More languages
More actions
Anarchism is a petty bourgeois political-social tendency, hostile to all power, including that of the dictatorship of the proletariat; it opposes the interests of small private property and the small peasant economy to the progress of society supported by large production. The philosophical basis of anarchism is individualism, subjectivism and voluntarism.[1]
Origin
The advent of anarchism is tied to the names of Schmidt (Stirner), Proudhon and Bakunin, whose utopian theories were subjected to criticism in the works of Marx and Engels. In the nineteenth century, anarchism spread through France, Italy and Spain.[1]
Characteristics
Anarchism does not go beyond general phrases against exploitation, it does not understand what the causes of exploitation are, nor the class struggle as a creative force for the realization of socialism. The anarchist denial of political struggle contributes objectively to the subordination of the working class to bourgeois politics.
The most essential thing in the struggle against anarchism lies in the problem of how the revolution should proceed in relation to the State and in the problem of the State in general. Anarchists advocate the immediate annihilation of the State, they do not recognize that it is possible to take advantage of the bourgeois State to prepare the proletariat for the revolution.
After 1917, anarchism in Russia became a counter-revolutionary tendency. Today, it enjoys a certain influence in the United States and Europe.[1]
Distinctions between Marxists and Anarchists
The essential distinctions in the criteria of Marxists and anarchists were reduced by Lenin to three fundamental points:
- In that the first, whose end is the complete withering away of the State, acknowledge that this end can only be achieved after the socialist revolution has abolished classes as a result of the establishment of socialism. The latter, on the other hand, want to completely destroy the State overnight, without understanding the conditions in which this destruction can take place.
- The first acknowledge the need for the proletariat, after conquering political power, to totally destroy the former State machine, replacing it with a new one. The latter advocate the destruction of the state machine and have an absolutely confused idea of what the proletariat must replace the machine with and how it will exercise revolutionary power. Anarchists reject even the use of state power by the revolutionary proletariat, their revolutionary dictatorship.
- The first demand that the proletariat prepare for revolution by taking advantage of the modern State, while anarchists reject it.[2]