Charhapiti (talk | contribs) (settler colonialism is not something of the past) |
(Some stuff to the term third world) Tag: Visual edit |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
To be a global south country is to be a country whose economy is suppressed under the conditions of imperialism. The Marxist usage of the "global south" follows the line used by AES countries like [[People's Republic of China|China]] according to the Marxist understanding of global [[imperialism]]. China is considered to be part of the South, despite them soon achieving the highest GDP in the world. [[Israel]] is considered to be part of the Global North, due to its establishment by and advancing the imperial interests of the Global North. | To be a global south country is to be a country whose economy is suppressed under the conditions of imperialism. The Marxist usage of the "global south" follows the line used by AES countries like [[People's Republic of China|China]] according to the Marxist understanding of global [[imperialism]]. China is considered to be part of the South, despite them soon achieving the highest GDP in the world. [[Israel]] is considered to be part of the Global North, due to its establishment by and advancing the imperial interests of the Global North. | ||
The term [[Third World]] is also sometimes used to talk about the Global South, but this word is considered outdated. The term "developing countries" is misleading, as it ignores the fact that the "developed" countries are the ones imperializing them: overexploiting and making them [[Dependency|economically dependent]] on export/imports from or to the global north.<ref name=":0" /> | The term [[Third World]] is also sometimes used to talk about the Global South, but this word is considered by many as outdated. The original analogy was used by French author Alfred Sauvy in his article "''Trois Mondes, une planète''" for ''L'Observateur'' in 1952, eventhough this etymology is contested, as a reference to the ''Tiers État'' (Third Estate) - this being a reference to to people who were not a member of the clergy (First Estate) or the nobility (Second Estate). More specifically, this is seen to be alluding in its usage to the oration of Abbé Siyès (1789): "What is the Third Estate? Everything. What has it been till now in the political order? Nothing. What does it want to be? Something.", i.e. expressing ideas of neglect, exploitation and revolutionary potential. The term Third Force was used in the 50s by the western press and academia as well as political leaders such as Nkrumah to designate a non-aligned bloc of countries within the Cold War, a usage that gradually merged with the term Third World in the 60s and 70s.<ref>{{Citation|author=Leslie Wolf-Phillips|year=1987|title=Why Third World'?: Origin, definition and usage|page=1311-1313|publisher=Third World Quarterly, 9:4, 1311-1327|doi=10.1080/01436598708420027}}</ref> | ||
The term "developing countries" is misleading, as it ignores the fact that the "developed" countries are the ones imperializing them: overexploiting and making them [[Dependency|economically dependent]] on export/imports from or to the global north.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
In 1500, the average income in [[Europe]] was only three times higher than in [[Africa]] and [[Asia]], but that difference grew to ten times by 1960.<ref name=":12222">{{Citation|author=[[Vijay Prashad]]|year=2008|title=The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World|chapter=Buenos Aires|page=66|pdf=https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzaceascnzh26r5d6uitjjs2z7rflhaxlt7rboz5whzdf76qg6xxvecqq?filename=%28A%20New%20Press%20People%27s%20history%29%20Vijay%20Prashad%20-%20The%20darker%20nations_%20a%20people%27s%20history%20of%20the%20third%20world-The%20New%20Press%20%282008%29.pdf|publisher=The New Press|isbn=9781595583420|lg=https://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=9B40B96E830128A7FE0E0E887C06829F}}</ref> In addition, in 1960, the richest 20 countries were 18 times as rich as the 20 poorest countries in terms of GDP per capita. This ratio grew to 37 times in 1995.<ref name=":1222">{{Citation|author=[[Vijay Prashad]]|year=2008|title=The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World|chapter=Conclusion|page=277|pdf=https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzaceascnzh26r5d6uitjjs2z7rflhaxlt7rboz5whzdf76qg6xxvecqq?filename=%28A%20New%20Press%20People%27s%20history%29%20Vijay%20Prashad%20-%20The%20darker%20nations_%20a%20people%27s%20history%20of%20the%20third%20world-The%20New%20Press%20%282008%29.pdf|publisher=The New Press|isbn=9781595583420|lg=https://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=9B40B96E830128A7FE0E0E887C06829F}}</ref> | In 1500, the average income in [[Europe]] was only three times higher than in [[Africa]] and [[Asia]], but that difference grew to ten times by 1960.