Uyghur genocide allegations: Difference between revisions
More languages
More actions
m (fixed sourcing issue) Tag: Visual edit |
(added notes to NYT section) Tag: Visual edit |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=== ''The New York Times'' === | === ''The New York Times'' === | ||
On 2019 November 16, ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported on supposed leaked documents on Xinjiang. Grammatical errors | On 2019 November 16, ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported on supposed leaked documents on Xinjiang. State media was quick to assert that these documents were not authentic, calling them "fabricated."<ref>{{Web citation|newspaper=Global Times|title=新疆政府新闻发言人驳斥纽约时报涉疆虚假报道|date=2019-11-19|url=http://news.china.com.cn/2019-11/19/content_75422796.htm}}</ref> Grammatical errors indicated that the documents were fake and likely translated from English to Chinese, with users further noting that the "leaked" docs did not correspond to the formatting standards of Chinese government documents (GB/T9704).<ref name=":02" /> | ||
== International visits to Xinjiang == | == International visits to Xinjiang == |
Revision as of 05:54, 24 July 2023
The so-called Uyghur genocide is an imperialist myth propagated by the U.S. government since 2017. It claims that the Chinese government is committing genocide against the Uyghur people of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. However, the Uyghur population has been steadily increasing and grew by more than 25% between 2010 and 2018 even though the total population of Xinjiang only rose by 13.99%. The Uyghur population is growing faster than Han Chinese (2%) or other ethnic minorities (22.14%).[1] Chinese protections of Islam have been reputed to be contested by some citizens as suggesting preferential treatment, refuting the claim that the China's policies are anti-Islam.[2] And regarding Uyghurs, it's strange that China has roughly 54 other ethnic groups which have been relatively unscathed, including other Muslim-majority ethnic groups such as the Hui ethnic group, which is larger than the Uyghur population. In 2019, almost 1,000 diplomats and journalists from many countries as well as the UN, EU, Arab League, African Union, and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation visited Xinjiang and found no evidence of genocide.[3]
Sources of claims
Adrian Zenz
Adrian Zenz is a far-right racist connected to the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, which is controlled by the U.S. government. When asked why he pursued studies on China, Zenz said, “I feel very clearly led by God to do this. I can put it that way. I’m not afraid to say that. With Xinjiang, things really changed. It became like a mission, or a ministry.”[4] He claimed that Xinjiang is forcibly sterilizing Uyghur women with IUDs. In fact, only 328,475 of China's total 3,774,318 IUDs were in Xinjiang.[1] In September 2018, he said there were about 1,060,000 Uyghurs in re-education camps. This number is based on anonymous interviews with only eight people.[3] In his initial report for the ~1M estimate, Radio Free Asia is cited four times, and the estimate is only mentioned on (pp. 21-2). Zenz finds this number by roughly extrapolating a “leaked” report by Newsweek Japan (affiliated with Newsweek Inc.).[5] This report came from “Istekral TV”, which frequently platforms the terrorist organization ETIM—the report was never confirmed. Zenz's homophobic, pro-hate crime/discrimination, and pro-child abuse arguments can be found in his novel Worthy Escape: Why All Believers Will Not be Raptured Before the Tribulation,[6] which contains such notes as:
“It is very likely that the global persecution of true believers will center on the charge that they promote ‘intolerant views,’ especially related to preaching against homosexuality” (p. 85)
“Hate crime and anti-discrimination laws will likely play a major role in the suppression of biblical Christianity” (p. 86)
“Rising numbers of countries are banning all forms of physical punishment of children, the primary scriptural method for instilling respect for authority in the young generation and protecting them from rebellious tendencies… But true scriptural spanking is loving discipline and not violence, and neglecting the wisdom of God makes the church increasingly vulnerable to the schemes of the enemy” (120-121)
“God's refining process will wipe out all unbelieving Jews who refuse to come to Christ and leave only born-again Israelites to enter the millennial reign of Christ” (pp. 618-619)
“The Antichrist is dependent on the harlot, because he must seize upon humanity's desperate craving for all that the harlot offers in order to achieve world domination. The world will worship him because he will promise them all these things, promoting sexual ‘freedom’ (the unrestrained and godless practice of all sexual behaviors, including homosexuality), control over their affairs (independence from God), and he will vow to maintain people's standard of living” (pp. 653-654)
Zamira Dawut
BBC claimed that Zamira Dawut was sterilized at a vocational center. Her brother, Abduhelil, said she had never been to a vocational center. Zamira said her father was arrested multiple times and then died of unknown causes. In reality, he was never arrested or even investigated and died of heart disease on 2019 October 12.[1]
The New York Times
On 2019 November 16, The New York Times reported on supposed leaked documents on Xinjiang. State media was quick to assert that these documents were not authentic, calling them "fabricated."[7] Grammatical errors indicated that the documents were fake and likely translated from English to Chinese, with users further noting that the "leaked" docs did not correspond to the formatting standards of Chinese government documents (GB/T9704).[3]
International visits to Xinjiang
Diplomats
In 2018 December, diplomats from Afghanistan, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Thailand, and Uzbekistan visited Xinjiang and had full access to vocational training centers. They found no evidence of forced labor or cultural or religious oppression.
