More languages
More actions
(Created page with "'''Historical revisionism''' is the phenomenon in which one revisits, reexamines, and attempts to revise the established or commonly-held view of historical events. This can be helpful to the study of history when the conclusions reached are fact-based and follow the scientific method; or harmful when they rely on incorrect, selective, or manipulated data. The label 'historical revisionist', much like 'conspiracy theorist', is often used by people...") Tag: Visual edit |
No edit summary Tag: Visual edit |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Historical revisionism''' is the | '''Historical revisionism''' is the process in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established, commonly-held view of a [[Human history|historical event]]. This can be good for the field when the conclusions reached are supported by the evidence as it leads to a more accurate understanding of the past; or bad when it relies on incorrect, selective, or manipulated data. | ||
The label 'historical revisionist', much like '[[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theorist]]', is often used | The label 'historical revisionist', much like '[[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theorist]]', is often used to dismiss heterodox perspectives without actually examining the evidence for and engaging with them. | ||
One modern example of historical revisionism is the way the [[Tibet Autonomous Region#Ancient history|history of Tibet]] is taught in many Western [[Capitalism|capitalist]] countries. Tibet has been part of [[People's Republic of China|China]] since the [[Tang dynasty (618–907)|Tang dynasty]], over a thousand years ago, yet many [[Bourgeois science|Western history textbooks]] argue that Tibet was a distinct entity from China that was only forced to join China in 1950 [[Peaceful Liberation of Tibet|after a supposed "invasion"]]. [[Bourgeoisie|Bourgeois]] historians also glorify the [[Feudalism|feudal]] era of Tibetan history when over 90% of the population were either [[Slavery|slaves]] or serfs and living conditions were deplorable for most people.<ref name=":3">{{News citation|newspaper=[[Liberation School]]|title=China, Tibet and U.S.-sponsored counterrevolution|date=2008-04-01|url=https://www.liberationschool.org/08-04-01-china-tibet-ussponsored-coun-html/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210619132116/https://liberationschool.org/08-04-01-china-tibet-ussponsored-coun-html/|archive-date=2021-06-19|retrieved=2022-06-20}}</ref> This gross mischaracterisation of Tibet's history is made by bourgeois propagandists in an attempt to lend legitimacy to separatist movements in China, which want to [[Balkanization|balkanize]] the modern Chinese [[nation-state]]. | |||
== References == | |||
[[Category:History]] | |||
Latest revision as of 08:07, 22 November 2024
Historical revisionism is the process in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established, commonly-held view of a historical event. This can be good for the field when the conclusions reached are supported by the evidence as it leads to a more accurate understanding of the past; or bad when it relies on incorrect, selective, or manipulated data.
The label 'historical revisionist', much like 'conspiracy theorist', is often used to dismiss heterodox perspectives without actually examining the evidence for and engaging with them.
One modern example of historical revisionism is the way the history of Tibet is taught in many Western capitalist countries. Tibet has been part of China since the Tang dynasty, over a thousand years ago, yet many Western history textbooks argue that Tibet was a distinct entity from China that was only forced to join China in 1950 after a supposed "invasion". Bourgeois historians also glorify the feudal era of Tibetan history when over 90% of the population were either slaves or serfs and living conditions were deplorable for most people.[1] This gross mischaracterisation of Tibet's history is made by bourgeois propagandists in an attempt to lend legitimacy to separatist movements in China, which want to balkanize the modern Chinese nation-state.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ "China, Tibet and U.S.-sponsored counterrevolution" (2008-04-01). Liberation School. Archived from the original on 2021-06-19. Retrieved 2022-06-20.