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/LE15_Gender_overall_in_2018.png}}</ref>

Women are generally discouraged from participating through widespread bullying and harassment.<ref>Emma Paling. [https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/how-wikipedia-is-hostile-to-women/411619/ “Wikipedia's hostility to women”]. ''The Atlantic,'' 21 October 2015.</ref> Notably, several women were brought on board various projects aimed at reducing "gender bias" (Wikipedia's technical term for its sexist atmosphere), and all left after facing repeated harassment. This issue has been brought to the Wikimedia foundation's attention, to which founder Jimmy Wales responded, in one case:<blockquote>I'm afraid I don't know enough about the specific details here to be able to make a meaningful comment.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_178#Said_at_GGTF_arbitration</ref></blockquote>Articles about famous women are often deleted or see their edits reverted, rendering them invisible. Edits by women themselves are often reverted as well, no matter how good the quality may be.

=== Censorship ===
Wikipedia blocks the IP addresses of VPNs and other proxies, preventing users from mainland [[People's Republic of China|China]] from editing. They can apply for an account, but it takes an average of 41 days to receive a response. On 13 September 2021, Wikipedia purged many Chinese users, leading them to create [[Qiuwen Baike]] as an alternative.<ref name=":0" />

Wikipedia often deletes articles about topics outside of the [[Imperial core|West]]. For example, Chinese Wikipedia deleted an article about the Xuzhou urban expressway while keeping an article about a 200-meter-long street in [[Hong Kong Special Administrative Region|Hong Kong]].<ref name=":0" />

===Corruption and paid editing===
[[File:Wikipedia paid-editor policy example..png|thumb|366x366px|Wikipedia permits people paid by pro-capitalist organizations to edit on their articles.<ref name=":4" />]]
Although Wikipedia purports to be a reliable and neutral source of knowledge, it has been mangled by several known cases of corruption, involving paid editors hired to whitewash their clients' reputation. A former lawyer, user edsussman, has been hired by [[Meta Platforms, Inc.|Facebook]] PR, news companies Axios and [[National Broadcasting Company|NBC]] to tweak pages related to the respective client in a favorable manner, all while adhering to the rules of the site.<ref>Ashley Feinberg. [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wikipedia-paid-editing-pr-facebook-nbc-axios_n_5c63321be4b03de942967225 “Facebook, Axios And NBC paid this guy to whitewash Wikipedia pages”]. ''The Huffpost,'' 14 March 2019.</ref>

The Wikimedia Foundation collects over $100 million per year even though only $10 million is needed to keep Wikipedia running. It raises money by lying that Wikipedia needs more money to avoid shutting down.<ref name=":0" />[[File:Wikipedia imperialist censorship.png|alt=Wikipedia censorship of trustworthy news media.|thumb|These are news sources which Wikipedia considers unreliable. Highlighted in yellow are actually trustworthy sources of information which disputes the US imperialist propaganda narrative.]]

=== Source Policy ===
Wikipedia has long list of news media sources sorted by 'reliability'<ref>{{Web citation|author=Wikipedia Editors|newspaper=Wikipedia|title=Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources|date=Today|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources|retrieved=2024-02-04|quote=The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed.}}</ref> as seen in the graphic on the right. This list is sorted in sort into 5 categories: "generally reliable", "no consensus", "generally unreliable", "depreciated", "blacklisted"<ref>{{Web citation|author=Ibid}}</ref>

Viewed through the lens of imperialism, the first four are better read, in general terms as: 

Pushes whatever the [[USA State department|US State Department]] wants [generally reliable],

Mixes imperialist lies and half-truths with facts correctly describing [[material conditions]] [no consensus], 

Follows the political line of an enemy country to the USA, such as [[Iran]] and [[Russia]] or consistently pushes a socialist or anti-imperialist line [generally unreliable],[depreciated].

The final category, [blacklisted] is [[Hegelianism|kernel of truth]] at the center of these ratings. It correctly identifies sources that push clickbait, snuff violence, antisemitism, conspiracy theory, false medical science, AI spam/content farms, and so on.

==Ties to imperialist organizations==
The Wikiscanner tracing program has revealed that the CIA and FBI edited Wikipedia articles on the [[Iraq War]] and [[Guantánamo Bay detention camp|Guantánamo Bay]] prison.<ref>{{News citation|author=Randall Mikkelsen|newspaper=[[Reuters]]|title=CIA, FBI computers used for Wikipedia edits|date=2007-08-16|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia/cia-fbi-computers-used-for-wikipedia-edits-idUSN1642896020070816|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220411092828/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia/cia-fbi-computers-used-for-wikipedia-edits-idUSN1642896020070816|archive-date=2022-04-11|retrieved=2022-05-24}}</ref>

===Funding===
In spite of Wikipedia systematically and regularly requesting its readers to donate money, Wikipedia, along with its parent organisations, makes over $100 million USD each year, far more than the amount needed for its upkeep.<ref name=":5" /> Furthermore, the Wikimedia Foundation has ties with Western corporations such as [[Amazon.com, Inc.|Amazon]],<ref>{{News citation|author=Andreas Kolbe|newspaper=Daliy Dot|title=Wikipedia is swimming in money—why is it begging people to donate?|date=2021-5-24|url=https://www.dailydot.com/debug/wikipedia-endownemnt-fundraising/|retrieved=2022-7-30|quote=Just five years later, the endowment passed $90 million, and the $100 million mark, now described as an “initial goal,” will be reached this year. Major donations from Amazon, Google, Facebook, and others have been supplemented by legacy gifts—and $25 million from the WMF itself. 

It’s noteworthy that money donated to the endowment is not included in the WMF’s reported net assets ($180 million as of last June) or annual revenue ($130 million). Money the WMF pays into the endowment, however, is recorded under expenditures (“Awards and Grants”). These two facts disguise that the WMF has effectively operated with a far larger surplus for the past five years than its financial statements indicate—they “only” show a $100 million increase in net assets over that time period. In reality, the WMF’s total funds have increased by twice as much.

The endowment is not the only money Wikimedia funnels to the Tides Foundation. Last year, when the WMF literally had more money than it knew what to do with, with community events canceled due to the pandemic, it transferred another $8.7 million to a new “Tides Advocacy” fund.}}</ref> and some of its largest donors are [[Google Inc.|Google]], [[Microsoft Corporation|Microsoft]], and [[Apple Inc.|Apple]].<ref name=":5" />

==External links==

=== Alternatives ===

* [https://baike.baidu.com/ Baidu Baike] (Chinese)
* [https://www.ecured.cu/EcuRed EcuRed] (Spanish)
* [https://wiki.leftypol.org/wiki/Main_Page Leftypedia] (English)
* [https://prolewiki.org/ ProleWiki] (multilingual)
* [https://ru.ruwiki.ru/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0 Ruwiki] (multilingual)
* [https://www.qiuwenbaike.cn/wiki/Qiuwen:%E9%A6%96%E9%A1%B5 Qiuwen Baike] (Chinese)

==References==
<references />
[[Category:Wikis]]
[[Category:Online encyclopedias]]
[[Category:Capitalist progaganda]]
[[Category:Bourgeois media]]
[[Category:Disinformation]]