Library:Vladimir Lenin/Materialism and empirio-criticism: Difference between revisions
From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
More languages
More actions
Tag: Visual edit |
Tag: Visual edit |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== The theory of knowledge of empirio-criticism and of dialectical materialism. II == | == The theory of knowledge of empirio-criticism and of dialectical materialism. II == | ||
=== The “thing-in-itself,” or V. Chernov refutes Frederich Engels === | |||
=== “Transcendence,” or Bazarov “revises” Engels === | |||
=== L. Feuerbach and J. Dietzgen on the thing-in-itself === | |||
=== Does objective truth exist? === | |||
=== Absolute and relative truth, or the eclecticism of Engels as discovered by A. Bogdanov === | |||
=== The criterion of practice in the theory of knowledge === | |||
== The theory of knowledge of empirio-criticism and of dialectical materialism. III == | == The theory of knowledge of empirio-criticism and of dialectical materialism. III == | ||
=== What is matter? What is experience? === | |||
=== Plekhanov’s error concerning the concept “experience” === | |||
=== Causality and necessity in nature === | |||
=== The “principle of economy of thought” and the problem of the “unity of the world” === | |||
=== Space and time === | |||
=== Freedom and necessity === | |||
== The philosophical idealists as comrades-in-arms and successors of empirio-criticism == | == The philosophical idealists as comrades-in-arms and successors of empirio-criticism == | ||
=== The criticism of kantianism from the Left and from the Right === | |||
=== How the “empirio-symbolist” Yushkevich ridiculed the “empirio-criticist” Chernov === | |||
=== The immanentists as comrades-in-arms of Mach and Avenarius === | |||
=== Whither is empirio-criticism tending? === | |||
=== A. Bogdanov’s “empirio-monism” === | |||
=== The “theory of symbols” (or hieroglyphs) and the criticism of Helmholtz === | |||
=== Two kinds of criticism of Dühring === | |||
=== How ould J. Dietzgen have found favour with the reactionary philosophers? === | |||
== The recent revolution in natural science and philosophical idealism == | == The recent revolution in natural science and philosophical idealism == | ||
=== The crisis in modern Physics === | |||
=== “Matter has disappeared” === | |||
=== Is motion without matter conceivable? === | |||
=== The two trends in modern Physics and English spiritualism === | |||
=== The two trends in modern Physics, and German idealism === | |||
=== The two trends in modern Physics and French fideism === | |||
=== A Russian “idealist physicist” === | |||
=== The essence and significance of “physical” idealism === | |||
== Empirio-criticism and historical materialism == | == Empirio-criticism and historical materialism == | ||
=== The excursions of the German empirio-criticists into the field of the social sciences === | |||
=== How Bogdanov corrects and “develops” Marx === | |||
=== Suvorov’s “Foundations of Social Philosophy” === | |||
=== Parties in philosophy and philosophical blockheads === | |||
=== Ernst Haeckel and Ernst Mach === | |||
=== Conclusion === | |||
=== Supplement to chapter four, section I === | |||