More languages
More actions
1) i found prolewiki through the user GojiraTheWumao as we talk quite alot on discord and he has linked me many of his articles.
2) i would like to contribute works on how marxism can be applied to my country of birth (the uk), queer marxism, Methods for revolution in the imperial core and history of marxism and anti capitalism in Britain.
3) i agree with the principles of the website, i am particularly glad to see the collective ownership and governance of the website as it means that a writers have the freedom to write about the topics they wish within the anti reactionary and marxist leninist framework.
4)as a transgender woman myself, i believe that the struggle for transgender and lgbtq liberation is integral to any truly revolutionary organisation, the freedom of gender expression is not something for the state (capitalist or otherwise) to regulate or have any interest in. Without a dedication the LGBTQ+ liberation from the capitalist system the proletariat can never be truly united.
5) I take great inspiration from both stalin and mao (Stalin more so). in my mind stalin is an exemplification of a marxist leninist and how to put marxism leninism into practice, whilst not making so many theoretical contributions as Lenin or Marx, he still made some excellent works on materialism and the national question. Without the work of stalin (and the wider soviet leadership and people) Nazism would have prevailed, leading to the systematic murder of countless people. i do however have some criticisms of stalin, namely the deportations that happened across the 1940's (I am not extremely knowledgeable on this so criticism of this point is wanted) and stalins emphasis on heavy industry.
With regard to mao, i view him as one of the greatest revolutionary leaders of all time and one of the greatest marxist theoreticians in history. this does not however mean that i see Maoism as universally applicable, I would not think it wise to start a protracted peoples war in rural england for example. now again this not to say that maoism is not applicable in any cases as it evidently achieved success in china and is to my knowledge thriving in the Philippines. Mao himself deserves to be revered among revolutionaries just as stalin of castro, however many of maoisms proponents (especially in the west) are extremely aggressive and dogmatic to anyone who is not explicitly maoist themselves
6) i do believe all these states are socialist, here is why:
China-Modern-day China can be considered socialist from a Marxist-Leninist framework due to several key factors. First and foremost, the Chinese Communist Party remains the ruling party, guided by Marxist-Leninist ideology, which forms the basis of its policies and governance. The party's commitment to socialist principles is reflected in its efforts to reduce poverty, improve social welfare, and promote social equality. China's socialist orientation is evident in its economic model, which combines state-owned enterprises with a vibrant private sector. While the market plays a significant role, the state maintains control over strategic industries and key sectors of the economy. This approach allows for economic growth and wealth creation while ensuring that the government can steer the country's development in line with socialist principles. Additionally, China's educational system continues to emphasize Marxist theory, and the government promotes ideological education to strengthen socialist consciousness among its citizens. Overall, these factors demonstrate China's commitment to socialism and its adherence to Marxist-Leninist principles in shaping its political, economic, and social systems.
Vietnam-Vietnam can be considered socialist due to its adherence to Marxist principles and the central role of the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) in governance. The CPV upholds Marxist-Leninist ideology and has maintained a strong commitment to socialist principles throughout the country's development. Vietnam's economy follows a socialist-oriented market model, with a combination of state-owned enterprises and a growing private sector. The state retains control over key industries and strategic sectors, ensuring that the commanding heights of the economy remain in the hands of the working class. The government's policies prioritize social welfare, poverty reduction, and equitable distribution of resources. Additionally, the CPV promotes ideological education and fosters a socialist consciousness among its citizens. Vietnam's commitment to socialist principles, its implementation of policies that prioritize the interests of the working class, and the central role of the CPV all contribute to the characterization of modern-day Vietnam as a socialist country within a Marxist-Leninist framework.
Cuba-Cuba can be recognized as a socialist country within a Marxist-Leninist framework due to its steadfast commitment to socialist principles and the leading role of the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) in its governance. The PCC upholds the ideology of Marxism-Leninism as the guiding force behind its policies and decision-making processes. Cuba's economic system is characterized by collective ownership of the means of production, with the state controlling key sectors and industries. The government ensures that the benefits of economic development are distributed equitably among the population, prioritizing social welfare, education, healthcare, and other basic needs. The PCC remains dedicated to the principles of social justice, solidarity, and the empowerment of the working class. Furthermore, Cuba's emphasis on ideological education and fostering a socialist consciousness among its citizens demonstrates its commitment to maintaining and strengthening the socialist system. Overall, Cuba's adherence to socialist principles, the central role of the PCC, and its efforts to prioritize social welfare exemplify its status as a socialist country within a Marxist-Leninist framework.
