Communism

The hammer and sickle is the universal symbol of communism and a representation of solidarity between the proletariat working class and the peasantry

Communism is a mode of production characterized by common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes. The term is also used to refer to the movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of this mode of production.

The material abundance and resultant social relations of such a society can be summarized by the slogan: "From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." which was popularized in Karl Marx's 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program.

In the first volume of Capital, Marx mentions it as "an association of free men, working with the means of production held in common, and expending their many different forms of labour-power in full self-awareness as one single social labour force."

Etymology

Before Marx, the term communism was used by many utopian socialists to describe an idealist, egalitarian society.

Its modern usage is almost always traced back to Karl Marx's usage of the term where he introduced the concept of scientific socialism alongside Friedrich Engels. The theory of scientific socialism described communism not as an idealistic, perfect society but rather as a stage of development taking place after a long, political process of class struggle. Marx, however, used the terms socialism and communism interchangeably and he drew no distinction between the two.

Lenin was the first person to give distinct meanings to the terms socialism and communism. The socialism/communism of Marx was now known simply as communism, and Marx's "transitional phase" was to be known as socialism.

Place in historical materialism

In Marx's theory of historical materialism, communism represents the final mode of production. Each mode of production is defined by its relations of production: the class dynamics, the methods of exploitation, the systems of exchange, the level of development of the means of production, etc. Capitalism is defined by the relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, commonly referred to as a "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie". Socialism is defined by the same relations, but instead it exhibits a "dictatorship of the proletariat". Socialism still has class dynamics and exploitation, but the proletariat is the class on top.

In the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels described the evolution of society through the material changes as epochs of history. The relationships between opposing ranks such as patricians, knights, plebeians, slaves, merchants, feudal lords and vassals serve as forces of class antagonism. The current stage or epoch after the demise of feudalism at the hands of capitalism only created new classes and forms of oppression, this time between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.

Communism has no classes, and therefore no class dynamics. It has no exploitation, and therefore no methods of exploitation. While communism is never meant to be the "end of history", it is certainly the final mode of production as all contradictions of modes of productions have been wiped out.

Implementation

The implementation of communism became an extremely debated issue after the success of various communist movements. Almost all communist political theory concerns dialectical and historical materialism, socialist transformation and socialist development.

Engels provided some theory about the transition from socialism to communism (now known as the withering away of the state) in Anti-Dühring:

The proletariat seizes political power and turns the means of production in the first instance into state property. But, in doing this, it abolishes itself as proletariat, abolishes all class distinctions and class antagonisms, abolishes also the state as state. [...] As soon as there is no longer any social class to be held in subjection; as soon as class rule, and the individual struggle for existence based upon our present anarchy in production, with the collisions and excesses arising from these, are removed, nothing more remains to be repressed, and a special repressive force, a state, is no longer necessary. [...] The state is not "abolished". It dies out.

— Friedrich Engels, Anti-Dühring (1878)

Stalin discusses the topic in his work, Economic problems of socialism in the USSR:

It is necessary, first of all, to shorten the working day at least to six, and subsequently to five hours. This is needed in order that the members of society might have the necessary free time to receive an all-round education. It is necessary, further, to introduce universal compulsory polytechnical education, which is required in order that the members of society might be able freely to choose their occupations and not be tied to some one occupation all their lives. It is likewise necessary that housing conditions should be radically improved, and that real wages of workers and employees should be at least doubled, if not more, both by means of direct increases of wages and salaries, and, more especially, by further systematic reductions of prices for consumer goods. These are the basic conditions required to pave the way for the transition to communism.

— Joseph Stalin, Economic problems of socialism in the USSR

According to Cheng Enfu, the transition from socialism to communism requires the following conditions:

1. Highly advanced productive forces
2. Ownership of the means of production by the whole people and a planned economy with goods distributed according to need
3. Full development of culture, education, healthcare, science, and technology
4. Improved ideological awareness
5. Withering away of the state

Communism as an ideology

Communism is sometimes described as a political theory: Marxists have Marxism, Darwinists have Darwinism, and Communists have Communism. This term is usually used by liberals, although some communists have used the term communism this way. To have a better understanding of it, Engels stated that:

Communism is the doctrine of the conditions of the liberation of the proletariat.

