Peasantry: Difference between revisions

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
m (Added references)
Tag: Visual edit
No edit summary
Tag: Visual edit
Line 1: Line 1:
The peasantry (Individual is labelled as peasant) are a [[social class]] created from the [[Feudalism|feudal]] [[mode of production]]. While the peasant performs labour on the land the same way a serf does, the peasant owns that land as well. As the peasantry are a creation of feudalism, the peasantry is decaying into either the bourgeoisie or the proletariat, as the productive forces advance on the specific countries. Their characteristic is petit bourgeois, however they usually do not have an antagonistic contradiction with the proletariat.
The '''peasantry''' (individual is labelled as a '''peasant''') are a [[social class]] created from the [[Feudalism|feudal]] [[mode of production]]. While the peasant performs labour on the land the same way a [[serf]] does, the peasant owns that land as well. As the peasantry are a creation of feudalism, the peasantry is decaying into either the [[bourgeoisie]] or the [[proletariat]], as the productive forces advance on the specific countries. Their characteristic is [[Petty bourgeoisie|petit bourgeois]], but they usually do not have an antagonistic [[contradiction]] with the proletariat.


The peasantry are used in many revolutions in underdeveloped nations, the most famous ones being the [[Russian revolution of 1917|October Revolution]] and the [[Chinese Civil War]], as there is often more of a majority of peasants rather than proletarians.
The peasantry are used in many revolutions in underdeveloped nations, the most famous ones being the [[Russian revolution of 1917|October Revolution]] and the [[Chinese Civil War]], as there is often more of a majority of peasants rather than proletarians.


== Characteristics of the Peasantry ==
== Characteristics of the peasantry ==


=== Petit-Bourgeois ===
=== Class character ===
Peasants are petit-bourgeois<ref>{{Citation|author=Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels|year=1848|title=The Manifesto of the Communist Party|title-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/|chapter=Bourgeois and Proletarians|chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007|quote=The lower middle class, the small manufacturer, the shopkeeper, the artisan, the peasant, all these fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class.}}</ref> as they work the land and perform the labour on that land as well. The land constitutes part of the means of production, especially because it is a relic of the feudal era.
Peasants are petit-bourgeois<ref>{{Citation|author=Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels|year=1848|title=The Manifesto of the Communist Party|title-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/|chapter=Bourgeois and Proletarians|chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007|quote=The lower middle class, the small manufacturer, the shopkeeper, the artisan, the peasant, all these fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class.}}</ref> as they work the land and perform the labour on that land as well. The land constitutes part of the means of production, especially because it is a relic of the feudal era.


=== Not Truly Revolutionary ===
=== Role in revolution ===
The Proletariat are deemed to be the truly revolutionary class, which can overthrow the bourgeoisie.<ref>{{Citation|author=Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels|year=1848|title=The Manifesto of the Communist Party|title-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/|chapter=Bourgeois and Proletarians|chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007|quote=Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product.}}</ref> As the peasantry decay into either the bourgeoisie or the proletariat, the Communist Manifesto states that they are only fighting their own survival as a class.<ref>{{Citation|author=Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels|year=1848|title=The Manifesto of the Communist Party|title-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/|chapter=Bourgeois and Proletarians|chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007|quote=[T]he peasant[ry], [They] fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class. They are therefore not revolutionary, but conservative. Nay more, they are reactionary, for they try to roll back the wheel of history. If by chance, they are revolutionary, they are only so in view of their impending transfer into the proletariat; they thus defend not their present, but their future interests, they desert their own standpoint to place themselves at that of the proletariat.}}</ref> This does not mean however, the peasantry are useless<ref>{{Citation|author=Josef Stalin|year=1924|title=Foundations of Leninism|title-url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/foundations-leninism/|chapter=The Peasant Question|chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/foundations-leninism/ch05.htm|quote=Hence the practical conclusion that the toiling masses of the peasantry must be supported in their struggle against bondage and exploitation, in their struggle for deliverance from oppression and poverty. This does not mean, of course, that the proletariat must support every peasant movement. What we have in mind here is support for a movement or struggle of the peasantry which, directly or indirectly, facilitates the emancipation movement of the proletariat, which, in one way or another, brings grist to the mill of the proletarian revolution, and which helps to transform the peasantry into a reserve and ally of the working class.}}</ref>, and revisionist ideologies such as [[Trotskyism]] state that the peasantry are indeed useless as they are not truly revolutionary. Some other revisionist ideologies such as "[[Neo-Marxism]]" outright state that Karl Marx is wrong in this regard, and that some classes can be revolutionary even if they are decaying.
The proletariat are deemed to be the most revolutionary class, which can overthrow the bourgeoisie.<ref>{{Citation|author=Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels|year=1848|title=The Manifesto of the Communist Party|title-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/|chapter=Bourgeois and Proletarians|chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007|quote=Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product.}}</ref> As the peasantry decay into either the bourgeoisie or the proletariat, the Communist Manifesto states that they are only fighting their own survival as a class.<ref>{{Citation|author=Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels|year=1848|title=The Manifesto of the Communist Party|title-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/|chapter=Bourgeois and Proletarians|chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007|quote=[T]he peasant[ry], [They] fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class. They are therefore not revolutionary, but conservative. Nay more, they are reactionary, for they try to roll back the wheel of history. If by chance, they are revolutionary, they are only so in view of their impending transfer into the proletariat; they thus defend not their present, but their future interests, they desert their own standpoint to place themselves at that of the proletariat.}}</ref> This does not mean however, the peasantry are useless,<ref name=":0">{{Citation|author=Josef Stalin|year=1924|title=Foundations of Leninism|title-url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/foundations-leninism/|chapter=The Peasant Question|chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/foundations-leninism/ch05.htm|quote=Hence the practical conclusion that the toiling masses of the peasantry must be supported in their struggle against bondage and exploitation, in their struggle for deliverance from oppression and poverty. This does not mean, of course, that the proletariat must support every peasant movement. What we have in mind here is support for a movement or struggle of the peasantry which, directly or indirectly, facilitates the emancipation movement of the proletariat, which, in one way or another, brings grist to the mill of the proletarian revolution, and which helps to transform the peasantry into a reserve and ally of the working class.}}</ref> and revisionist ideologies such as [[Trotskyism]] state that the peasantry are indeed useless as they are not truly revolutionary. Some other [[Revisionism|revisionist]] ideologies such as "[[Neo-Marxism]]" outright state that [[Karl Marx]] is wrong in this regard, and that some classes can be revolutionary even if they are decaying.
 
