|
Tags: Replaced Reverted Visual edit |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[File:UN resolution A-77-445.png|thumb|[[United Nations|UN]] General Assembly resolution A/77/445 advocated for an end to the unipolar world order.]]
| | '''Multipolarity''' (from Latin ''multus'', many and ''polarity'', poles) is a revisionist pipe-dream which calls for the expansion of imperialist war (but only when done by Eastern imperialist powers such as Russia and China) and empowerment of the Russo-Chinese bourgeoisie. |
| [[File:Multipolarity poll.png|thumb|People from the [[United States of America|USA]], [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland|UK]], [[European Union|Western Europe]], [[Russian Federation|Russia]], [[People's Republic of China|China]], and [[Republic of Turkey|Turkey]] expect a multipolar world by 2033 while [[Republic of India|Indians]] expect U.S. dominance to continue.]]
| |
| '''Multipolarity''' (from Latin ''multus'', many and ''polarity'', poles) is a term that describes, in politics, a situation where there are more than three so-called world powers existing concurrently. | |
|
| |
|
| A multipolar world has existed has various times in history, but after the [[Second World War]], the [[United States of America]] cemented its position as the sole power of the world (sometimes in concurrence with the [[Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (1922–1991)|USSR]]). Starting in the late 2010s however, that position has been challenged by [[People's Republic of China|China]], which is why the concept of multipolarity has entered the discourse recently.
| | [[Revisionism|"Multipolarists" seek a Third World War in order to create enough death and misery in Europe and North America so as to empower the Russian ruling class. Then, after Russia has seized control of Europe.... uh.... they somehow become ''not'' imperialist and decide to allow socialism to exist... because... reasons?]] |
| | |
| Polarity should not be limited solely to economical powers but generally as influence. [[Japan]], for example, was the second global economy in terms of GDP after the fall of the Soviet Union, but as they were in the sphere of influence of the United States, they did not form a bloc against their influence and thus were not competing, but working alongside them.
| |
| | |
| The polarity of [[global politics]] can be understood [[Dialectics|dialectically]], but is not solely a [[Marxism|Marxist]] concept and does not necessarily refer to an [[Imperialism|imperialist]] world order.
| |
| | |
| == History ==
| |
| While multipolarity has existed at various times in history and even in close geographical regions (for example, in the 17th century, European colonial powers such as [[France]], [[Spain]] or [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland|Great Britain]] were competing as regional powers in the Americas), a multipolar world has not existed since the 20th century, where global trade and information make unipolar hegemony all the more impactful.
| |
| | |
| After the Second World War, the United States of America came about as the unipolar [[Hegemony|hegemon]], sometimes contested by the USSR in a bipolar world.
| |
| | |
| This position the USA created for themselves was helped by being mostly untouched during the war, as well as the [[Marshall Plan]] and the creation of the [[petrodollar]], a term describing a process by which oil producers sell their product in US Dollars (even if the buyer is not the USA), which ultimately find themselves circulated back to the US bourgeoisie.
| |
| | |
| The Soviet Union was able to compete in some ways with the hegemony of the United States, but stretched their resources thin trying to combat the bigger power everywhere, which left them open for [[Colour revolution|colour revolutions]] in their later years, ultimately leading to a coup to overthrow the Soviet government and install a pro-West capitalist puppet in their place.
| |
| | |
| == Unipolar world ==
| |
| After the [[overthrow of the Soviet Union]] in 1991 and the subsequent humanitarian crisis, the USA came about as the world's hegemon -- they essentially enjoyed being above [[international law]], dictating law and government to other countries, circulating trade back to their own economy, etc.
| |
| | |
| This situation lasted until the 2010s or so, when China, under the [[Belt and Road Initiative]] and helped by their massive economy (they were the second country with the highest [[Gross Domestic Product|GDP]] since 2010) took up a bigger share of the world's trade, eating into the USA's share and aligning countries towards their own policies, as they offer better deals than the imperialist bloc.
