m (debug edit) Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
No edit summary Tag: Visual edit |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Historical revisionism''' is a phenomenon in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established or commonly-held view of historical events. This can be | '''Historical revisionism''' is a phenomenon in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established or commonly-held view of [[Human history|historical events]]. This can be good for the historical record when the conclusions reached are fact-based and supported by the evidence; or bad when it relies on incorrect, selective, or manipulated data. | ||
The label 'historical revisionist', much like '[[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theorist]]', is often used by | The label 'historical revisionist', much like '[[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theorist]]', is often used by [[Liberalism|liberals]] and [[Imperialism|imperialists]] to dismiss different perspectives without examining the evidence for them. | ||
One modern example of historical revisionism is the way certain [[Capitalism|capitalist]] countries teach the [[Tibet Autonomous Region#Ancient history|history of Tibet]]. Tibet has been part of [[People's Republic of China|China]] since the [[Tang dynasty (618–907)|Tang dynasty]], over a thousand years ago, yet [[Bourgeois science|Western history textbooks]] imply that Tibet was only forced to join China in 1950 after [[Peaceful Liberation of Tibet|a supposed 'invasion']]. [[Bourgeoisie|Bourgeois]] historians also glorify the [[Feudalism|feudal]] era of Tibetan history when over 90% of the population were [[Slavery|slaves]] or unfree serfs<ref name=":3">{{News citation|newspaper=[[Liberation School]]|title=China, Tibet and U.S.-sponsored counterrevolution|date=2008-04-01|url=https://www.liberationschool.org/08-04-01-china-tibet-ussponsored-coun-html/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210619132116/https://liberationschool.org/08-04-01-china-tibet-ussponsored-coun-html/|archive-date=2021-06-19|retrieved=2022-06-20}}</ref> and living conditions were deplorable for most people. This gross mischaracterisation of Tibet's history is made by bourgeois propagandists in an attempt to lend legitimacy to separatist movements in China, which want to [[Balkanization|balkanize]] the modern Chinese [[nation-state]]. | |||
== References == | |||
Latest revision as of 22:59, 26 August 2023
Historical revisionism is a phenomenon in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established or commonly-held view of historical events. This can be good for the historical record when the conclusions reached are fact-based and supported by the evidence; or bad when it relies on incorrect, selective, or manipulated data.
The label 'historical revisionist', much like 'conspiracy theorist', is often used by liberals and imperialists to dismiss different perspectives without examining the evidence for them.
One modern example of historical revisionism is the way certain capitalist countries teach the history of Tibet. Tibet has been part of China since the Tang dynasty, over a thousand years ago, yet Western history textbooks imply that Tibet was only forced to join China in 1950 after a supposed 'invasion'. Bourgeois historians also glorify the feudal era of Tibetan history when over 90% of the population were slaves or unfree serfs[1] and living conditions were deplorable for most people. This gross mischaracterisation of Tibet's history is made by bourgeois propagandists in an attempt to lend legitimacy to separatist movements in China, which want to balkanize the modern Chinese nation-state.
References
- ↑ "China, Tibet and U.S.-sponsored counterrevolution" (2008-04-01). Liberation School. Archived from the original on 2021-06-19. Retrieved 2022-06-20.