More languages
More actions
420dengist (talk | contribs) (added a lenin quote) Tag: Visual edit |
420dengist (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: Visual edit |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
In the context of Marxist [[historical materialism]], as [[serfdom]] and the [[Simple commodity production|small commodity production]] of artisans and craftsmen in feudal times was increasingly superseded by the emerging merchant class, increasing [[productive forces]] allowed for a change in property relations that led to the displacement of the [[feudal]] [[aristocracy]] as the dominant economic class in favor of the [[bourgeoisie]]. This occurred by means of several [[bourgeois revolutions]]. In this context, historical materialism considers capitalism to be a progressive development compared to feudalism;{{Quote|The progressive historical role of capitalism may be summed up in two brief propositions: increase in the productive forces of social labour, and the socialisation of that labour.|Lenin|The Development of Capitalism in Russia {{Refn| | In the context of Marxist [[historical materialism]], as [[serfdom]] and the [[Simple commodity production|small commodity production]] of artisans and craftsmen in feudal times was increasingly superseded by the emerging merchant class, increasing [[productive forces]] allowed for a change in property relations that led to the displacement of the [[feudal]] [[aristocracy]] as the dominant economic class in favor of the [[bourgeoisie]]. This occurred by means of several [[bourgeois revolutions]]. In this context, historical materialism considers capitalism to be a progressive development compared to feudalism;{{Quote|The progressive historical role of capitalism may be summed up in two brief propositions: increase in the productive forces of social labour, and the socialisation of that labour.|Lenin|The Development of Capitalism in Russia {{Refn|Lenin. [[Library:The Development of Capitalism in Russia|''The Development of Capitalism in Russia'']]: [[Library:The Development of Capitalism in Russia#The Mission of Capitalism|''The Mission of Capitalism'']]|name=|group=note}}}} | ||
== Contradictions == | == Contradictions == | ||
The fundamental contradiction of capitalism is that between the social character of production and the private capitalist form of appropriating the product of labor. <ref group="note">Workers in commodity-producing industries provide their labor as a collective force, and that is the social character of production. The bourgeoisie privately expropriate the product of collective labor.</ref> This contradiction expresses the profound antagonism between wage labor and capital, between the developing productive forces and the capitalist relations of production which shackle them. As the modern productive forces, based on large mechanized industry, develop, production becomes more and more concentrated, the social division of labor progresses, leading to a widening and intensification of the economic links between the various enterprises and branches of the economy. | The fundamental contradiction of capitalism is that between the social character of production and the private capitalist form of appropriating the product of labor. <ref group="note">Workers in commodity-producing industries provide their labor as a collective force, and that is the social character of production. The bourgeoisie privately expropriate the product of collective labor.</ref> This contradiction expresses the profound antagonism between wage labor and capital, between the developing productive forces and the capitalist relations of production which shackle them. As the modern productive forces, based on large mechanized industry, develop, production becomes more and more concentrated, the social division of labor progresses, leading to a widening and intensification of the economic links between the various enterprises and branches of the economy. |
Revision as of 10:55, 3 February 2021
Capitalism is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production, exploitation of the working class through means of wage slavery and private expropriation of socially produced wealth.
Definition
The definition of capitalism in the context of scientific socialism is different from the one used by its adherents themselves. Liberals and pro-capitalist ideologues define capitalism a combination of free market systems, private property, free competition and voluntary exchange.[1] This and similar definitions carry limitations that prevents capitalist adherents from analyzing capitalism in a holistic manner, including the lengths taken by the bourgeoisie to preserve and perpetuate the system and their profits, leading to denial of atrocities like the Bengal Famine or the Pinochet regime as 'not real capitalism'.
History
In the context of Marxist historical materialism, as serfdom and the small commodity production of artisans and craftsmen in feudal times was increasingly superseded by the emerging merchant class, increasing productive forces allowed for a change in property relations that led to the displacement of the feudal aristocracy as the dominant economic class in favor of the bourgeoisie. This occurred by means of several bourgeois revolutions. In this context, historical materialism considers capitalism to be a progressive development compared to feudalism;
The progressive historical role of capitalism may be summed up in two brief propositions: increase in the productive forces of social labour, and the socialisation of that labour.
— Lenin, The Development of Capitalism in Russia [note 1]
Contradictions
The fundamental contradiction of capitalism is that between the social character of production and the private capitalist form of appropriating the product of labor. [note 2] This contradiction expresses the profound antagonism between wage labor and capital, between the developing productive forces and the capitalist relations of production which shackle them. As the modern productive forces, based on large mechanized industry, develop, production becomes more and more concentrated, the social division of labor progresses, leading to a widening and intensification of the economic links between the various enterprises and branches of the economy.
During the production of each commodity, there is, directly or indirectly, participation of enterprises of different branches of production and hundreds of thousands to millions of workers, grouped in the capitalist enterprises. The process of production and work, through the development of productive forces is increasingly socialized. However, both production and its results do not belong to those who are really its creators — the workers — but to private persons, to the capitalists, who use the social wealth for profit, and not in the interest of society as a whole.
Governments under capitalism
Under capitalism, the law is placed firmly "in the service of capital."[2] As Professor of Comparative Law at Columbia Law School Katharina Pistor further elucidates: "Through its courts, bailiffs, and police forces, states enforce not only their own commands, but also private property rights and the binding commitments private parties make to one another. This does not mean that state power is omnipresent. As long as the threat of coercive law enforcement is sufficiently credible, voluntary compliance can be achieved without mobilizing it in every case."[3]
References
Notes
- ↑ Lenin. The Development of Capitalism in Russia: The Mission of Capitalism
- ↑ Workers in commodity-producing industries provide their labor as a collective force, and that is the social character of production. The bourgeoisie privately expropriate the product of collective labor.
Citations
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism#Characteristics (Retrieved 25 December 2020)
- ↑ Pistor 2019, p. xi
- ↑ Pistor 2019, pp. 17 - 18
Bibliography
Print sources
- Pistor, Katharina (2019). The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691189439.