| |
| | |
| Coupled with the end of the US Empire that is happening at this moment, we are seeing the end of a unipolar world and are already in the beginnings of a multipolar world where both China and the USA form competing hegemonies.
| |
| | |
| === Response from the imperialist hegemon ===
| |
| Imperialism being the highest stage of capitalism, the USA is of course its fiercest proponent and example. Losing its status as the prime imperial power would mean the end of the American way of life for its bourgeoisie, and as such they try everything they can, often with disastrous results, to maintain a unipolar world.
| |
| | |
| In January 2020, the United States illegally killed [[Islamic Republic of Iran|Iranian]] General [[Qasem Soleimani]] in a drone strike,<ref>{{News citation|date=2020-07-09|title=Qasem Soleimani: US strike on Iran general was unlawful, UN expert says|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-53345885|newspaper=BBC}}</ref> after which Iran retorted with a missile strike on two US airbases in [[Republic of Iraq|Iraq]].<ref>{{News citation|journalist=Erdogan Cagatay Zontur, Servet Günerigök|date=2020-01-08|title=Iran hits Iraqi military bases housing US troops|url=https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/iran-hits-iraqi-military-bases-housing-us-troops/1695644#|newspaper=Anadolu Agency}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| In 2021, the US Congress voted the [[Strategic Competition Act of 2021]]<ref>{{News citation|journalist=US Congress|title=S.1169 - Strategic Competition Act of 2021|archive-url=https://archive.ph/JaL8I}}</ref> that would give 300 million dollars a year to, notably, "develop and implement a plan for increasing the U.S. presence in the Indo-Pacific region" and "authorize various foreign military financing and diplomatic activities in Southeast Asia and the Indo-Pacific region" a clear admission of regime change operations to come.
| |
| | |
| Around the same time, it was revealed by The Herald that the United States was offering 1000 dollars per article in African newspapers that disparaged and lied about China and their investments on the continent.<ref>{{News citation|date=2021-09-21|title=US plan to discredit Chinese investments unmasked|url=https://www.herald.co.zw/us-plan-to-discredit-chinese-investments-unmasked/|newspaper=The Herald|archive-url=https://archive.ph/HrDgm|archive-date=2021-11-14}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| In 2022, following the [[2022 Russo-Ukranian conflict|Russian invasion of Ukraine]], the United States was the first to propose sanctions on [[Russian Federation|Russia]] which were quickly adopted by their lapdogs in Europe<ref>{{News citation|date=2022-03-03|title=List of sanctions against Russia after it invaded Ukraine|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/2/25/list-of-sanctions-on-russia-after-invasion|newspaper=Al Jazeera}}</ref>. As the world still relies on oil (whether Russian or not), this quickly led to price [[inflation]] and the United States is now asking for [[Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela|Venezuelan]] oil<ref>{{News citation|journalist=Anatoly Kurmanaev, Natalie Kitroeff, Kenneth P. Vogel|date=2022-03-05|title=U.S. Officials Travel to Venezuela, a Russia Ally, as the West Isolates Putin|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/05/world/americas/venezuela-russia-usa.html|newspaper=New York Times}}</ref> despite having tried to coup [[Nicolás Maduro]] in favour of [[Juan Guaidó]].
| |
| | |
| Moreover, due to the sanctions on the SWIFT system (essentially banning Russia from global trade), Russia traded oil in Yuan for the first time, and was shortly followed by [[Kingdom of Saudi Arabia|Saudi Arabia]]. Essentially, countries in the same situation as Russia (powerful but on the periphery of the imperialist hegemon) have received a signal that going against [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization|NATO]]'s wishes would get their economy crippled and their government possibly toppled, and thus they are moving closer to China (joining the CIPS system for example, an alternative to SWIFT) for their own security.
| |
|
| |
|
| == References == | | == References == |