On 2019 January 29, an EU delegation visited. On February 25, about 200 representatives of 50 political parties from almost 30 countries visited Ürümqi. On February 28, diplomats from Algeria, Burma, Greece, Hungary, Morocco, Vietnam, and the Arab League visited. China offered to let the EU visit again in March, but it declined. On March 27, the Albanian and Serbian ambassadors to China (Selim Belortaja and Milan Bačević) visited. On June 15, Under Secretary-General of the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Office Vladimir Voronkov visited Xinjiang. Between June 18 and 21, diplomats from Algeria, Burkina Faso, the DR Congo, Laos, Malaysia, Nigeria, Serbia, Somalia, Tajikistan, Togo, and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation visited. On August 19, diplomats from Bahrain, Cambodia, Laos, Nepal, Nigeria, the Philippines, and Sri Lanka visited. In September, diplomats from the African Union and 16 African countries, including Burundi, Djibouti, Lesotho, Sudan, Uganda, and Zimbabwe visited. In November, Fahri Hamzah, former Deputy Speaker of the Indonesian House of Representatives, visited Xinjiang. On November 11, the World Bank visited Xinjiang and found no abnormalities in the vocational centers.[3]
Media
On 2019 January 6, Reuters visited Xinjiang. Starting on January 9, 12 media representatives from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, Sri Lanka, and Turkey visited. Another media delegation from Egypt visited on January 29. On February 22, 11 journalists from Indonesia and Malaysia visited. On 2019 May 7, NPR released its report on a visit to a vocational center. On 2019 June 18, BBC visited a vocational center. Starting on July 14, journalists from 24 countries, including India, Iran, Italy, Japan, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, Turkey, the USA, and Uzbekistan visited Xinjiang. On August 17, a media group from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Japan, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Qatar, Russia, Turkey, and the UAE visited. On August 29, ABC News visited a vocational center.[3] On October 10, 2021, as Xinjiang was slowly opening for tourism, the Associated Press traveled to Xinjiang in order to investigate the measures taken by the government. They concluded that the genocidal policies had existed at some point but had been done away with before the opening measures, although the article still critiqued certain things they felt stifled Uyghur culture.[8] A response was posted afterwards by The New Atlas which bemoaned several of the article's pretensions.[9]
International reactions
In 2019 July, the 41st session of the UN Human Rights Council met and voted on two opposing letters regarding Xinjiang. 50 countries voted in favor of China's policies and 22 voted against.
On 2019 October 29, at the 74th session of the UN General Assembly, 24 countries and the EU criticized China and 57 countries supported China.[3]
See also
Further reading
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 "Fact Check: Lies on Xinjiang-related issues vs. the truth" (2021-02-06). CGTN. Archived from the original on 2023-04-09. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
- ↑ "Use of anti-Islam words to defame Muslims banned on Chinese social media" (2019-11-26). Business Standard.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 "Xinjiang: A Report and Resource Compilation" (2021-09-21). Qiao Collective. Archived from the original on 2022-06-20. Retrieved 2022-06-24.
- ↑ Josh Chin (2019-5-21). "The German Data Diver Who Exposed China’s Muslim Crackdown" The Wall Street Journal.
- ↑ Adrian Zenz (2018). ‘Thoroughly reforming them towards a healthy heart attitude’: China’s political re-education campaign in Xinjiang. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2018.1507997 [HUB]
- ↑ Adrian Zenz (2012). Worthy Escape: Why All Believers Will Not be Raptured Before the Tribulation. WestBow Press.
- ↑ "新疆政府新闻发言人驳斥纽约时报涉疆虚假报道" (2019-11-19). Global Times.
- ↑ Dake Kang (2021-10-10). "Terror & tourism: Xinjiang eases its grip, but fear remains" The Associated Press.
- ↑ The New Atlas. "AP News Confirms NO Uyghur Genocide in Xinjiang China". YouTube.