More languages
More actions
(stub) |
mNo edit summary Tag: Visual edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Communism is a proposed mode of economic production based on the premise "From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." | Communism is a proposed mode of economic production based on the premise "From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." | ||
In the first volume of Capital, Marx refers it as ''"an association of free men, working with the means of production held in common, and expending their many different forms of labour-power in full self-awareness as one single social labour force"''<ref>''"Let us finally imagine, for a change, '''an association of free men, working with the means of production held in common, and expending their many different forms of labour-power in full self-awareness as one single social labour force'''. All the characteristics of Robinson’s labour are repeated here, but with the difference that they are social instead of individual. All Robinson’s products were exclusively the result of his own personal labour and they were therefore directly objects of utility for him personally. The total product of our imagined association is a social product. One part of this product serves as fresh means of production and remains social. But another part is consumed by the members of the association as means of subsistence. This part must therefore be divided amongst them. The way this division is made will vary with the particular kind of social organization of production and the corresponding level of social development attained by the producers. We shall assume, but only for the sake of a parallel with the production of commodities, that the share of each individual producer in the means of subsistence is determined by his labour-time. Labour-time would in that case play a double part. Its apportionment in accordance with a definite social plan maintains the correct proportion between the different functions of labour and the various needs of the associations. On the other hand, labour-time also serves as a measure of the part taken by each individual in the common labour, and of his share in the part of the total product destined for individual consumption. The social relations of the individual producers, both towards their labour and the products of their labour, are here transparent in their simplicity, in production as well as in distribution."'' | |||
Found in the first chapter of the [[Capital, Vol. I|first volume of Capital]], "[[Capital, Vol. I#The fetishism of the commodity and its secret|The fetishism of the commodity and its secret]]".</ref> | |||
Revision as of 07:49, 31 October 2020
Communism is a proposed mode of economic production based on the premise "From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs."
In the first volume of Capital, Marx refers it as "an association of free men, working with the means of production held in common, and expending their many different forms of labour-power in full self-awareness as one single social labour force"[1]
- ↑ "Let us finally imagine, for a change, an association of free men, working with the means of production held in common, and expending their many different forms of labour-power in full self-awareness as one single social labour force. All the characteristics of Robinson’s labour are repeated here, but with the difference that they are social instead of individual. All Robinson’s products were exclusively the result of his own personal labour and they were therefore directly objects of utility for him personally. The total product of our imagined association is a social product. One part of this product serves as fresh means of production and remains social. But another part is consumed by the members of the association as means of subsistence. This part must therefore be divided amongst them. The way this division is made will vary with the particular kind of social organization of production and the corresponding level of social development attained by the producers. We shall assume, but only for the sake of a parallel with the production of commodities, that the share of each individual producer in the means of subsistence is determined by his labour-time. Labour-time would in that case play a double part. Its apportionment in accordance with a definite social plan maintains the correct proportion between the different functions of labour and the various needs of the associations. On the other hand, labour-time also serves as a measure of the part taken by each individual in the common labour, and of his share in the part of the total product destined for individual consumption. The social relations of the individual producers, both towards their labour and the products of their labour, are here transparent in their simplicity, in production as well as in distribution." Found in the first chapter of the first volume of Capital, "The fetishism of the commodity and its secret".