Yes. We need more evidence than that to deem FRSO as revisionist.
— Annamarx
So, what would count as "enough" evidence?
Understanding FRSO, FRSO claims to be a revolutionary organisation.
— Annamarx
Claiming to be Marxist does not automatically make them Marxist.
I do not believe FRSO sends out any communist candidates, so it is better to support progressive local politicians.
— Annamarx
"progressive" (liberal) local politicians that don't support even demsocism? Why can't they get off their asses and get communist politicians; like the now-FBI-infiltrated PCUSA ued
Also, where is your proof that Geoffrey Young is an anti-imperialist? The Democratic Party is pro-imperialist. and even if he is, how does that stop him from just turning pro-imperialist after elections?
There was also another person, a former editor of prolewiki, who left the group because they deemed the wiki to be 'useless'. They do not reflect the whole organisation because they are members of one particular group.
— Annamarx
They are one person; but they are still party of the group, so they do influence on the opinion.
And lone actions like these are influenced by the party and their indiciative of the party's real theory. Publishing a news article endorsing a democrat politician as if they are going to support the working class; given that they are implementing democratic centralism is a very conscious action.
---
Also, no one tried to defend the PCUSA article when I edited it to state that they defended Patriotic Socialism and that they are therefore revisionist. Why do this for this particular article?