Comrade:Amicchan: Difference between revisions

1,330 editsJoined 10 June 2022
(Opinion on linguistics.)
(Removed misuse of the term intelligensia and hyperlink some words,)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm a pro-science [[marxist]] in the [[Intelligentsia]] who supports socialist psychiatry to solely oppress the bourgeoisie; and [[antipsychiatry]] otherwise.
I'm a pro-science [[Marxism|marxist]] who supports socialist psychiatry to solely oppress the bourgeoisie; and [[antipsychiatry]] otherwise.


:I view Psychiatry as a psuedoscientific tool of oppression disguised as medicinal aid where the drug industry extracts wealth directly from the proletariat and lumpenproletariat and abuses them. Psychiatry can be used by the proletariat to suppress the bourgeoisie, hence my (critical) support for Psychiatry in socialist countries.
:I view Psychiatry as a psuedoscientific tool of oppression disguised as medicinal aid where the drug industry extracts wealth directly from the oppressed class or underclass. Psychiatry can be used by the proletariat to suppress the bourgeoisie, hence my (critical) support for Psychiatry in socialist countries.


==Positions==
==Positions==
Line 7: Line 7:
===Lingustics===
===Lingustics===


I support <abbr title='International Auxiliary Language'>IAL</abbr>s, mostly [[Esperanto]], as a counter-push against linguistic imperialism and to aid global communication between humans, which is particularly important given the development of hyperconnectivity and internetworks. Esperanto is an excellent language suited for being an IAL; it is not perfect (male-default grammar exists and some root words end with the same letters as suffixes); but it is better than English, and a ''perfect'' IAL is impossible anyway.
I support <abbr title='International Auxiliary Language'>IAL</abbr>s, mostly [[Esperanto]], as a counter-push against linguistic [[imperialism]] and to aid global communication between humans, which is particularly important given the development of hyperconnectivity and internetworks. Esperanto is an excellent language suited for being an IAL; it is not perfect (male-default grammar exists and some root words end with the same letters as suffixes); but it is better than English, and a ''perfect'' IAL is impossible anyway.


However, I do ''not'' support Zamenhof's idealism of an international language being the sole bringer of world peace; class warfare would still exist despite a monolingual humanity, hence making world peace impossible.
However, I do ''not'' support Zamenhof's idealism of an international language being the sole bringer of world peace; class warfare would still exist despite a monolingual humanity, hence making world peace impossible.


I do not approve English as an international language; it mostly spread through colonialism<ref>{{Web citation|url=https://brownpoliticalreview.org/2017/04/linguistic-colonialism-english/|title=The Linguistic Colonialism of English|author=Anna Corradi|date=April 25, 2017}}</ref> and it is still imposed on other countries today in computer science (through U.S dominance of the computer industry); and catered to one demography: Anglos.
I do not approve English as an international language; it mostly spread through [[colonialism]]<ref>{{Web citation|url=https://brownpoliticalreview.org/2017/04/linguistic-colonialism-english/|title=The Linguistic Colonialism of English|author=Anna Corradi|date=April 25, 2017}}</ref> and it is still imposed on other countries today in computer science (through U.S dominance of the computer industry); and catered to one demography: Anglos.


===Social Media===
===Social Media===

Revision as of 05:26, 6 December 2022

I'm a pro-science marxist who supports socialist psychiatry to solely oppress the bourgeoisie; and antipsychiatry otherwise.

I view Psychiatry as a psuedoscientific tool of oppression disguised as medicinal aid where the drug industry extracts wealth directly from the oppressed class or underclass. Psychiatry can be used by the proletariat to suppress the bourgeoisie, hence my (critical) support for Psychiatry in socialist countries.

Positions

Lingustics

I support IALs, mostly Esperanto, as a counter-push against linguistic imperialism and to aid global communication between humans, which is particularly important given the development of hyperconnectivity and internetworks. Esperanto is an excellent language suited for being an IAL; it is not perfect (male-default grammar exists and some root words end with the same letters as suffixes); but it is better than English, and a perfect IAL is impossible anyway.

However, I do not support Zamenhof's idealism of an international language being the sole bringer of world peace; class warfare would still exist despite a monolingual humanity, hence making world peace impossible.

I do not approve English as an international language; it mostly spread through colonialism[1] and it is still imposed on other countries today in computer science (through U.S dominance of the computer industry); and catered to one demography: Anglos.

Social Media

  1. Anna Corradi (April 25, 2017). "The Linguistic Colonialism of English"