Library:Materialism and empirio-criticism: Difference between revisions

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
Tag: Visual edit
No edit summary
Tag: Visual edit
Line 1: Line 1:
== The theory of knowledge of empirio-criticism and of dialectical materialism. I ==
== The theory of knowledge of empirio-criticism and of dialectical materialism ==
=== Sensations and complexes of sensations ===


=== “The discovery of the world-elements” ===
=== Part I ===


=== The principal co-ordination and “naive realism” ===
==== Sensations and complexes of sensations ====


=== Did nature exist prior to man? ===
==== “The discovery of the world-elements” ====


=== Does man think with the help of the brain? ===
==== The principal co-ordination and “naive realism” ====


=== The solipsism of Mach and Avenarius ===
==== Did nature exist prior to man? ====


== The theory of knowledge of empirio-criticism and of dialectical materialism. II ==
==== Does man think with the help of the brain? ====


=== The “thing-in-itself,” or V. Chernov refutes Frederich Engels ===
==== The solipsism of Mach and Avenarius ====


=== “Transcendence,” or Bazarov “revises” Engels ===
=== Part II ===


=== L. Feuerbach and J. Dietzgen on the thing-in-itself ===
==== The “thing-in-itself,” or V. Chernov refutes Frederich Engels ====


=== Does objective truth exist? ===
==== “Transcendence,” or Bazarov “revises” Engels ====


=== Absolute and relative truth, or the eclecticism of Engels as discovered by A. Bogdanov ===
==== L. Feuerbach and J. Dietzgen on the thing-in-itself ====


=== The criterion of practice in the theory of knowledge ===
==== Does objective truth exist? ====


== The theory of knowledge of empirio-criticism and of dialectical materialism. III ==
==== Absolute and relative truth, or the eclecticism of Engels as discovered by A. Bogdanov ====


=== What is matter? What is experience? ===
==== The criterion of practice in the theory of knowledge ====


=== Plekhanov’s error concerning the concept “experience” ===
=== Part III ===


=== Causality and necessity in nature ===
==== What is matter? What is experience? ====


=== The “principle of economy of thought” and the problem of the “unity of the world” ===
==== Plekhanov’s error concerning the concept “experience” ====


=== Space and time ===
==== Causality and necessity in nature ====


=== Freedom and necessity ===
==== The “principle of economy of thought” and the problem of the “unity of the world” ====
 
==== Space and time ====
 
==== Freedom and necessity ====


== The philosophical idealists as comrades-in-arms and successors of empirio-criticism ==
== The philosophical idealists as comrades-in-arms and successors of empirio-criticism ==

Revision as of 19:17, 2 November 2020

The theory of knowledge of empirio-criticism and of dialectical materialism

Part I

Sensations and complexes of sensations

“The discovery of the world-elements”

The principal co-ordination and “naive realism”

Did nature exist prior to man?

Does man think with the help of the brain?

The solipsism of Mach and Avenarius

Part II

The “thing-in-itself,” or V. Chernov refutes Frederich Engels

“Transcendence,” or Bazarov “revises” Engels

L. Feuerbach and J. Dietzgen on the thing-in-itself

Does objective truth exist?

Absolute and relative truth, or the eclecticism of Engels as discovered by A. Bogdanov

The criterion of practice in the theory of knowledge

Part III

What is matter? What is experience?

Plekhanov’s error concerning the concept “experience”

Causality and necessity in nature

The “principle of economy of thought” and the problem of the “unity of the world”

Space and time

Freedom and necessity

The philosophical idealists as comrades-in-arms and successors of empirio-criticism

The criticism of kantianism from the Left and from the Right

How the “empirio-symbolist” Yushkevich ridiculed the “empirio-criticist” Chernov

The immanentists as comrades-in-arms of Mach and Avenarius

Whither is empirio-criticism tending?

A. Bogdanov’s “empirio-monism”

The “theory of symbols” (or hieroglyphs) and the criticism of Helmholtz

Two kinds of criticism of Dühring

How ould J. Dietzgen have found favour with the reactionary philosophers?

The recent revolution in natural science and philosophical idealism

The crisis in modern Physics

“Matter has disappeared”

Is motion without matter conceivable?

The two trends in modern Physics and English spiritualism

The two trends in modern Physics, and German idealism

The two trends in modern Physics and French fideism

A Russian “idealist physicist”

The essence and significance of “physical” idealism

Empirio-criticism and historical materialism

The excursions of the German empirio-criticists into the field of the social sciences

How Bogdanov corrects and “develops” Marx

Suvorov’s “Foundations of Social Philosophy”

Parties in philosophy and philosophical blockheads

Ernst Haeckel and Ernst Mach

Conclusion

Supplement to chapter four, section I