Ledlecreeper27 added an ideological dispute message box; but there's no actual discussion on the controversies section.
We should review the recent changes to see if we keep them since GopnikAward just added them after arguing with Luna Oi on Twitter. There are also legitimate criticisms of the Chinese invasion of Vietnam.
We should review the recent changes to see if we keep them since GopnikAward just added them after arguing with Luna Oi on Twitter.
Where did GopnikAward argue with Luna Oi? Show me evidence because I haven't seen them do so.
Also, why should that potential event support the removal of the changes? Most of the added claims, aside from the unsourced "claiming critics are ultra left", do have evidence (in this case, through Luna Oi's twitter) account. Why should we remove that text?
There are also legitimate criticisms of the Chinese invasion of Vietnam.
How is this relevant to the Luna Oi page? GopnikAward did not add any mention of the Chinese invasion of Vietnam.
@Amicchan It was not an argument, it was Luna Oi calling me a western ultra. https://twitter.com/LunaOi_VN/status/1614236313246474240
Ohh, that's what it's about. You support the Kampuchea just because they support communism; so you think that Vietnam ruined Kampuchean cambodia.
She indeed called you an ultraleftist, but that's in response to you denouncing the Vietnamese liberation of Cambodia, which supports the existence of the Kampuchea (hence the attack-defense contradiction). Now I see where she is coming from.
I had a feeling you supported the Kampuchea from the way you written about the Vietnamese liberation of Cambodia.
and that's why I wanted evidence. I would have missed out on that nuance otherwise.