More languages
More actions
Jucheguevara (talk | contribs) (added info about corporate media) Tag: Visual edit |
Jucheguevara (talk | contribs) (added unsourced section) Tag: Visual edit |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Given the shared ownership, the [[corporate media]] loyally serves the political interests of the corporate duopoly. This is evident by the demonization of those who challenge the status quo; ranging from communists, socialists, left-liberals like [[Bernie Sanders]], and even free-market libertarians like Ron Paul whose anti-war positions threaten the war profiteers. | Given the shared ownership, the [[corporate media]] loyally serves the political interests of the corporate duopoly. This is evident by the demonization of those who challenge the status quo; ranging from communists, socialists, left-liberals like [[Bernie Sanders]], and even free-market libertarians like Ron Paul whose anti-war positions threaten the war profiteers. | ||
== Methods for defeat == | |||
=== Elections === | |||
While elections under capitalism are usually unable to produce meaningful change, the ballot box can still be used as a method of educating and agitating the workers to become political. | |||
As for enhancing the democratic power of voters to fight against the power of capital within bourgeois parliaments, the following policies can help strengthen popular will: | |||
* [[Ranked-choice voting]] as opposed to first-past-the-post voting | |||
* [[Publicly-funded elections]] as opposed to privately funded elections which often rely on corporate donations | |||
=== Extra-electoral means === | |||
The construction of alternative forms of political power is necessary when bourgeois elections do not allow for the popular will to be implemented in society. Such alternative forms can be described as [[dual power]]. These are similar to [[Soviet (governmental body)|Soviets]] (which translates to "council) in the [[USSR]], [[Basij]] councils in [[Islamic Republic of Iran|Iran]], etc. | |||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 18:35, 13 June 2022
Corporate duopoly is a phrase used to describe the political situation in the modern United States, where the two ruling parties both serve the same corporate interests.[1][2] These parties are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. They exist to provide a false sense of "competition" during election seasons.
The "first past the post" electoral system makes it difficult for third parties to compete for political power. In other bourgeois dictatorships (so-called "liberal democracies") such as those in Europe, there are far more political parties represented in parliaments and congresses.
Given the shared ownership, the corporate media loyally serves the political interests of the corporate duopoly. This is evident by the demonization of those who challenge the status quo; ranging from communists, socialists, left-liberals like Bernie Sanders, and even free-market libertarians like Ron Paul whose anti-war positions threaten the war profiteers.
Methods for defeat
Elections
While elections under capitalism are usually unable to produce meaningful change, the ballot box can still be used as a method of educating and agitating the workers to become political.
As for enhancing the democratic power of voters to fight against the power of capital within bourgeois parliaments, the following policies can help strengthen popular will:
- Ranked-choice voting as opposed to first-past-the-post voting
- Publicly-funded elections as opposed to privately funded elections which often rely on corporate donations
Extra-electoral means
The construction of alternative forms of political power is necessary when bourgeois elections do not allow for the popular will to be implemented in society. Such alternative forms can be described as dual power. These are similar to Soviets (which translates to "council) in the USSR, Basij councils in Iran, etc.
References
- ↑ Glen Ford (2020-10-01). "Corporate Duopoly Wins Again" LA Progressive.
- ↑ "AMERICA’S TWO PARTY CORPORATE DUOPOLY". Second Thought.