First Part 1. I heard it being mentioned on a leftist discord called the Deprogram.
2. I currently uphold Marxism-Leninism with some Maoist thought. Although I still have a lot to learn and my reading list is ever increasing. I am currently a member of a socialist party.
3. I have read them and I have no objections.
4. It's a social construct which is another way of dividing our class into different groups and communities. The ruling class using this divide and class antagonism which pits us against each other to wage a culture war. Us proletarians must support the LGBT community, as we would with all other oppressed communities otherwise we let the bourgeoise win.
5. I am critically supportive of Stalin and his efforts to bring about communism not just into the USSR and her allies but to the rest of Europe and the rest of the World. I realise his role was critical in furthering Marxism alongside with Lenin and Mao and he was the first to create and lead the first Socialist State in history. However, he made some unfortunately devastating decisions before WWII that were not entirely his fault because there was no precedent to his decisions as to what would happen. I still believe that the post SSR Hungary is evidently and without a doubt was far far better than what it currently is in the modern day.
6. China is a socialist country with their own definition of democratic participation unlike the neoliberal states. It has both socialist and semi-planned markets, with the bourgeoisie under the firm and unyielding control of a communist party, and a dedication to internal improvement of the conditions of the working class. I believe this makes them socialist. Vietnam and Cuba are similar to the above description and are also socialist. Although I still need to learn a lot about the DPRK, as far as I know they operate under a Juche (self-sufficiency) policy, their own development of ML, as a response to their conditions. I believe them also to be socialist just the same. I am the least familiar with Laos, but as far as I know, they also fit the definition. Cuba, Vietnam and the DPRK being directly involved in a war against the imperialist USA, they show that even against one of the biggest neoliberal imperialist nations there is hope for a successful revolution anywhere across the world.
Second Part 1. A kind of scientific thought which is a way of looking at human history through the lens of how the development of the material conditions developed and changed our qualities as humans.
2. I'd like to provide sources for currently existing articles and entries and I'd like to provide some translations of articles and entries to Hungarian so I can provide a consistent leftist source for educating my fellow comrades.
5. Yes, we should by way of providing universal welfare; communal luxury and queer self-determination. It promotes the idea that no human should ever own or control another by way of emotional scarcity and blackmail.
6. I think I'm probably wrong on this but it's the fratricidal split between leftists the issue. We need leftist unity so we can come together as one to fight the class war waged between us and the bourgeoise. Once us the proletariat rule and control our own means of production then we can argue how society should be run/guided.
7. I'm not that well read in that subject but If I had to guess Marxism is based in facts and history and the relationship between the material conditions of ones country and their people unlike the rest of the anti-capitalist movements.
I am currently residing in an imperialist core country and looking to educate my fellow comrades.