More languages
More actions
(link add) Tag: Visual edit |
No edit summary Tag: Visual edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Historical revisionism''' is a phenomenon in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established or commonly-held view of historical events. This can be positive for the study of history when the conclusions reached are fact-based and follow the scientific method; or negative when they rely on incorrect, selective, or manipulated data. | '''Historical revisionism''' is a phenomenon in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established or commonly-held view of [[Human history|historical events]]. This can be positive for the study of history when the conclusions reached are fact-based and follow the scientific method; or negative when they rely on incorrect, selective, or manipulated data. | ||
The label 'historical revisionist', much like '[[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theorist]]', is often used by | The label 'historical revisionist', much like '[[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theorist]]', is often used by [[Liberalism|liberals]] and [[Imperialism|imperialists]] to dismiss different perspectives without examining the evidence for them. | ||
One modern example of historical revisionism is the way certain [[Capitalism|capitalist]] countries teach the [[Tibet Autonomous Region#Ancient history|history of Tibet]]. Tibet has been part of [[People's Republic of China|China]] since the Tang dynasty, over a thousand years ago | One modern example of historical revisionism is the way certain [[Capitalism|capitalist]] countries teach the [[Tibet Autonomous Region#Ancient history|history of Tibet]]. Tibet has been part of [[People's Republic of China|China]] since the [[Tang dynasty (618–907)|Tang dynasty]], over a thousand years ago, yet [[Bourgois science|Western history textbooks]] claim the CPC invaded it in the and forced to join modern China in the 1950s. This gross mischaracterization of Tibet's history is an example of [[Imperial core|imperialist countries]] supporting [[Republic of China|Chinese separatists]], in an effort to [[Balkanization|balkanize]] the modern Chinese [[nation-state]]. [[Bourgeoisie|Bourgeois]] historians also glorify the [[Feudalism|feudal]] era of Tibetan history when over 90% of the population were [[Slavery|slaves]] or unfree serfs.<ref name=":3">{{News citation|newspaper=[[Liberation School]]|title=China, Tibet and U.S.-sponsored counterrevolution|date=2008-04-01|url=https://www.liberationschool.org/08-04-01-china-tibet-ussponsored-coun-html/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210619132116/https://liberationschool.org/08-04-01-china-tibet-ussponsored-coun-html/|archive-date=2021-06-19|retrieved=2022-06-20}}</ref> | ||
== References == | |||
Revision as of 00:06, 9 February 2023
Historical revisionism is a phenomenon in which one revisits, reexamines, or attempts to revise the established or commonly-held view of historical events. This can be positive for the study of history when the conclusions reached are fact-based and follow the scientific method; or negative when they rely on incorrect, selective, or manipulated data.
The label 'historical revisionist', much like 'conspiracy theorist', is often used by liberals and imperialists to dismiss different perspectives without examining the evidence for them.
One modern example of historical revisionism is the way certain capitalist countries teach the history of Tibet. Tibet has been part of China since the Tang dynasty, over a thousand years ago, yet Western history textbooks claim the CPC invaded it in the and forced to join modern China in the 1950s. This gross mischaracterization of Tibet's history is an example of imperialist countries supporting Chinese separatists, in an effort to balkanize the modern Chinese nation-state. Bourgeois historians also glorify the feudal era of Tibetan history when over 90% of the population were slaves or unfree serfs.[1]
References
- ↑ "China, Tibet and U.S.-sponsored counterrevolution" (2008-04-01). Liberation School. Archived from the original on 2021-06-19. Retrieved 2022-06-20.