<ref name=":12222">{{Citation|author=[[Vijay Prashad]]|year=2008|title=The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World|chapter=Buenos Aires|page=66|pdf=https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzaceascnzh26r5d6uitjjs2z7rflhaxlt7rboz5whzdf76qg6xxvecqq?filename=%28A%20New%20Press%20People%27s%20history%29%20Vijay%20Prashad%20-%20The%20darker%20nations_%20a%20people%27s%20history%20of%20the%20third%20world-The%20New%20Press%20%282008%29.pdf|publisher=The New Press|isbn=9781595583420|lg=https://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=9B40B96E830128A7FE0E0E887C06829F}}</ref> In addition, in 1960, the richest 20 countries were 18 times as rich as the 20 poorest countries in terms of GDP per capita. This ratio grew to 37 times in 1995.<ref name=":1222">{{Citation|author=[[Vijay Prashad]]|year=2008|title=The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World|chapter=Conclusion|page=277|pdf=https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzaceascnzh26r5d6uitjjs2z7rflhaxlt7rboz5whzdf76qg6xxvecqq?filename=%28A%20New%20Press%20People%27s%20history%29%20Vijay%20Prashad%20-%20The%20darker%20nations_%20a%20people%27s%20history%20of%20the%20third%20world-The%20New%20Press%20%282008%29.pdf|publisher=The New Press|isbn=9781595583420|lg=https://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=9B40B96E830128A7FE0E0E887C06829F}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 18:11, 3 September 2023
In geopolitics, the Global South is a general term that roughly designates the economically exploited countries. In contrast, the Global North encompasses the most advanced capitalist countries,[1] whose wealth was largely stolen capital generated from colonialism and imperialism.[2] "Global South" is separate from, but not mutually exclusive, to the reality of settler-colonialism as some global south countries can also be settler-colonial.
To be a global south country is to be a country whose economy is suppressed under the conditions of imperialism. The Marxist usage of the "global south" follows the line used by AES countries like China according to the Marxist understanding of global imperialism. China is considered to be part of the South, despite them soon achieving the highest GDP in the world. Israel is considered to be part of the Global North, due to its establishment by and advancing the imperial interests of the Global North.
The term Third World is also sometimes used to talk about the Global South, but this word is considered by many as outdated. The original analogy was used by French author Alfred Sauvy in his article "Trois Mondes, une planète" for L'Observateur in 1952, eventhough this etymology is contested, as a reference to the Tiers État (Third Estate) - this being a reference to to people who were not a member of the clergy (First Estate) or the nobility (Second Estate). More specifically, this is seen to be alluding in its usage to the oration of Abbé Siyès (1789): "What is the Third Estate? Everything. What has it been till now in the political order? Nothing. What does it want to be? Something.", i.e. expressing ideas of neglect, exploitation and revolutionary potential. The term Third Force was used in the 50s by the western press and academia as well as political leaders such as Nkrumah to designate a non-aligned bloc of countries within the Cold War, a usage that gradually merged with the term Third World in the 60s and 70s.[3]
The term "developing countries" is misleading, as it ignores the fact that the "developed" countries are the ones imperializing them: overexploiting and making them economically dependent on export/imports from or to the global north.[2]
In 1500, the average income in Europe was only three times higher than in Africa and Asia, but that difference grew to ten times by 1960.[4] In addition, in 1960, the richest 20 countries were 18 times as rich as the 20 poorest countries in terms of GDP per capita. This ratio grew to 37 times in 1995.[5]
References
- ↑ IGI Global Publisher Dictionary, "What is Global North/South?"
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 LENIN; Vladimir, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism (Read on Marxists.org)
- ↑ Leslie Wolf-Phillips (1987). Why Third World'?: Origin, definition and usage (pp. 1311-1313). Third World Quarterly, 9:4, 1311-1327. doi: 10.1080/01436598708420027 [HUB]
- ↑ Vijay Prashad (2008). The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World: 'Buenos Aires' (p. 66). [PDF] The New Press. ISBN 9781595583420 [LG]
- ↑ Vijay Prashad (2008). The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World: 'Conclusion' (p. 277). [PDF] The New Press. ISBN 9781595583420 [LG]