Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Freedom House: Difference between revisions

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
More languages
(Created page with "thumb|Freedom in the world 2024 according to Freedom House. Imperialist countries and their allies are generally considered 'free' while [[Dictatorship of the proletariat|dictatorships of the proletariat and anti-imperialist countries are considered outright 'unfree'.]] '''Freedom House''' is a registered NGO operating out of the United States of America and funded in 1941. Each year, they publis...")
Tag: Visual edit
 
No edit summary
Tag: Visual edit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Freedom in the world 2024 freedom house map.png|thumb|Freedom in the world 2024 according to Freedom House. Imperialist countries and their allies are generally considered 'free' while [[Dictatorship of the proletariat|dictatorships of the proletariat]] and anti-imperialist countries are considered outright 'unfree'.]]
[[File:Freedom in the world 2024 freedom house map.png|thumb|Freedom in the world 2024 according to Freedom House. Imperialist countries and their allies are generally considered 'free' while [[Dictatorship of the proletariat|dictatorships of the proletariat]] and anti-imperialist countries are considered outright 'unfree'.]]
'''Freedom House''' is a registered NGO operating out of the [[United States|United States of America]] and funded in 1941.
'''Freedom House''' is a registered [[Non-governmental organisation|NGO]] operating out of the [[United States|United States of America]], founded in 1941.


Each year, they publish the ''Freedom in the world'' report<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Freedom House|title=Freedom in the World|date=2024|url=https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world}}</ref> which looks at the "freedom status" of some 210 countries and territories. The methodology for this map is based on [[liberal]] and [[libertarian]] ideals, such as a multiparty republic scoring more 'freedom' points over a one-party dictatorship of the proletariat.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Freedom House|title=Freedom in the World Research Methodology|url=https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology|quote=B. Political Pluralism & Participation
Each year, they publish the ''Freedom in the World'' report<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Freedom House|title=Freedom in the World|date=2024|url=https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world}}</ref> which looks at the "freedom status" of some 210 [[Country|countries]] and territories. The methodology for this map is based on [[liberal]] and [[libertarian]] ideals, such as a [[multi-party system]] scoring more 'freedom' points over a [[one-party system]].<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Freedom House|title=Freedom in the World Research Methodology|url=https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology|quote=B. Political Pluralism & Participation


     B1: Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings?}}</ref> Additionally, the organization considers the [[free market]] and otherwise lack of regulations in the economy to be an indicator of freedom as well.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Freedom House|title=Freedom in the World Research Methodology|url=https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology|quote=G4: Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? [...]
     B1: Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings?}}</ref> Additionally, the organisation considers the [[free market]] and otherwise lack of regulations in the economy to be an indicator of freedom as well.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Freedom House|title=Freedom in the World Research Methodology|url=https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology|quote=G4: Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? [...]


Does tight government control over the economy, including through state ownership or the setting of prices and production quotas, inhibit individuals’ economic opportunity?}}</ref>
Does tight government control over the economy, including through state ownership or the setting of prices and production quotas, inhibit individuals’ economic opportunity?}}</ref>


[[Influence Watch]] noted that most of the funding to Freedom House comes from the US government. In 2018, $35 million of the $40 million the organization received came from federal grants. Freedom House admits that most of its funding comes from [[USAID|United States Agency for International Development]] and the [[NED|National Endowment for Democracy]], two CIA cutout organizations.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Influence Watch|title=Non-profit Freedom House|url=https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/freedom-house/}}</ref>
[[Influence Watch]] noted that most of the funding to Freedom House comes from the [[Government of the United States of America|US government]]. In 2018, $35 million of the $40 million the organisation received came from federal grants. Freedom House admits that most of its funding comes from [[USAID|United States Agency for International Development]] and the [[NED|National Endowment for Democracy]], two [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] cutout organisations.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Influence Watch|title=Non-profit Freedom House|url=https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/freedom-house/}}</ref>


In 2024, Switzerland-based [[Proton AG]], the encrypted email and VPN provider, started a user-funded fundraiser for 10 recipients, one of which was Freedom House.
In 2024, [[Swiss Confederation|Switzerland]]-based [[Proton AG]], the encrypted email and VPN provider, started a user-funded fundraiser for 10 recipients, one of which was Freedom House.<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Proton|title=Join the 2024 Lifetime account fundraiser for online freedom|date=2024-12-16|url=https://proton.me/blog/2024-lifetime-account-charity-fundraiser}}</ref>


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 14:27, 26 December 2024

Freedom in the world 2024 according to Freedom House. Imperialist countries and their allies are generally considered 'free' while dictatorships of the proletariat and anti-imperialist countries are considered outright 'unfree'.

Freedom House is a registered NGO operating out of the United States of America, founded in 1941.

Each year, they publish the Freedom in the World report[1] which looks at the "freedom status" of some 210 countries and territories. The methodology for this map is based on liberal and libertarian ideals, such as a multi-party system scoring more 'freedom' points over a one-party system.[2] Additionally, the organisation considers the free market and otherwise lack of regulations in the economy to be an indicator of freedom as well.[3]

Influence Watch noted that most of the funding to Freedom House comes from the US government. In 2018, $35 million of the $40 million the organisation received came from federal grants. Freedom House admits that most of its funding comes from United States Agency for International Development and the National Endowment for Democracy, two CIA cutout organisations.[4]

In 2024, Switzerland-based Proton AG, the encrypted email and VPN provider, started a user-funded fundraiser for 10 recipients, one of which was Freedom House.[5]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. "Freedom in the World" (2024). Freedom House.
  2. “B. Political Pluralism & Participation

    B1: Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings?”

    "Freedom in the World Research Methodology". Freedom House.
  3. “G4: Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? [...]

    Does tight government control over the economy, including through state ownership or the setting of prices and production quotas, inhibit individuals’ economic opportunity?”

    "Freedom in the World Research Methodology". Freedom House.
  4. "Non-profit Freedom House". Influence Watch.
  5. "Join the 2024 Lifetime account fundraiser for online freedom" (2024-12-16). Proton.