More languages
More actions
Geist (German: spirit/mind), along with related concepts of Spirit and the Ideal, represents a cluster of categories central to idealist philosophy, particularly German idealism. From a Marxist-Leninist perspective, these concepts constitute sophisticated mystifications of material reality, hypostatizing products of human consciousness into independent forces that supposedly govern history and nature.
Hegel's conception[edit | edit source]
In Hegel's system, Geist denotes the self-developing rational principle underlying all reality. It encompasses individual consciousness (subjective Geist), collective cultural formations (objective Geist i.e. law, morality, social institutions), and finally absolute Geist (art, religion, philosophy), where Spirit achieves full self-comprehension. There is also the Volkgeist (national spirit) and Zeitgeist (spirit of the age) which demonstrate the fundamental tension of the Hegelian system, transcendental in being, historically conditioned in realization. History becomes Geist's autobiography: the unfolding dialectical process through which Spirit externalizes itself in nature, alienates itself in finite forms, then returns to itself with enriched self-knowledge with the final telos being Absolute Knowing.
This represents objective idealism's most elaborate articulation. Hegel correctly recognized that history develops dialectically through contradiction, that thought and reality share logical structure, that consciousness is not static but develops. His fatal error was making this development the self-movement of Spirit rather than recognizing consciousness as reflection of material processes.
Materialist inversion[edit | edit source]
Marx's fundamental breakthrough involved inverting Hegel's system. Where Hegel saw material conditions as externalized Spirit, Marx recognized "Spirit" as ideological reflection of actual material relations. The "cunning of reason" that Hegel claimed guides history is actually the blind operation of class struggle and productive development. Ideas that appear as autonomous Geist are produced by humans in definite social relations.
As Marx wrote in the 1844 manuscripts:
"He [Hegel] grasps labor as the essence of man, as man’s essence which stands the test: he sees only the positive, not the negative side of labour. Labour is man’s coming-to-be for himself within alienation, or as alienated man. The only labour which Hegel knows and recognises is abstractly mental labour." [1]
However for Hegel this is only abstract mental labor i.e. Spirit laboring upon itself. Real transformative labor, i.e. human beings materially transforming nature through social production, gets mystified into Geist's self-development. The inversion is complete: actual human activity becomes mere moment in Geist's journey.
Ideal[edit | edit source]
The category of the Ideal represents another mystification. In Platonic and Hegelian systems, the Ideal denotes perfect forms or concepts toward which material reality strives. This again inverts causality: actual human ideals (justice, beauty, freedom) arise from material social practice and reflect historically specific conditions and aspirations. Bourgeois philosophy hypostatizes these mental abstractions into autonomous entities.
Ilyenkov's dialectical materialist analysis demonstrates that "the ideal" is not a special spiritual substance but rather the form of social relations reflected in consciousness. The ideal exists objectively, not as Platonic Form, but as crystallized social practice embodied in language, tools, institutions. Money's "ideal" value expresses real social relations of commodity exchange, not transcendent essence.[2]
Geist demystified[edit | edit source]
From a Marxist-Leninist standpoint, Geist/Spirit/Ideal represents sophisticated mystification serving definite class interests. By making consciousness primary and material conditions derivative, these concepts:
- Obscure actual causes of social development (class struggle, productive forces).
- Naturalize existing order as necessary moment in Spirit's unfolding.
- Divert revolutionary energy toward spiritual transformation rather than material struggle.
The task is not simply rejecting these concepts but understanding their material basis: they reflect real features of social existence (collective consciousness, historical development, ideals) while inverting causal relations. Dialectical materialism preserves genuine insights, society does develop, consciousness does matter, ideas have consequences, while restoring correct materialist foundations. Consciousness reflects material being; ideas arise from practice; Spirit is mystified reflection of real human social activity.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ “He [Hegel] grasps labour as the essence of man – as man’s essence which stands the test: he sees only the positive, not the negative side of labour. Labour is man’s coming-to-be for himself within alienation, or as alienated man. The only labour which Hegel knows and recognises is abstractly mental labour.”
Karl Marx (1844). [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/hegel.htm "Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy in General"] Marxists.org.
- ↑ “The ideal form is the form of a thing created by social human labour. Or, conversely, the form of labour realised in the substance of nature, 'embodied' in it, 'alienated' in it, 'realised' in it and, therefore, presenting itself to man the creator as the form of a thing or a relationship between things in which man, his labour, has placed them.”
Evald Ilyenkov (1977). [https://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/ideal/ideal.htm "Problems of Dialectical MaterialismThe Concept of the Ideal"] Marxists.org.