Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Vanguard party

From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
More languages
Revision as of 10:52, 28 September 2022 by CriticalResist (talk | contribs) (expanded article)

The vanguard party, also called the vanguard, is the political party that is the most able to organise the proletariat and other popular classes (such as the peasantry) into a revolutionary party, and thus bring socialism to their country.

The vanguard plays an important role in instilling revolutionary class consciousness amongst the proletariat and plays a critical role in the dictatorship of the proletariat in consolidating ties with the proletariat of other nations and maintaining the alliance of the workers and peasants.

Origins

The concept of the vanguard party is attributed to Lenin, and synthesized from his different writings. It was effectively used by the Bolsheviks, themselves firstly a wing of the Menshevik party, during and after the October Revolution.

While the vanguard party is most associated with marxism-leninism, it is possible to apply the concept of the vanguard to other parties and ideologies.

Mechanisms

Central committee

The vanguard party is usually composed of a central committee, which acts as the executive and (to an extent) the legislative branch of the party. The committee is composed of the most knowledgeable marxists, and elected by the rest of the members.

Democratic centralism

Democratic centralism is the practice in which political decision are taken by the central committee inside the party after discussion, and expects that all members will follow these decisions even if they personally disagree with them. Unity in action is important for several reasons. First, it makes party work easier as it prevents sabotage or other difficulties from inside the party.

Second, the party needs to be flexible and react fast to events as they unfold, which is why these decisions must be taken quickly.

If there are disagreements, members can bring that up and bring a vote to change the decision later, after it has passed.

An example of democratic centralism would be the decision to show up and participate in a protest officially, as the party. Some members might disagree with that protest but if the decision is taken to support and participate in it, they are expected not to voice their disagreement in public.