Peasants in the [[imperial core]] are less revolutionary because [[Bourgeois revolution|bourgeois revolutions]] led by the [[Liberalism|liberal]] bourgeoisie overthrew feudalism in those countries instead of a revolution led by the proletariat.<ref name=":0" />
 
== Types of peasants ==
 
=== Poor peasants ===
Poor peasants are the most revolutionary category of peasants. They do not own their own land and are exploited by [[Landlord|landlords]].<ref name=":1">{{Citation|author=[[Mao Zedong]]|year=1926|title=Analysis of the Classes in Chinese Society|mia=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_1.htm}}</ref>
 
=== Middle peasants ===
Middle peasants or owner-peasants own and cultivate their own land on a small scale.<ref name=":1" />
 
=== Collective farm peasants ===
Collective farm peasants or ''kolkhozniki'' are a category of peasant that exists in [[Socialist state|socialist countries]] and works on large farms shared by many people.<ref>{{Citation|author=Joseph Stalin|year=1939|title=History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks)|chapter=The Bolshevik Party in the Struggle for the Collectivization of Agriculture|mia=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1939/x01/ch03.htm|chapter-url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1939/x01/ch11.htm}}</ref>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 23:28, 24 October 2022

The peasantry (individual is labelled as a peasant) are a social class created from the feudal mode of production. While the peasant performs labour on the land the same way a serf does, the peasant owns that land as well. As the peasantry are a creation of feudalism, the peasantry is decaying into either the bourgeoisie or the proletariat, as the productive forces advance on the specific countries. Their characteristic is petit bourgeois, but they usually do not have an antagonistic contradiction with the proletariat.

The peasantry are used in many revolutions in underdeveloped nations, the most famous ones being the October Revolution and the Chinese Civil War, as there is often more of a majority of peasants rather than proletarians.

Characteristics of the peasantry

Class character

Peasants are petit-bourgeois[1] as they work the land and perform the labour on that land as well. The land constitutes part of the means of production, especially because it is a relic of the feudal era.

Role in revolution

The proletariat are deemed to be the most revolutionary class, which can overthrow the bourgeoisie.[2] As the peasantry decay into either the bourgeoisie or the proletariat, the Communist Manifesto states that they are only fighting their own survival as a class.[3] This does not mean however, the peasantry are useless,[4] and revisionist ideologies such as Trotskyism state that the peasantry are indeed useless as they are not truly revolutionary. Some other revisionist ideologies such as "Neo-Marxism" outright state that Karl Marx is wrong in this regard, and that some classes can be revolutionary even if they are decaying.

Peasants in the imperial core are less revolutionary because bourgeois revolutions led by the liberal bourgeoisie overthrew feudalism in those countries instead of a revolution led by the proletariat.[4]

Types of peasants

Poor peasants

Poor peasants are the most revolutionary category of peasants. They do not own their own land and are exploited by landlords.[5]

Middle peasants

Middle peasants or owner-peasants own and cultivate their own land on a small scale.[5]

Collective farm peasants

Collective farm peasants or kolkhozniki are a category of peasant that exists in socialist countries and works on large farms shared by many people.[6]

References

  1. “The lower middle class, the small manufacturer, the shopkeeper, the artisan, the peasant, all these fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class.”

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (1848). The Manifesto of the Communist Party: 'Bourgeois and Proletarians'.
  2. “Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product.”

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (1848). The Manifesto of the Communist Party: 'Bourgeois and Proletarians'.
  3. “[T]he peasant[ry], [They] fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class. They are therefore not revolutionary, but conservative. Nay more, they are reactionary, for they try to roll back the wheel of history. If by chance, they are revolutionary, they are only so in view of their impending transfer into the proletariat; they thus defend not their present, but their future interests, they desert their own standpoint to place themselves at that of the proletariat.”

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (1848). The Manifesto of the Communist Party: 'Bourgeois and Proletarians'.
  4. 4.0 4.1
    “Hence the practical conclusion that the toiling masses of the peasantry must be supported in their struggle against bondage and exploitation, in their struggle for deliverance from oppression and poverty. This does not mean, of course, that the proletariat must support every peasant movement. What we have in mind here is support for a movement or struggle of the peasantry which, directly or indirectly, facilitates the emancipation movement of the proletariat, which, in one way or another, brings grist to the mill of the proletarian revolution, and which helps to transform the peasantry into a reserve and ally of the working class.”

    Josef Stalin (1924). Foundations of Leninism: 'The Peasant Question'.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Mao Zedong (1926). Analysis of the Classes in Chinese Society. [MIA]
  6. Joseph Stalin (1939). History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks): 'The Bolshevik Party in the Struggle for the Collectivization of Agriculture'. [MIA]