DPRK-Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), commonly known as North Korea, can be identified as a socialist country within a Marxist-Leninist framework due to its unwavering commitment to socialist principles and the leading role of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK) in governance. The WPK upholds the ideology of Juche, which combines Marxist-Leninist principles with an emphasis on self-reliance, national sovereignty, and the primacy of the Korean people. The DPRK's economic system is based on collective ownership of the means of production, with the state playing a central role in guiding economic activities. The government prioritizes social welfare, providing universal healthcare, education, and other essential services to its citizens. The state maintains control over key sectors, ensuring that the benefits of economic development are directed towards the betterment of the working class and the broader population. Moreover, the DPRK's commitment to ideological education, self-sufficiency, and a strong sense of national identity reflects its dedication to maintaining a socialist system. These factors collectively establish the DPRK as a socialist country within the framework of Marxist-Leninist principles.
Laos-Modern-day Laos can be identified as a socialist country within a Marxist-Leninist framework due to its adherence to socialist principles and the leading role of the Lao People's Revolutionary Party (LPRP) in governance. The LPRP upholds the ideology of Marxism-Leninism and has made significant strides in implementing socialist policies. Laos' economic system follows a socialist-oriented model, with state-owned enterprises playing a key role in strategic industries and sectors. The government prioritizes social welfare and poverty reduction, focusing on improving education, healthcare, and infrastructure development for the benefit of the working class and the broader population. The LPRP's commitment to ideological education and the promotion of a socialist consciousness among its citizens underscores its dedication to upholding socialist values. Laos' focus on collective ownership, equitable distribution of resources, and the empowerment of the working class exemplifies its socialist character within a Marxist-Leninist framework.
Secondary questions
Dialectical materialism is a philosophical framework that underpins the understanding of social, historical, and natural phenomena. It combines the principles of dialectics, which emphasize the interplay of contradictions and the development of change, with materialism, which recognizes the primacy of material conditions in shaping society and history.
In dialectical materialism, reality is seen as a constantly evolving and contradictory process driven by the conflict and interaction of opposing forces. These contradictions arise from the inherent conflicts between the productive forces and the relations of production within a given social system. The resolution of these contradictions leads to qualitative changes and progress in the development of society.
According to Marxist-Leninist thought, dialectical materialism provides a scientific understanding of the laws that govern the social and natural world. It allows for an analysis of social phenomena based on their material foundations, including the economic base, class relations, and the historical development of societies. By understanding the underlying material conditions, dialectical materialism provides a framework to analyse and transform social realities.
Dialectical materialism also emphasizes the role of praxis, the combination of theory and practice, in transforming society. It recognizes that theory must be constantly tested and refined through practical application in order to achieve revolutionary change. Marxist-Leninists believe that dialectical materialism provides a guiding framework for understanding the contradictions and dynamics of class struggle, leading to the establishment of a socialist society and ultimately communism.
2)I primarily wish to contribute the different essays i have written on Marxism in britain, i also plan on writing articles on queer marxism and organisation strategies
4) i have not read any theory on marxist feminism but from what i know, feminism and queer liberation is just as integral to socialism as queer liberation is. the patriarchy only serves to keep the current mode of production and advance the goals of the bourgeoise.
5)I think the abolition of the 'nuclear family' as a societal norm, as well as the roles that come along with it are important in a communist society, the capitalist relations within the family must also be abolished. The general concept of a family should not be abolished as i see no reason for it to be and family, be it non blood related or blood related, family should remain as a societal concept within communism
6) i believe that the most pressing issue for communists in Britain is opposing british and wider western imperialism, Revolution in britain cannot succeed whilst the imperialist relations to the global south still exist.