Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Topic on Comradeship:MiladCabral

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia

On your issues with blurb pages

2
CriticalResist (talkcontribs)

Comrade,

We have undone the edit you made to the Mongolian People's Party page. In the administration's opinion, the deletion had no reason to be as the paragraph was factual and sourced, and the message you left towards another editor in the changelog was unacceptable in its tone, as we urge every editor to remain respectful towards their comrades (It's in our Code of conduct and there's a reminder under every text box on the Wiki).

It's not up to individual editors, nor even up to the administration, to decide what should or should not appear on ProleWiki, it's on every editor to make this decision collectively. We understand that you dislike blurb pages, or at least that is our current understanding, because you have not articulated your actual issue with those types of edits. Without more communication on your part, we are left to understand that you have a problem with another editor specifically.

If that's the case, we can organise mediation with an administrator present, but reverting edits or starting feuds on the Wiki is not a productive way to go about it.

Finally, I would like to encourage you to source your contributions. While your pages are very comprehensive and exhaustive, they lack sources which makes their content less authoritative to readers. As a reminder on finding sources, they don't need to be academic texts or physical books necessarily and can be web pages (even from websites you wouldn't visit otherwise; I often google for my sources), but they need to support a claim that is being made, otherwise sourceless content will be dismissed by readers as a simple personal opinion.

Edit: Apologies for not signing off. Thank you for your understanding.

MiladCabral (talkcontribs)

If you could please make a conversational chat with everyone involved, instead of using a council of non-involved, biased people with bigot preferences. I don't think people's ideas can be solved if people who don't talk to people who have an issue up front with that person. A swell as speaking for other people is not just.

By clicking "Reply", you agree to the terms of use for this wiki.