— Friedrich Engels, The principles of communism, 1847

Communism as a movement

The Communist movement isn’t a simple straightforward outgrowth of worker organizing, but rather the product of an alliance between workers and socialists. Workers and socialists are natural allies, and one individual can easily belong to both groups by upbringing, but history is full of instances where this was not the case. Among the most notorious is Marx himself — a petty-bourgeois would-be lawyer married to an aristocrat, forever in partnership with Engels, a proper bourgeois. Far from burying this autobiographical detail, Marx defends himself by warning his readers: we must not imagine that “representatives of the petty-bourgeoisie” are “all shopkeepers or enthusiastic champions of shopkeepers.”

The CIA historically exploited ignorance about this fact among leftists, decisively pitting socialists and workers against each other, to the fatal detriment of both.

According to Marx, communism can be defined as the "the real movement which abolishes the present state of things." The communist movement differs from other workers' movements due to its internationalism and because it represents the entire working class.

In their seminal and most well-known work, Marx and Engels laid the basic principles of communism in which all future revolutionaries build their principles upon. For one, they acknowledged and made clear that communism, as an ideology had always existed since the rise of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. They wrote in the famous opening:

A spectre is haunting Europe—the spectre of Communism

To begin with, what we recognise as communism stems from the existence of class struggle. Marx and Engels, through historical and dialectical materialism, write that throughout history, there has always been a class struggle within known society between what we know as the ruling class and the ruled class. In the manifesto, they have given the following examples:

• Freeman and slave
• Patrician and plebeian
• Lord and serf
• Guild-master and journeymen
• Oppressor and oppressed

Even though all communists hold the bourgeoisie to be antagonistic towards the proletariat, and thus considered to be an adversary, Marx and Engels made it clear that the rise of the Bourgeoisie stemmed from their own revolutionary tendencies in overthrowing the feudal classes which in turn, led to the creation of the current contradictions between themselves and the proletariat, or what we know as, the working class.

Communists do not claim to be the first and only parties that advocate and fight for the working class. What Marx and Engels specified in regards to communists are that they recognise the struggles of the working class regardless of nationality. Marx and Engels then proceeded to emphasise was the need of a revolutionary party that would safeguard and fight for the Proletariat. Marx and Engels were resolute that the Communists are the most advanced parties for the proletariat due to their ultimate goals of:

1. Forming the proletariat into a revolutionary class
2. Overthrowing the supremacy of the bourgeoisie
3. Allowing the proletariat into conquest of political power

A common misconception that right-wingers and even some sections of the left have in regard to another aim of communism is the abolition of all property. Marx and Engels have already made exceedingly clear in the manifesto that while Communists openly intend to do away with property, they are only interested in doing away with private property which belonged exclusively to the bourgeoisie.

Communism has also been defined as a movement for the re-humanization and liberation of the exploited and oppressed masses that restores equal rights to all genders and nationalities.

The communist movement and the pro-capitalist counter-movement

The CIA and other capitalist entities form a counter-movement to communism. Their first target between workers and socialists is always the socialists — they are a smaller group of people. Socialists can be outlawed and assassinated, whereas the worker movement is large and arises organically from resentment against exploitation. More importantly, workers themselves are absolutely necessary for the operation of capitalist enterprises, so they can only be managed, never eliminated.

Socialists, then, can then be attacked easily from two well-known flanks: left-adventurism on the one hand, right-opportunism on the other. The “Shining Path” terrorist movement in Peru, a splinter of the Communist Party which often turned some of its harshest ultra-violence against Party members and various other leftist organizations, has been charged by some Peruvian historians of being a product of the CIA.

Similarly, throughout the 1980s in Poland, the US- and Vatican-backed “independent” ship-builders labour union Solidarity received all sorts of international accolades for its opposition to Communist rule, including a 1983 Nobel Peace Prize for its leader Lech Walesa (who later became Poland’s president). Poland today remains one of the most reactionary countries in Europe. Once socialists are out of the picture, it proves very easy to claw back concessions from workers, to remove prestige from opportunistic worker-leaders in capitalist payroll, and to replace them with more suitably pure-blooded liberal managers.

See also

• Quotes:Communism

References