Good day, comrade. I wish to concede that you are largely correct; Prolewiki is not the corporate news, we do not write and record these events based upon its present fad-like popularity with Marxists for the sake of attention, nor is this encyclopædia merely a platform for individual editors to promote their own ideological tendency (not in the articles, at least).
I, in ultimacy, think that the recent edits were beneficial to our long-term coverage of this organisation (my edits clearly contained some degreee of recency bias; focusing far to much on the recent scandal, not on the overall history and ideology of the CPI). I myself have studied the CPI for some years now, particularly its leader, Caleb Maupin, and personally, I believe that they are little than opportunists, that only serve to weaken the Communist movement in my country. However, I understand that this is only my view, not the overall view of Communists, therefore, if these edits serve to fairly represent the collective views of Communists - let them exist.