Topic on Comradeship:Amicchan

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia

You were banned for a reason. If you were being unfairly targeted by a small collection of these "jackass" administrators, would other users, or for that matter, administrators, on Lemmygrad punish, or at least note the "bullshit" actions of these administrators which keep banning you for, as you claim, nothing? Furthermore, I do not think that people who have other things to do with their day would spend it reading into your fringe, anti-science voices and screeds which you link. I have seen some of them, and I would wager that they are not rooted in science.

Nor have I said your ideas are false due to them being unsupported. What I was saying was that if you attempt to promote your fringe ideas on this community, I suspect you will be met with a similar treatment on here as with Lemmygrad. Further, I have particularly attempted to gain a consensus among this community regarding Anti-psychiatry, largely on our discord server, and it would appear that at best, only small elements are even close to being Anti-psychiatry, that is, they understand that certain aspects of it are false, and only exist to better Capitalism, but overall think it is helpful and based in science. It would seem the rest do not support your ideas.

Concerning your last statement, I have provided you with around 15 sources for my claims, and sources which indicate that psychiatry is employed in what you would consider Socialist states. I have done more that what is needed to prove my claims.

Lastly, and I do want to make this clear. Stop calling me a "Revisionist". You appear to have no understanding of what that means. It means to make a revision of core tenents of Marxism, not when somebody does not support your favorite Communist Parties, which also happen to deny the existance of class struggle and are made up of "red billionaires". What revision of Marxism am I making with China? What revision am I making with Mao? At best, you are conflating simple disagreement with Revisionism, something which is itself dogmatic.

Thank you. Comrade Wisconcom (talk) 00:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)