Contradiction: Difference between revisions

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
(linked to DM)
Tag: Visual edit
(clarified a paragraph that didn't make any sense and expanded on primary and secondary contradictions)
Tag: Visual edit
Line 4: Line 4:
# And one cannot exist without the other
# And one cannot exist without the other


For example: in warfare, attack and defence form a contradiction; defence is the opposite of the attack and is only present when an attack is present (rule 1) and secondly, there is no need for defence if there is no attack (rule 2).   
For example: in warfare, attack and defence form a contradiction; defence is the diametrical opposite of the attack (rule 1) and there is no need for defence if there is no attack (rule 2).   


Note that diametrically opposed does not necessarily mean the literal opposite. The bourgeoisie and proletariat are in contradiction: one cannot exist without the other, and their class interests are diametrically opposed (the bourgeoisie wants to exploit the proletariat, and the proletariat wants to destroy the bourgeoisie as a class so as to liberate themselves).
Note that ''diametrically'' opposed does not necessarily mean the literal opposite. Diametrical means the ''complete'' opposite, at both extremes. The [[bourgeoisie]] and [[proletariat]] are diametrically opposed (both existing at one extreme end: the bourgeoisie that controls industry and the proletariat that must work this industry), but they are not an antonym to one another.


Contradictions exist everywhere in the world and in many different domains, and it is the solving of contradictions (or the apparition of new ones) that drive change in the general sense of the term, thus [[dialectics]] happen.
Contradictions exist everywhere in the world and in many different domains, and it is the solving of contradictions (which makes new ones appear) that drive change in the general sense of the term, thus [[dialectics]] happen.


Chairman [[Mao Zedong]] talked at length about contradictions and is a good starting place for theory.
[[Mao Zedong]] talked at length about contradictions and is a good starting place for theory.


== Primary and secondary contradictions ==
== Primary and secondary contradictions ==
Contradictions are separated into primary and secondary categories. Secondary contradictions are dependent on primary ones, and solving the primary contradiction solves the secondary contradiction.
Contradictions are separated into primary and secondary categories. Secondary contradictions are dependent on primary ones for their existence or rather, primary contradictions drive secondary contradictions.


Some think, for example, that solving class contradictions (moving into communism, a classless society) will also solve several secondary contradictions attached such as: racism, homophobia, sexism, selfishness, etc. This is an example of primary and secondary contradictions. For others, it is impossible to solve secondary contradictions without addressing the primary contradiction.
Whether one should solve the primary or secondary contradiction first is still a point of debate.
 
Some think that solving class contradictions for example (moving into communism, a classless society) will also inherently solve several secondary contradictions attached such as racism, homophobia, sexism, selfishness, etc.
 
For others, it is impossible to solve the primary contradiction without addressing the secondary contradictions. They argue it is simply impossible, for example, to solve class contradictions if sexism and homophobia are not addressed first.


== Solving contradictions ==
== Solving contradictions ==
Line 28: Line 32:


== Further Reading ==
== Further Reading ==
 
Mao Zedong : [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_17.htm ''On Contradiction'']
[https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_17.htm Mao Zedong ''On Contradiction'']

Revision as of 17:29, 5 September 2022

In dialectical materialism, a contradiction is formed when two requirements are met:

  1. Two things must be diametrically opposed
  2. And one cannot exist without the other

For example: in warfare, attack and defence form a contradiction; defence is the diametrical opposite of the attack (rule 1) and there is no need for defence if there is no attack (rule 2).

Note that diametrically opposed does not necessarily mean the literal opposite. Diametrical means the complete opposite, at both extremes. The bourgeoisie and proletariat are diametrically opposed (both existing at one extreme end: the bourgeoisie that controls industry and the proletariat that must work this industry), but they are not an antonym to one another.

Contradictions exist everywhere in the world and in many different domains, and it is the solving of contradictions (which makes new ones appear) that drive change in the general sense of the term, thus dialectics happen.

Mao Zedong talked at length about contradictions and is a good starting place for theory.

Primary and secondary contradictions

Contradictions are separated into primary and secondary categories. Secondary contradictions are dependent on primary ones for their existence or rather, primary contradictions drive secondary contradictions.

Whether one should solve the primary or secondary contradiction first is still a point of debate.

Some think that solving class contradictions for example (moving into communism, a classless society) will also inherently solve several secondary contradictions attached such as racism, homophobia, sexism, selfishness, etc.

For others, it is impossible to solve the primary contradiction without addressing the secondary contradictions. They argue it is simply impossible, for example, to solve class contradictions if sexism and homophobia are not addressed first.

Solving contradictions

A contradiction is solved when it stops existing; i.e. when both rules stop being applicable.

Thus the proletariat will stop existing as a class when the bourgeoisie stops existing. However, in that scenario, one of two things may happen:

  1. Another contradiction takes its place
  2. The contradiction is solved for good

In this example, it means that the proletariat may be replaced by another class -- but inevitably, so will the bourgeoisie (much like how serfs and nobles were replaced by capitalist social classes). Thus another contradiction would take place between these two classes. Or classes could stop existing at all, which would usher in a classless era and solve class contradictions for good (since there are no more classes).

Further Reading

Mao Zedong : On Contradiction