Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Relations of production: Difference between revisions

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
More languages
(Created page with "Production is not possible without relations of production – humans cannot produce outside of a social structure, whether a nation or a family – relations of production ex...")
 
(Wasn't sure if this needed references but put it here just in case as it doesn't have any)
Tag: Visual edit
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Production is not possible without relations of production – humans cannot produce outside of a social structure, whether a nation or a family – relations of production exist for all producers. The basis of the relations of production is ownership of the means of production. When the means of production become public property, then all people are able to exercise their freedom in relation to the productive forces through the social and political structures of society. To the extent that people enjoy equal rights they are thus able exercise these rights freely in the real development of society, unhindered by the barriers of private property. With the existance of private property, competition and exploitation hinder the real freedom of humans, where only a handful have ownership of the means of production. Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.
'''Relations of production''' is a concept frequently used by [[Marx|Karl Marx]] and [[Engels|Friedrich Engels]] in their theory of [[historical materialism]] and in ''[[Library:Capital, vol. I|Das Kapital]]''. to refer to the sum total of social relationships that people ''must'' enter into in order to survive, to produce, and to reproduce their means of life. As people ''must'' enter into these social relationships, i.e. because participation in them is not voluntary, the totality of these relationships constitute a relatively stable and permanent ''structure'', the "economic structure" or [[mode of production]].
 
Some social relations are voluntary and freely chosen (a person chooses to associate with another person or a group). But other social relations are involuntary, i.e. people can be socially related, whether they like that or not, because they are part of a family, a group, an organization, a community, a nation etc.
 
Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe ([[primitive communism]]), public or state property ([[socialism]]), cooperative and community property ([[communism]]), etc. while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.
[[Category:Marxist terminology]]
[[Category:Marxist theory]]
[[Category:Pages needing references]]

Latest revision as of 13:31, 25 May 2024

Relations of production is a concept frequently used by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in their theory of historical materialism and in Das Kapital. to refer to the sum total of social relationships that people must enter into in order to survive, to produce, and to reproduce their means of life. As people must enter into these social relationships, i.e. because participation in them is not voluntary, the totality of these relationships constitute a relatively stable and permanent structure, the "economic structure" or mode of production.

Some social relations are voluntary and freely chosen (a person chooses to associate with another person or a group). But other social relations are involuntary, i.e. people can be socially related, whether they like that or not, because they are part of a family, a group, an organization, a community, a nation etc.

Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. — while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.