Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Contradiction: Difference between revisions

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
More languages
No edit summary
m (rewrote the example of attack and defence to use better language)
Tag: Visual edit
Line 4: Line 4:
# And one cannot exist without the other
# And one cannot exist without the other


For example: in warfare, attack and defence form a contradiction; without an attack, there is no need for defence (rule 2) and also, defence is the opposite of attack (rule 1).  
For example: in warfare, attack and defence form a contradiction; defence is the opposite of the attack and is only present when an attack is present (rule 1) and secondly, there is no need for defence if there is no attack (rule 2).


Note that diametrically opposed does not necessarily mean the literal opposite. The bourgeoisie and proletariat are in contradiction: one cannot exist without the other, and their class interests are diametrically opposed (the bourgeoisie wants to exploit the proletariat, and the proletariat wants to destroy the bourgeoisie as a class so as to liberate themselves).
Note that diametrically opposed does not necessarily mean the literal opposite. The bourgeoisie and proletariat are in contradiction: one cannot exist without the other, and their class interests are diametrically opposed (the bourgeoisie wants to exploit the proletariat, and the proletariat wants to destroy the bourgeoisie as a class so as to liberate themselves).

Revision as of 16:17, 27 December 2020

In dialectics, a contradiction is formed when two requirements are met:

  1. Two things must be diametrically opposed
  2. And one cannot exist without the other

For example: in warfare, attack and defence form a contradiction; defence is the opposite of the attack and is only present when an attack is present (rule 1) and secondly, there is no need for defence if there is no attack (rule 2).

Note that diametrically opposed does not necessarily mean the literal opposite. The bourgeoisie and proletariat are in contradiction: one cannot exist without the other, and their class interests are diametrically opposed (the bourgeoisie wants to exploit the proletariat, and the proletariat wants to destroy the bourgeoisie as a class so as to liberate themselves).

Contradictions exist everywhere in the world and in many different domains, and it is the solving of contradictions (or the apparition of new ones) that drive change in the general sense of the term, thus dialectics happen.

Chairman Mao Zedong talked at length about contradictions and is a good starting place for theory.

Primary and secondary contradictions

Contradictions are separated into primary and secondary categories. Secondary contradictions are dependent on primary ones, and solving the primary contradiction solves the secondary contradiction.

Some think, for example, that solving class contradictions (moving into communism, a classless society) will also solve several secondary contradictions attached such as: racism, homophobia, sexism, selfishness, etc. This is an example of primary and secondary contradictions. For others, it is impossible to solve secondary contradictions without addressing the primary contradiction.

Solving contradictions

A contradiction is solved when it stops existing; i.e. when both rules stop being applicable.

Thus the proletariat will stop existing as a class when the bourgeoisie stops existing. However, in that scenario, one of two things may happen:

  1. Another contradiction takes its place
  2. The contradiction is solved for good

In this example, it means that the proletariat may be replaced by another class -- but inevitably, so will the bourgeoisie (much like how serfs and nobles were replaced by capitalist social classes). Thus another contradiction would take place between these two classes. Or classes could stop existing at all, which would usher in a classless era and solve class contradictions for good (since there are no more classes).

Further Reading

Mao Zedong On Contradiction