Communist Party of the United States of America: Difference between revisions
From ProleWiki, the proletarian encyclopedia
More languages
More actions
m (Category.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[Category:Communist parties]] | [[Category:Communist parties]] | ||
[[Category:Communist Party USA]] | [[Category:Communist Party USA]] | ||
[[Category:Statesian | [[Category:Statesian communist parties]] |
Revision as of 16:48, 21 February 2022
Part of a series on |
Communist parties |
---|
The Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA) is a communist party in the United States currently under a reformist and opportunist leadership.[1][2] It was established in 1919 after a split from the Socialist Party of America.
Joe Sims, which is the current national chairman, published a visibly opportunist distortion of Marxism's core tenets in 2008.[3]
References
- ↑ “The CPUSA has long said the transition to US socialism will be much more prolonged and complex. [...] Just like the socialist society we envision - peaceful, humane and democratic – so too must be the path as it will shape every aspect of the new society.
[...]
Marx and Engels foresaw the possibility of peaceful transition particularly under conditions of the democratic or bourgeois republic. [...] Even Lenin initially thought a peaceful transition to workers' and peasants' power in Russia would be possible as a result of the crisis brought on by WWI, but the armed intervention of western imperialist powers changed the course of history.”
John Bachtell, chairman of PCUSA until 2019 (2014-06-23). "Elections, the state, reform and revolution" Political Affairs. - ↑ “Non-violent peaceful resistance is a very important form of struggle.
[...]
It will be what we call a democratic path. One that utilizes the electoral arena but also other democratic venues where we’re constantly trying to expand our right”
John Bachtell, chairman of CPUSA until 2019 (2018-04-25). "Marxism a vibrant philosophical outlook, says CPUSA leader" CPUSA Blog. - ↑ “[Dictatorship of the proletariat is] probably the worst phrase uttered by a political theorist ever. Who wants to live in a dictatorship? Even if I agreed with it conceptually, (which I don't), the Machiavellian in me has enough sense not to repeat it. Indefensible. And by the way, working-class “hegemony” (whatever the hell that means, sorry Gramsicans), aint much better.”
Joe Sims (2008-08-05). "Ten worst and best ideas of Marxism" Political Affairs.